we're all going to die!!!!
 

New Al Qaida threats against America

I'm not sure why this hasn't gotten much mainstream media exposure?

Read the whole thing. It's pretty scary, but then, it is meant to be scary.

How is this one any different from the threats they made last weekend? Or the week before, or the month before?

Bingo. They've not recieved more media attention because they do this all the time.

got some links to past threats for me?

just another reason why we should nuke iraq into oblivion... (al-qaida is in iraq... right?)
(if not, yes i failed geography :p)

Last thing I heard they're in Pakistan (which is an ally of the US, oops).

..It kind of takes the edge off of the fear when they tell you they're planning something.

let's bomb iraq anyway...

bIn Laden keeps saying this again and again, and he's bin Laden. Who the hell is Rakan Ben Williams?

It's called reading the article:

Cat Stevens?

It's called a rhetorical question.

Where is Ronald Reagan and "We begin bombing in 5 minutes". You'll notice the Libyans have been EXTREMELY cooperative ever since.

Why is there anything more than a foot tall in Tehran?.

This is a mistake in our foreign policy. We have never successfully negotiated with Arab terrorists or terrorists nations, except for Ronald Reagans "negotiation" with Kudafi.

I think any time we get the "last warning" we ought to find something to bomb. If we hear anyone say "Jihad" we should destroy 5 miles square around the person that said it.

The arabs are a martial people and what you get when you negotiate with them is Palestine. What you get when you bomb them is peace like Libya. You'll notice the lebanese civil war went away too.

Jimmy Carter should have fixed the Iranians "red wagon" right then and there with "America held hostage".

We should not be deploying ground troops anywhere. We should give the Navy some good coffee and lots of ordinance.

The problem is that we have to stop the "civilians", not the terrorists. Arab civilians have the idea that these terrorists are some sort of folk heroes and protect them. They'd quit doing that if there were EXTREME reprisals.

Right now, erasing Tehran would set a good example. Issue appropriate warning that the city will be completely destroyed by nuclear attack to let the civilians leave and then "do her".

The only reason these guys fly the finger at us is that we let them.

You can't fly a finger if it's not attached to the rest of you any more.

You might think it would be callous to wipe out a couple of million Iranians. The truth is that in the long run it's gonna cost more to let the regimes in Syria and Iran continue. The situation in Palestine would probably be better for both Israelis and Palestinians had the Israelis employed truly devastating force.

Negotiation?. see it our way or get blown up....really there is NOTHING TO NEGOTIATE!.

Iran wants nukes ..... NO PERIOD!.
Syria supports the terrorist training camps .... NO!.
Pakistan and it's nuke program .... AGAIN NO!.

Did we really have anything to talk about?. NO!.

We don't have to negotiate and we shouldn't be.

Playing trigger happy macho feels sooo good, right, Mr. superior values?

Btw, didn't Reagan say he'd bomb Russia in 5 minutes?


I think we can be very glad most muslims are far more civilised than some members of this forum.

Oh yeah, them muslims are so damned civilized that they hang gay teenagers, blow up our trade center, stone adulterous women to death, torture political prisoners, kidnap our citizens, blow up our naval vessels and embassies, blow up busses in London, bomb Israeli school children and nerve gas hundreds of thousands of dissidents in their own countries.

Meanwhile we negotiate?. It's a rat... When it's a rat, you get out the RAT-X, not diplomats.

Yes, it was Russia. Another rockouthippie classic. :blah:

I thought he said that before he bombed Libya... that's irrelevant the fact is that he did bomb Libya HARD, and the Libyans haven't been much trouble since....

And Reagan let the Navy do our talking. No ground troops. Just lots and lots of bombs.

Then we come to Jimmy Carter and "America held hostage" for a year and a half. I would have blasted Iran into the stone age.

If that had happened, the Iranians would be asking for permission to build a lemonade stand, instead of demanding the right to build nuclear weapons.

isn't it funny the navy bombs things more often than... say THE AIRFORCE? or even the marines? both of which should be more capable of doing so, since the navy is supposedly water based, the air force is... well... air based... and the marines... well... the marines are the all-in-one of the US military

Marines are primarily amphibious assult forces, and are a branch of the Navy.

