MamiyaOtaru
24th December 2000, 20:59
I have asked about this player in a few threads that compared players, but no one has felt like answering, so here it gets its own damn thread.
I just got it, and have heard no one else's opinion on it
WPlay Pro
It uses about 20 percent more system resources than winamp by my rudimentary, preliminary tests. (based on looking at the available system resources graph haha) It also has built in CD to mp3 ripping (blade codec), and mp3 to .wav decoding. ( I use Electronic Cosmo's MPEG suite for all that, but the built in is nice for my family and other neophytes) Free form skinning I believe as well. Can also use Winamp skins (hooray, so can winamp). download size 717k. Anyone else tried it?
http://www.mp3rulz.com/manual.html
I just got it, and have heard no one else's opinion on it
WPlay Pro
It uses about 20 percent more system resources than winamp by my rudimentary, preliminary tests. (based on looking at the available system resources graph haha) It also has built in CD to mp3 ripping (blade codec), and mp3 to .wav decoding. ( I use Electronic Cosmo's MPEG suite for all that, but the built in is nice for my family and other neophytes) Free form skinning I believe as well. Can also use Winamp skins (hooray, so can winamp). download size 717k. Anyone else tried it?
http://www.mp3rulz.com/manual.html