|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Major Dude
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Leipzig / Germany
Posts: 859
|
Another GC Threat: AVS + Parhelia
I'm planning to buy a Parhelia because of the VJ'ing possibillities with AVS. Triple Head on one Graphic card is just too cool (or dual DVI instead).
![]() Does anyone has experiences with Parhelia, especially how the multiple out works? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Major Dude
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 787
|
i dont know anything about video cards. wait I already said something like that before...so theres no point going into detail...post pump
http://home.iitb.ac*****~shreyaspotnis |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum King
|
That does look nice.
http://www.matrox.com/mga/products/parhelia/home.cfm Never used the card, but dual-head on my GeForce4 is nice. Triple-head is even better. This card looks like it might be good for gaming as well - does anyone know if it would be better than the GeForce FX for gaming? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 181
|
Triple head...drll...
You'd need a hell of a system to be able to use triple head to any advantage (imagine running resolume/vjo/avs and some realtime 3d bs on your comp at the same time...) Have you got an 8XAGP motherboard? The TV out looks pretty good also as I lose a bit of quality/sharpness on my radeon. I'd go it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Major Dude
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Leipzig / Germany
Posts: 859
|
No only 4*
You can even do Suround Gaming! But thats not the point, just imagine: -Screen one: AVS Edit Window + additional control tool -Screen two: AVS Fullscreen Preview -Screen three: Output to Beamer *drool* |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Bin King
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,179
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Major Dude
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Leipzig / Germany
Posts: 859
|
We ok, gam ing quality is another point but with fracment anti aliasing it's just below GF4.6, which i consider as fairly enough 3d power.
And anyway, Tug, you don't need a "Gaming" Card, this would only keep you form AVS'ing
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 181
|
Screen one: hotlist running avs (nice)
Screen two: sound triggered video looper (flowmotion) live mixing avs Screen three: synced output to beamer scr1&2 (flowmotion'wka wkow' *porno sound track noise* actually I had a quick play on this system last night: p4 2.6ghz 8XAGP Asus mboard 2.0 gig ddr pc 400 scsi raid 0 cannopus dvstorm |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Forum King
|
Quote:
btw for the record my specs are: IP4 3.06GHz Radeon 9000 Pro 128MB 256MB DDR2700(Dual Channel PC333) 140GB HDD Space On my 'shopping' list at the moment is the Verto GeForce FX 5800 Ultra and 3.0GB RAM. I expect I'll have them in about two months. ![]() Before you start planning out your multiple display arrangements let me first inform you of three major problems you will encounter: 1.) AVS fullscreen will kill anything running on the other two displays or make it unusable by stopping whenever click the mouse. 2.) Expect difficulties in making windows output to three monitors simultaneously... I had enormous difficulties in getting my two monitors and tv to work together, so many difficulties that i just gave up. 3.) The overlay will only be drawn on one screen meaning that some fullscreen video displays (Windows Media Player or Winamp3 for example) will only be able to output to the primary display device. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum King
|
The reason you couldn't get your 2 monitors and tv to work together is probably because that card is double headed(I believe). You can only output to two displays at once.
Thanks for your view on this, Jheriko. I didn't know exactly how good this would be at gaming - figured it was probably mainly for doing extreme 3Dgraphics editing, but I wasn't sure. Perhaps the biggest reason tv's are hard to read off of is because they only have a max resolution of 640x480(or is it 800x600?). Coupled with interlacing, it can be very difficult to read small text. The HDTV's do work well though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 181
|
No the deinterlacing/colour conversion stuffs the output resolution (which varies whether its NTSC or PAL output). I can run dvd's through it no problems - but the card converts 32bit colour to pal output which drops sharpness. Perhaps a scan converter issue but I haven't had time too look into it too much.
Either way all these options look better than my radeon 7500. Matrox have a much better reputation for professional graphics solutions and linear editing - Ive never had a problem with one and you're probably not going to need the 3d grunt of a radeon for 2d/video outputs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum King
|
Yeah, but if your doing a lot of gaming, then that will be very useful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 181
|
lol
I haven't played a game since... god knows when! Theres too much fun stuff to do! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum King
|
Um, like what? Games are Grrrrrreat! So is AVS!
Sorry for the Tony the Tiger impersonation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 181
|
I know - I used to live in a house that was networked with four other houses. At one stage we had 30 computers linked up... cat5 running allover the place. Imagine the gaming! They're too damn addictive.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|