Winamp & Shoutcast Forums

Winamp & Shoutcast Forums (http://forums.winamp.com/index.php)
-   General Discussions (http://forums.winamp.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   "Wild thing, you make my heart sing" (http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?t=113599)

rm' 10th November 2002 20:46

"Wild thing, you make my heart sing"
 
Is naughty or nice better?

jyvasaa 10th November 2002 20:48

nice is much better, because if everybody is nice to each other then we wouldn't lie, and that would mean world peace. ;)

ujay 10th November 2002 20:52

Naughty is nice :).

UJ

Cameron221 10th November 2002 21:02

Quote:

Originally posted by ujay
Naughty is nice :).

UJ

Exactly

Bop 10th November 2002 21:03

Re: "Wild thing, you make my heart sing"
 
Quote:

Originally posted by rm'
Is naughty or nice better?
Depends. :)

griffinn 10th November 2002 21:08

"Naughty", "nice" and "better" are all ill-defined.

smeggle 10th November 2002 21:19

Re: "Wild thing, you make my heart sing"
 
Quote:

Originally posted by rm'
Is naughty or nice better?
Ying-Yang,,Balance ,one without the other,I don't believe could happen.
But it is taking either to the extreme,that causes the problems,I think,not sure really,but closest I can get to on my thought's about it.

Sandman2012 10th November 2002 21:37

Quote:

Originally posted by griffinn
"Naughty", "nice" and "better" are all ill-defined.
A-ha, griffinn hoists rm' on his own petard!

insomniac 10th November 2002 22:54

Naughty is definitely nice.

Bilbo Baggins 10th November 2002 22:57

Quote:

Originally posted by Sandman2012


A-ha, griffinn hoists rm' on his own petard!

Something best kept till past the watershed methinks.



Naughty is good, but when it results in you being in someones bad books, then its bad. I have hella lot of grovelling to do...

rm' 10th November 2002 23:30

Quote:

Originally posted by griffinn
"Naughty", "nice" and "better" are all ill-defined.
I never defined them, so I have no idea what you are talking about. The definitions are up to you.

The Rhino 10th November 2002 23:39

Quote:

Originally posted by rm'
I never defined them, so I have no idea what you are talking about. The definitions are up to you.
And thats what makes them ill-defined, the fact that its up to us

rm' 10th November 2002 23:46

That's backwards logic, if I've ever seen it.

Some1 10th November 2002 23:57

No it isn't, your expectations of what people will do are just too high...if you do not provide definitions of the relavent terms in this discussion then everything is going to go to hell, especially since "naughty," "nice," and "better" are all fairly ambiguous terms.

Anyways, I'd have to say that neither is better as different people all have different preferences, so really it's just a matter of personal choice, and as far as my choice goes, I'd rather get the best of both worlds and have both the naughty and the nice.

Creative210 10th November 2002 23:59

Quote:

Originally posted by rm'
That's backwards logic, if I've ever seen it.
Ive gotta agree. :)

rm' 11th November 2002 00:03

Quote:

Originally posted by Some1
No it isn't, your expectations of what people will do are just too high...if you do not provide definitions of the relavent terms in this discussion then everything is going to go to hell, especially since "naughty," "nice," and "better" are all fairly ambiguous terms.
*sigh*

It's these kinds of pedantic arguments on the most insignificant of details that makes discourse on these forums meaningless.

The Rhino 11th November 2002 00:04

define the word then

rm' 11th November 2002 00:06

What's so detestable about an open-ended question?

The Rhino 11th November 2002 00:10

it causes pedantic arguments on the most insignificant of details that makes discourse on these forums meaningless.

rm' 11th November 2002 00:15

No, people are responsible for that, not the question. Even in a very focussed question, it's still possible to pick apart every single letter until the whole discussion has no relevance at all to anything.

The Rhino 11th November 2002 00:17

well then in that case naughty is definately better

smeggle 11th November 2002 00:27

No it isn't, your expectations of what people will do are just too high...if you do not provide definitions of the relavent terms in this discussion then everything is going to go to hell, especially since "naughty," "nice," and "better" are all fairly ambiguous terms.

I would still have to say that it depends on what extreme,a person would veiw these words.
It all depends on the the individual person.One persons extreme may totally oppisite to the other.(I think that has been proven on this forum form some of the archive stuff I have passed through).
I would have to say,it really does boil down to how a person interprets?,would that sound right?,each or a combination of the specific words.
Ones persons point of view in other words can be wildly different from the others and it is this,I feel that causes the discord.
I don't see anything wrong in that unless it becomes physical.That is part of what hepls us learn,I suppose,and sometimes I like a good argument but I hope I learn as well from it.
I dunno I suppose the lesson I should take from those 3 words is "You can be naughty but to be nice is much better":up:

Some1 11th November 2002 00:45

Quote:

*sigh*

It's these kinds of pedantic arguments on the most insignificant of details that makes discourse on these forums meaningless.
My statement wasn't an argument...it was a simple observation of fact...if you do not specify exactly what is to be discussed, then the discussion is going to go to hell...no argument, just an observation based on previous threads.

Besides, right below my "argument" I answered your question, even without definitions of the terms involved.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:14.

Copyright © 1999 - 2010 Nullsoft. All Rights Reserved.