my unpublished skin
 

This is from I skin I submitted. It's called Reefer Madness. Just a movie poster from the old movie. It has so called objectionable material???? It's only a movie poster. There's no nudity or a anything. Is the the word marijuana illegal or something??? I just don't understand why it wasn't published.

Can you by chance give us the ID number to the skin please? Or better, post a link to somewhere on the net where I can download it? At first glance, I'm not real sure why this would be declined as objectionable either. :confused:

lol

I gotta see this skin. Reefer Madness is one of the greatest schlock movies of all time. :D :D

Oh, and welcome to the forums Chris. :)

reply for my unpublished skin
 

it seems that some of you agree that my skin should have been published. So here is a tag for you to get it. http://www.winamp.com/skins/submit/e...omponent=74289 I'm not sure this with work, but I hope so. If not and you still want it, send me an email and I'll send it to you.

reply for my unpublished skin
 

it seems that some of you agree that my skin should have been published. So here is a tag for you to get it. http://www.winamp.com/skins/submit/e...omponent=74289 I'm not sure this with work, but I hope so. I'm posting it also in a zip file, hopefully tou know what to do with it. If not and you still want it, send me an email and I'll send it to you.

reply for my unpublished skin
 

it seems that some of you agree that my skin should have been published. So here is a tag for you to get it. http://www.winamp.com/skins/submit/e...omponent=74289 I'm not sure this with work, but I hope so. I don't really know how to exactly do it. If this doesn't work and you still want it, send me an email and I'll send it to you. No Problem.

grrrrrr
 

threee straight is that a record?

i saw 5 once :D

Let me guess Keetah, it was Ampburner :D:D:D:D:D:D:D. Anyway, I gotta dissapoint you folks, it's a pic skin :(.

http://winamp.com/skins/detail.jhtml...ponentId=74289

Ok, let us do a little background checking and see if this is really "objectionable" ... it was a film afterall. :)

Problem solved. Skin has been published by a member of the review squad. Good day. :)

maybe it was deemed objectionable b/c it is to do w/ a substance which is currently verbotten in the u.s., and could thus be seen as winamp (and therefore AOL) promoting it's use

then again, reefer madness is a great movie, good idea for a skin, man

grrrrrrrr
 

who cares catholics say you should only have sex for procreation but people still do it, heh people are doing it right now in groups or 10

:rolleyes: X2

grrrrrrr
 

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:


beat ya...

Aside from it not being the most appealing skin to look at, I don't see anything objectionable about it. There are tons of weed skins in the database. Some I think are objectionable but this particular one does not glorify or promote the use of the substance. It's just a bad skinner skin...

It would be different if it said "weed or college" making weed seem to be the most appealing option. I would think that is offensive.

(understood this has been solved, just felt like having an opinion)

grrrr
 

who cares if it's objectional, people submit skinner.exe hentai and get away with it..

Re: grrrr
 

... I forgot to make it perfectly clear that being a skinner.exe is objectionable enough in itself and should be banned...

but I'm about 2 years ahead of winamp in that way of thinking