View Single Post
Old 8th June 2004, 11:23   #17
Bahram A.
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Iran (Rudehen-Tehran-Iran)
Posts: 12
Thanks to all...

-Thanks to all...

-I require all the friends don't use many interjections or slang words: My language isn't English, I don't live among English-speaking people and I can not understand expressions beyond my oxford pocket dictionary! I try to use correct words and sentences, so hope you answer me as formal as possible, Thanks.



-WHEREamI (Major Dude):

Thank you for your information.



-deeder7001 (Major Dude):

Yes, In fact, Winamp is an excellent player for mp3; Its CPU usage is on the lowest value when playing mp3. Thanks.



-amano (Major Dude):

1) If you say that:
"Winamp uses codecs that are installed on your systems",
Then I guess that the difference of performance between Winamp and MediaPlayer is why that Winamp skips bad media pretty well but MediaPlayer can't (Winamp makes more process on data).

2)In all VCDs, Mpeg tracks has a .dat extention; Who is blameworthy?

3) 0.1 second takes 1MB, 10 times greater than one allowed in winamp forum!

4) If you are sure, I am sorry!



-toejam07 (Junior Member):

That wasn't "DJ Egg", but was "Twilightseer" (Moderator) who said:
"...otherwise, you'll end up banned"
(see his/her reply).

Can you please tell more about your sponsored links? What can I find there?



-DrO (Moderator):

Thank you for your reply.



-shins (Member):

Can you please speak more about "bsplayer" and "lackluster"? Thanks.



-DJ Egg (Moderator):

Thank you for your reply; In addition, I can tell you similar things I already written to "amano" and "toejam07".



-UltraZelda64 (Senior Member):

Even if your system is fast (PIII or above), minimum load on CPU when playing multi-media is preferred.



-DrO (Moderator):

Thank you for your reply; In addition, I can tell you similar things I already written to "amano".
Bahram A. is offline   Reply With Quote