For a country near an ocean or a sea, why send in the Marines or Air Force? Just stay off shore and send in cruise missles from ships.

But you're not even after the rat.

You just want to prove your (nuclear) dick is bigger than theirs.

But yeah, I was exaggerating. I should have said you're exactly the same.
Religious right = religious right, hardly matters what religion.

From a 1992 web document "designed to provide context for the allegations in the US and Scottish indictments of Libyan nationals for the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 in December 1988.":

That was in 1992, six years after the raid. If Libya has changed its behavior, it's only been during the past few years.

Hey, it's not that I don't respect your crazy opinions, but could you PLEASE stop trying to buttress them with facts? You're embarassing us all, especially yourself.

I'm barely religious and hardly "right".

What I see is that while we'd all like to live in a pacifist world, we can't.

We haven't learned the lesson that history teaches us.

After WWI, Germany was not supposed to have an army. They started to re-arm in the mid-1920s and no one stopped them. We didn't stop them when they overan Poland, the Czechs and France. Denmark and Finland gave us pause, but that still wasn't enough.

We had to wait until they had enough power that they were a real threat. It was the same in Iraq and it's the same in Syria and Iran.

We continue to prove what a bunch of pussies we are. Carter proved it, GB senior proved it and we even forced the Israelis to prove it.

If we had stopped Hitler in 1929:

No WWII
No one hundred million people dead.
The Japanese wouldn't have attacked Pearl, nor would the have run amok in the Pacific.
No cold war.... therefore no Stalinist control of eastern europe and probably no development of nuclear weapons.

If we had finished the job in Korea:
No North Korea with missile programs.

If we had blasted Iran in 1976:
No state sponsoring terrorism.
No Iran/Iraq war.
We wouldn't have armed Sadam Hussien.
Afghanistan wouldn't have happened.
The Syrians would be silent.

If GB senior had finished the job in Iraq:
Our trade center would be standing.
2 million in the Iran/Iraq war (that would have never happened)would be alive.
A million Iraqi children wouldn't have starved to death.
3000 troops and 3000 people in the trade center would be alive.

This is hardly a Christian idea.

When we have irreconcilable enemies, we should kill them.

The result of inaction is always more costly. These guys count on the fact that we will negotiate.

They see our diplomacy as weakness..... and THEY'RE RIGHT!.

None of these Arab states has even entered into good faith negotiations. That's except Libya and that's only because Reagan bombed the living shit out if it. They just negotiate to buy time to figure out some other way to kill us.

Look at a freely elected terrorist government in Palestine for a good example.

If the roles were reversed in Palestine and the Palestinians had power, they would kill all the Israelis. The Israelis have sought diplomacy and paid for it with the lives of thousands of their citizens.

If you really boil this down to where all of this would have not happened, it would be a 10 year period where we let Hitler run amok. The Arabs would have never been armed in the first place. 3 million Jews and 9 million polish and the male population of France would have been happy europeans instead of being shot or gassed. 250,000 of us would have been home instead of Arlington.

But we were all too much of a bunch of tree huggers.

"Walk softly and carry a big stick". It's time to get that "big stick" part right.

Stereotype of the day! YEY!!!

I quote : "thou shall not hate, lest ye become thus you hate"

Who said anything about hate?. I don't hate anyone. But if I run into an enemy that hates me, is irreversible in that hate, I can't negotiate and they come to my home to kill me or show that that is their intent..... I'm kicking some ass....

If negotiations with the arabs would make them abandon "Jihad" then that's the tact we should take.... but negotiations don't work... so we should remove the threat with finality...

You'll notice the Japanese no longer blindly follow their imperialist emperor. They now live in peace as good neighbors. That's because the ones that followed this ideal are all dead or scared shitless.

Islamic radicals will have to meet the same end. They have sworn to kill us and only negotiate to help them to that end. Just like the Japanese "negotiated" before they bombed Pearl Harbor, while invading China and among other places, the completely peaceful Phillipines.

'twas just a reminder my good sir.

hey, look, i have the same stance on this issue as you do, i wish bush had the balls to nuke the whole fucking shitpond country... :)