View Single Post
Old 27th April 2012, 16:34   #5
Forum King
MrSinatra's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: WKPS, State College
Posts: 5,715
Send a message via AIM to MrSinatra
Originally Posted by Batter Pudding View Post
tl;dr. If you were to follow the Apple mantra you would not have a 15 year old Winamp. Microsoft is about legacy support. Apple is about buying new kit. This is a discussion for a different thread. If there is a mod reading this I suggest this 64bit conversation is split off to a new thread so as not to confuse this original issue any more than is needed.
i agree, starting with your post 126. i also agree that apple does what it does b/c its about buying new kit, but that hardly has been an unsuccessful strategy. microsoft is, imo, on the verge on becoming completely ghetto, if not dead altogether.

i disagree that there would not be a winamp. itunes has gone thru all these changes, and been just fine. so could winamp.

BUG #1 = Winamp skips short tracks
Wish #1 = Multiple Column Sorting
Wish #2 = Add TCMP/Compilation editing
MrSinatra is offline   Reply With Quote