View Single Post
Old 14th November 2014, 18:41   #38
MRGrp
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 59
Thank you for clarifying and no apologies needed DrO.

I don't disagree with you about the best alternative version of DNAS: I don't have the necessary knowledge!
What we were running in our server (without bad "visible" results) as installed by the Centova Team, was the version Linux_x64_10_07_2011.
I don't know much more about it, and at this point I am wondering what could be the technical reason that made Centova Team prefer the Linux_x64_10_07_2011 DNAS version to the one you are suggesting.

Thank you.

best regards,

MRGrp
MRGrp is offline