Winamp & Shoutcast Forums

Winamp & Shoutcast Forums (http://forums.winamp.com/index.php)
-   Music O'Rama (http://forums.winamp.com/forumdisplay.php?f=157)
-   -   Rolling Stone Top 500 Albums (http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?t=156897)

. - .... .- -. .... 20th November 2003 10:11

Rolling Stone Top 500 Albums
 
Rolling Stone magazine has just made a list of their top 500 albums.

http://www.rollingstone.com/features...n.asp?pid=2164

Interesting to read through it though - some albums are much further down the list than I would have placed them - then again, what do I know :D

Cylob 20th November 2003 10:22

My initial thoughts - 'Utter Bollox'!!!!

There are far too many 60's albums in the mix. Pants.:D

NJK 20th November 2003 10:25

great link ethan!!

thanks a lot -i'm printing it now

indeed a strange list no abba no elvis in the first part?

first Neil Young album after the goldrush(one of his worst albums)

Cylob 20th November 2003 10:28

It's a 'slippers and cardigan' list. Written by a balding man who knows nothing.

. - .... .- -. .... 20th November 2003 10:28

London Calling, by The Clash, at 8th position?

sidd 20th November 2003 11:40

wel.. its a freekin awsome record.. but not that great..

i did notice alot of overated ones making it into the list, like sex pistols.

OutlawJim 23rd November 2003 14:23

EVIL! NO BON JOVI :p thats a bit of a crap list. stupid rolling stone. don't know anything :p i think the forum should make a music magazine and then be better than the rolling stone... yeh... fun :p

another thing is, should best of collections be allowed on that kinda thing? i don't think they should, its sooooo cheating.

Twilightseer 24th November 2003 12:19

Quote:

Originally posted by Cylob
My initial thoughts - 'Utter Bollox'!!!!

There are far too many 60's albums in the mix. Pants.:D

Ditto. The Beatles n°1 of course and like 10 albums by them in the first 50 albums...
Yuck :D

Cylob 24th November 2003 15:05

The list virtually ignores the 80s & 90s. Bah!!!!!!! Bollox x 1,000,000.

NJK 24th November 2003 15:10

thank god that i like the 70's also

there's plenty for me in the list

Twilightseer 24th November 2003 15:14

Quote:

Originally posted by Cylob
The list virtually ignores the 80s & 90s. Bah!!!!!!! Bollox x 1,000,000.
Actually, I don't even know why I click that kind of links anymore. All these so-called 'best/worst' lists are so subjective it's not even worth it.
However, the spite to the 80's and 90s is so obvious it's disgusting. These damn rock critics are stuck on the Beatles and Rolling Stones. Sad really :D

laz 26th November 2003 01:02

no tool (to me) == reviewer with no good tast in rock music.
Then again, I do not like the 80's at all, and was not even contious about music then (I was like 4). And seeing I was not alive in the 60's-70's, I do not know the more obsucre bands. Then again, I am listening to lesser known bands at the moment, and ignoring the filth that is the majority of the mainstream media.
Oh well.

Cylob 26th November 2003 08:49

Quote:

Originally posted by Twilightseer
However, the spite to the 80's and 90s is so obvious it's disgusting. These damn rock critics are stuck on the Beatles and Rolling Stones. Sad really :D
It's an unwritten law.

'Nobody will ever surpass The Beatles'
'No decade will ever suprass the 60's'

Well, BOLLOX and BOLLOX.

If I said Curve, My Bloody Valentine or The Cure were better than the Beatles, 99.9% of people would laugh. The unwritten law at work.....


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:10.

Copyright © 1999 - 2010 Nullsoft. All Rights Reserved.