![]() |
any audiophiles out there?
i have been playing with effects and values until i can't tell the difference anymore...and my ears hurt
if there are any audiophiles out there then i would like to hear your criticism regarding the quality of my stream....anything....not loud enough/ not enough mid range / too much bass ...etc. i would really value any opinions and constructive criticism kind regards |
how about a stream link?
|
|
pretty decent for 96kbps. stereo is sharp and clear. nice sounds too.
|
really...i thought it sounded pretty bad for 96k
thanx for checking it any other audiophiles keen to excercise your skills? |
Sounds nice, sharp, and clear.
I use a pair of Sennheiser HD-590s at work, but I'm in no means an audiophile. |
but u do have a wicked station and page mr fester
....i trust your judgement...thanx |
I was once concerned with the fine tuning details.
However, since many users employ their own eq settings and/or other processing tools, trying to get your end perfect will just drive you (more :p ) nuts. |
very true.
thanx again |
Sounds very good @ 96kbps (Altec Lansing sub/satellite combo). I don't think theres much more you can do =). Buffers hella fast as well -- quality stream.
|
i would tell you but i am not at my headphones at the moment :D
|
maybe next time then
|
have upped the stream to 128kbps.....am interested to hear what any other people running a 128kbps stream have to say about how it compares to their stream......any constructive arguement is welcome
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 16:46. |
Copyright © 1999 - 2010 Nullsoft. All Rights Reserved.