View Full Version : Video streaming patent
sankt
15th May 2006, 22:36
This U.S. Supreme Court ruling today
Group Cheers Top Court Ruling in eBay Case (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060515/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_ebay) could put a end to
Acacia Technologies (http://www.eff.org/patent/wanted/patent.php?p=acacia) absurd claim of sole patent coverage for video and audio streaming; as well as on demand multimedia content distribution.
Inedible Bulk
16th May 2006, 01:32
Hopefully this kind of insanity will be prevented (http://www.boingboing.net/2006/05/08/patent_office_will_a.html) in the future. Check out this insanity (http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=1743) that just started.
ken52787
16th May 2006, 02:45
One day the patent wars will start and the whole system will crumble.
KTSC2K
16th May 2006, 03:20
Most people don't know this, but in 2004, Congress passed and President George W. Bush signed into law a three-year extension of the Internet Tax Moratorium, which has been in effect almost continually since 1998. Americans thus don’t have to worry about paying extra taxes for their access to the Internet over and above what they already pay on telecom services....well, at least for now.
This may be something else worse.
just F.Y.I.
rockouthippie
16th May 2006, 05:35
From the article:
system is riddled with abuse, mainly from "patent trolls," or small businesses that sue established companies to enforce patents for ideas that have never been developed into products.
I think you could look at this two ways. As long as we have the current patent system, development of ideas into usable software products is irrelevant. It's the ideas that are important under current law.
For as many instances of "trolls", there are corporations that hold and protect patents on intuitive ideas that anyone would have thought of.
We mostly know that ideas are a dime a dozen, and that it's hard work that brings things to market. Corporate jealousy in their patents stifles technology.
Many times ideas don't get developed until the patents have expired. If patent laws ever get like copyright laws are.... in that they last for more than a century.... things will really be fouled up.
This case in David facing Goliath and losing doesn't make me very happy, because Goliath slays David, every day in our courts.
Mainly ideas held by IBM and Microsoft make it almost impossible to develop word processing, video streaming or encryption technology without paying fabulous patent fees, if the owner will even allow the technology to be used.
One set of ideas that Microsoft guards is it's ASF file wrapper for an example. Not a particularly unique idea, but enough with patents to make sure that no one could develop new software using the technology for profit.
This wouldn't be so bad, except that microsofts implementation of it's streaming system is crappy.
One example of where MS flexed it's muscle is with virtualdub. It used to be able to read the ASF format, which would have been useful. The developers got squished by MS into removing any code that would read the ASF file format.
Again, that wouldn't be so bad, except MS never made a product that works as well as virtualdub. Windows Movie Maker SUCKS!.
It isn't the only example of patented ideas being developed into inferior products. Products that can never be improved upon until the patents expire.
The problem in computer science is that the state of the art improves so fast that 15 year old ideas are hardly useful.
I don't think I'm cheering that the little guy got bent here. I don't think the effect of this small company winning a lawsuit is anything compared to the major corporate stifling of technology by patent enforcement.
I wonder if this will eventually be like "Demolition Man" the movie where the only restaurant is Taco Bell.
It's becoming apparent that a very small number of people want to own the worlds computer technology. As new technologies get traded to large companies in exchange for the use of existing patents that no one can avoid, more and more patents are falling into the hands of fewer and fewer entities.
It's becoming evident that it won't be the companies that have the best programmers and scientists, but the ones that have the most clever lawyers, the most money and the aggressive patent registration.
Inedible Bulk
16th May 2006, 07:04
rockouthippie: just link to this
http://webshop.ffii.de/
and let people know how rediculous it is
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.