Winamp & Shoutcast Forums

Winamp & Shoutcast Forums (http://forums.winamp.com/index.php)
-   General Discussions (http://forums.winamp.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   wma normalisation? (http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?t=198899)

sard 10th November 2004 18:37

wma normalisation?
 
Does anybody know of a program similar to mp3 Gain that will let me normalise wma files?

shakey_snake 11th November 2004 03:54

Do you want to normalize the file, or just the playback?

If you want to normalize the file, I'd say your SOL, Microsoft is a crapface when it comes to their encryptions.

sard 11th November 2004 08:06

Yes I need to normalise the file as I will be playing them back on a portable mp3 player that’s not clever enough to normalise on the fly. What if I convert the wma to wav, normalise them then convert them back.

Will there be any loss in quality as I’m not converting between codecs and the wma conversion process is far more standardized than the mp3 one.

shakey_snake 11th November 2004 08:43

should be ok, just make sure your using the exact same bitrate/codec.

gaekwad2 11th November 2004 09:05

There will be loss.

The way lossy compression works you lose quality every time you recompress.

shakey_snake 11th November 2004 09:08

Yeah, normalizing it will cut quality a little.

gaekwad2 11th November 2004 09:16

Not normalizing, recompressing.

You can't avoid it by picking the same codec and bitrate, every time you compress you add artifacts.

sard 11th November 2004 09:26

Thanks for all the replies. I guess I’ll have to experiment and be more careful when I rip stuff in future.

shakey_snake 11th November 2004 09:33

Quote:

Originally posted by gaekwad2
Not normalizing, recompressing.

You can't avoid it by picking the same codec and bitrate, every time you compress you add artifacts.

Yeah but you could decompress to wav and then imediately recompress to wma using the same bitrate/codec without losing quality, but changing the file by normalizing it and then recompressing would lose quality.

I'm not in a mood to argue, we agree.

gaekwad2 11th November 2004 09:47

Sorry, but you're wrong.

You will always lose quality.

(and I'm too tired to explain why right now :o)

nybergh 11th November 2004 10:59

shakey:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lossy_compression

A lossy codec reshapes the sound signal to use less space. You can decode it to a wav but recompressing it again will run the same compressing alogitm over the sound signal that is now uncompressed, but already "fucked up" since lots of details are not present any more.
What transcoding (converting from another [lossy] format to another) results in is the loss of even more details of the signal. It's drinking coffee drained through several coffee filters. (duh, that was a bad example)

nybergh 11th November 2004 11:19

...and for some info on how ripping decent mp3-files, look no further, just click on this link:
http://forums.winamp.com/showthread....postid=1513620


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:19.

Copyright © 1999 - 2010 Nullsoft. All Rights Reserved.