View Single Post
Old 18th October 2018, 19:50   #77
Forum King
MrSinatra's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: WKPS, State College
Posts: 5,578
Send a message via AIM to MrSinatra
Originally Posted by musicf8 View Post
I would assume moving to 64bit w/ a wrapper would add tremendous size and overhead compared to what it is now (and without adding anything beneficial on the windows side), and people already complain about 5.666's footprint vs 2.x
imo, those who complain about the footprint of winamp are barking at the moon. i mean come on, winamp is nothing compared to other apps. yes, it should be size efficient. make the core app as small as possible and make as much of it plugin optional as possible. but please, lets not stop progress b/c we don't like change, and or be silly about size on disk. this is no longer 1998.

BUG #1 = Winamp skips short tracks
Wish #1 = Multiple Column Sorting
Wish #2 = Add TCMP/Compilation editing
MrSinatra is offline   Reply With Quote