Go Back   Winamp & Shoutcast Forums > Search Forums

Showing results 1 to 25 of 595
Search took 0.02 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: Shirow
Forum: Shoutcast Technical Support 16th June 2010, 23:46
Replies: 56
Views: 14,168
Posted By Shirow
Well, it's definitely unreachable for me so I'm...

Well, it's definitely unreachable for me so I'm guessing it's probably unreachable by the YP as well.

I'd check your firewall, etc.
Forum: Shoutcast Technical Support 16th June 2010, 21:55
Replies: 56
Views: 14,168
Posted By Shirow
I posted this in response before but the error...

I posted this in response before but the error looks accurate. http://205.188.215.229:8002 is not reachable for me. Can you get to it?
Forum: Shoutcast Technical Support 16th June 2010, 17:50
Replies: 56
Views: 14,168
Posted By Shirow
Error seems to be accurate, I cannot access...

Error seems to be accurate, I cannot access http://205.188.215.228:8002/ from the Internet either.
Forum: Shoutcast Technical Support 16th June 2010, 17:48
Replies: 56
Views: 14,168
Posted By Shirow
Because Nullsoft has made it so the primary...

Because Nullsoft has made it so the primary server has to register with the YP and your Icecast stream cannot do this.
Forum: Shoutcast Technical Support 16th June 2010, 14:52
Replies: 56
Views: 14,168
Posted By Shirow
I think you are screwed. If the master relay...

I think you are screwed. If the master relay can't touch the YP, none of the others will work.
Forum: Shoutcast Technical Support 16th June 2010, 12:21
Replies: 56
Views: 14,168
Posted By Shirow
Of course, the downside of this method is that if...

Of course, the downside of this method is that if your relays ever restart for any reason, they will probably get de-listed again....
Forum: Shoutcast Technical Support 15th June 2010, 20:01
Replies: 56
Views: 14,168
Posted By Shirow
I can confirm disabling 'RIPOnly' on my master...

I can confirm disabling 'RIPOnly' on my master server fixed the problem.. horrible change though, I assume this is a bug because it makes no sense as an intentional change.
Forum: Shoutcast Technical Support 15th June 2010, 19:56
Replies: 56
Views: 14,168
Posted By Shirow
That really sucks. I tried changing...

That really sucks. I tried changing 'PublicServer' to 'always' and leaving 'RIPOnly' to 'Yes' and it still shows my server as 'private'... I have to disable RIPOnly as well?

This is a really...
Forum: Shoutcast Technical Support 15th June 2010, 17:25
Replies: 56
Views: 14,168
Posted By Shirow
Nope, no luck. Only other thing I haven't tried...

Nope, no luck. Only other thing I haven't tried is making my master relay public but since it is for 'RIP ONLY' I don't really want to.. I guess i can try it tonight, don't want to disconnect...
Forum: Shoutcast Technical Support 15th June 2010, 15:08
Replies: 56
Views: 14,168
Posted By Shirow
This did not fix it for me. My relay servers are...

This did not fix it for me. My relay servers are already pointing to the DNS name.

My setup is:

Private master server feeds multiple public relays. I am getting the:

<06/15/10@17:35:54>...
Forum: Shoutcast Discussions 20th September 2006, 17:43
Replies: 2
Views: 1,464
Posted By Shirow
Good, Windows playlist generator?

Does one exist?

I'm looking for something that will:

Follow DMCA rules with regards to playlists
Let me insert jingles at specified intervals

Those are the minimum requirements I have......
Forum: Shoutcast Technical Support 5th April 2006, 14:21
Replies: 1
Views: 1,206
Posted By Shirow
So I thought about this for a bit and I came up...

So I thought about this for a bit and I came up with a solution for anyone else looking for a way.

iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i ethX -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT
--to-destination...
Forum: Shoutcast Technical Support 5th April 2006, 12:18
Replies: 1
Views: 1,206
Posted By Shirow
Running on port 80 without running as root

Hi,

I'm setting up a new relay on port 80. Has anyone found a way to bind sc_serv to port 80 without running it as root?
Forum: Shoutcast Technical Support 1st April 2006, 12:46
Replies: 1
Views: 1,348
Posted By Shirow
Never mind I already answered my own question. =p

Never mind I already answered my own question. =p
Forum: Shoutcast Technical Support 1st April 2006, 12:45
Replies: 1
Views: 1,348
Posted By Shirow
One server in cluster not reported on YP

I have a cluster of four servers and one of them is not reporting on the YP after I changed my master relay server.

There are no errors in the logfile of either my master relay or the relay...
Forum: Shoutcast Technical Support 14th November 2003, 13:05
Replies: 3
Views: 1,338
Posted By Shirow
Thanks, searched for sc_trans_linux a million...

Thanks, searched for sc_trans_linux a million times, looked for the wrong thing!

For future reference to anyone reading, I had a space in my AIM name.
Forum: Shoutcast Discussions 14th November 2003, 11:55
Replies: 0
Views: 792
Posted By Shirow
SC_Trans_Linux not showing in YP

nm found original post sorry
Forum: Shoutcast Technical Support 14th November 2003, 11:40
Replies: 3
Views: 1,338
Posted By Shirow
Well here's why. <11/14/03@08:08:44>...

Well here's why.

<11/14/03@08:08:44> [yp_add] yp.shoutcast.com gave error (HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request)
<11/14/03@08:08:45> [yp_add] yp.shoutcast.com gave error (HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request)...
Forum: Shoutcast Technical Support 14th November 2003, 11:26
Replies: 3
Views: 1,338
Posted By Shirow
sc_trans_linux not posting in directory

Anyone had problems using sc_trans_linux and not getting into the directory?

I tried setting public to 0 and 1 and neither seem to post it in the yp.
Forum: Shoutcast Discussions 9th December 2002, 16:51
Replies: 17
Views: 3,513
Posted By Shirow
Well, hopefully at least some of you checked out...

Well, hopefully at least some of you checked out the site - we're doing it to try and help the webcasting community. We're working on adding additional services to help both copyright owners and...
Forum: Shoutcast Discussions 4th December 2002, 14:37
Replies: 17
Views: 3,513
Posted By Shirow
There is no contract for webcasters to agree to....

There is no contract for webcasters to agree to. All you have to do is abide by the labels/copyright owners wishes (e.g. if they say 'you cannot play this song' then you have to accept that.)

The...
Forum: Shoutcast Discussions 2nd December 2002, 13:57
Replies: 17
Views: 3,513
Posted By Shirow
The only time you have to accept the license is...

The only time you have to accept the license is if you are providing material to broadcasters, not if you are a broadcaster yourself.

There is a section to list or exclude specific tracks, albums,...
Forum: Shoutcast Discussions 30th November 2002, 16:59
Replies: 17
Views: 3,513
Posted By Shirow
There is a way around it - use a service like...

There is a way around it - use a service like www.futuretrack.org. Otherwise you will be legally required to pay to play the music, unless you have permission from the copyright holder.
Forum: Shoutcast Discussions 29th November 2002, 20:55
Replies: 1
Views: 1,209
Posted By Shirow
Nobody interested? I thought getting away from...

Nobody interested? I thought getting away from being screwed by CARP/RIAA might be interesting to more webcasters... :(
Forum: Shoutcast Discussions 29th November 2002, 01:10
Replies: 1
Views: 1,209
Posted By Shirow
FutureTrack and ways around CARP

Me and a couple of other people have been working on a site that allows artists and labels to easily get their music out to the general populace. Here's our press release:

What we do
...
Showing results 1 to 25 of 595

 
Forum Jump