?

I have FF, but it never occured to me to check it there... Hmmm...

Wow, I really hijacekd this thread! But, who cares!

Can people who suspect that its not displaying properly post a screenshot? Better yet, email them to me at Jerimiah[dot]40[at]Gmail[dot]com.

EDIT: sayed something stupid...

? couldn't you just put jerimiah40@googlemail.com

(I wrote googlemail in case their is a reason you didn't post your email).

Are you worried about spam bots or something?

I dunno, I guess I could have. But yeah, I'd rather not have spambots attacking my inbox, and I heard that it helped to not hyperlink to it directly. Now that I think about it though, it doens't make much sense. Is it true?

@bigmoosie - No comment

Yes

http://www.aocore.com/wa5/site_at_firefox_thumbnail.jpg

Well, thats kinda fucked up. I'll have to play around with that. Anyone have any ideas what could be happening? Also, can somebody who has Opera or some other popular browser check it out for me?

Nothing warms the soul on a saturday night at home than a few good bannings.
You know, I'll never forget my first banning. It was a cold wintry day in July, when my banfinger got it's first true test.

Well even if you are worried about spam (which I don't htink you should here). Just put jerimiah40 @google.com - that way it's still easy to read but will not be picked up by any suspected bots.

there is no such thing as googlemail.com

To get an idea, you should at least start checking the CSS with the jigsaw at w3c.org... here is the result I got:

http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/v...usermedium=all

Most everybody would realize that goooglemail.com == gmail.com and that he wrote it out "fully" to fool spambots and idiots.

Actually, now that you've utilized it in a post, technically, there is such a thing.

Jesus your an idiot. Did you read the information in brackets??

Fickle i'm gonna have to quote you here..

:rolleyes:

Well, I validated the CSS, and got it to be fine. Than, I went to do the HTML, and it couldn't do it properly, because the first line wasn't a Doctype Declaration. In the file however, it is, but in the source code, its not. Why? Because, Geocities puts a whole bunch of shit in at the top for no apparent reason. So, I did it with the file saved on my computer, and when I do it like that, Its perfectly fine HTML 4.01 Transitional. So, the HTML is valid except for geocities 2 cents, and the CSS is fine as well. This is really messed up.

Yes, but you don't need to validate the document with html, you can validate the css file separatly...

Validate what you want, but we won't validate your existence here.

WRONG!


CHEV is smarter than everyone in winamp forums....

I did validate the CSS file seperately, it said it was fine.

This is pissing me off, I'm starting a new thread for this.

Great, can you call that one "I ate my own turds"?

LOL! Where do you get all these ideas from... (really)

I'm as nice as you! (Well, almost. ;) )

And you know what prawns are, babe. I thought we'd had them before. Or did I dream it? :)

I steal them from really bad, out of work comedians.

Validations of various sites:
google.com
yahoo.com
aol.com
amazon.com
cnn.com
weather.com
espn.com
microsoft.com
apple.com
nytimes.com
webmd.com
time.com
ebay.com
mapquest.com
sourceforge.net
winamp.com
adobe.com
macromedia.com
Man, I hope none of those sites paid for their web design because not one of them validates. :p
These are what I could think of off the top of my head. I'd be interested in finding out what popular websites actually do validate.

He should be a stand up comedian or comedy writer. And usually I say this to people who think they're funy but tell shitty jokes.

But this time I mean it. Chev is fucking hilarious.

The W3 site validates :p

The only popular non-geek website I know off the top of my head that validates is albinoblacksheep.

deviantart validates

Yes, but Deviant Art doesn't follow the recommendation of not using tables for layout.

Every site listed is very old, also.

Well, I consider every site in XHTML to be quite new, I don't know what you mean about that zootm? :) Deviant Art uses XHTML 1.0 it starts off good with divs.. but once the tricky layout starts, it's tables all the way.

Try Slashdot.

sounds like me only I don't make threads called "i pood my pants", and I don't settle for number four in anything..

Really?

hmmm... for some reason i remember it did, i guess not. anyway it doesnt really matter if a site validates.

You're a funny guy.

Yeah, I'm having some trouble with divs. They render differently in IE and other browsers. I find it hard to get things decent-looking across browsers.

Uses tables though.

heh, slashdot uses html 3.2 DTD

Man BigMoosie your like Special Ed with a computer


http://www.comedycentral.com/images/...cial_ed_a3.jpg

He's like Special Ed with TWO hands up his bottom.

STFU!!!!

BigMoosie, have you ever said anything intelligent? Is there going to be a time where I will enjoy one of your posts? Please, inform me.