Old 27th February 2004, 03:38   #1
Omega X
Forum King
 
Omega X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: A Parallel Dimension
Posts: 2,253
Send a message via AIM to Omega X Send a message via Yahoo to Omega X
Windows Xp "Reloaded" ?!?!

Seems that someone at microsoft is worried about people not upgrading to Longhorn.

Cnet Article
Omega X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2004, 03:09   #2
mikeflca
Major Dude
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: san diego, california.
Posts: 623
I think its more along the lines of Microsoft being worried that people might start looking at Linux.....
mikeflca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th February 2004, 18:59   #3
Mr_007
Banned
 
Mr_007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,838
oh really microsoft update windows xp?
Mr_007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2004, 17:39   #4
devils night
Senior Member
 
devils night's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: your mama
Posts: 306
yikes! i hope it won't be another windows ME

Proud Winamp user since 1997
(Winamp 1.006)
devils night is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2004, 23:06   #5
fwgx
Rudolf the Red.
(Forum King)
 
fwgx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 9,314
They need to keep the money comming in. Longhorn is a long way off yet, XP sales falling as more people already have it, people not getting XP because they're waiting for Longhorn etc etc.

"We think science is interesting and if you disagree, you can fuck off."
fwgx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2004, 17:48   #6
eleet-2k2
Forum King
 
eleet-2k2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Mobil Ave.
Posts: 5,381
Well, in any case, all my new systems from now on will be either dual-boot linux & windows, where each OS is on a separate physical drive, or purely linux. I will still however have to keep MS around for communication reasons and for programs I use. :/

"Welcome to the Island of people who know too much."..."Did you really think balloons would stop him?!"
See what I'm listening too.
eleet-2k2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2004, 19:19   #7
d0rk
I contribute nothing.
(Forum King)
 
d0rk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Virgacalementoflagantionio
Posts: 3,030
I dont think many people are holding off getting XP because Longhorn is coming soon. Longhorn might be out in 2005, so that means 1 year+ until the release. If I had an older OS I would get XP now, and then maybe update to longhorn. Also, the people who are going to be interested in getting LongHorn ASAP most likly have XP right now anyway.

I came for the hatred.
I stayed for the ballbag.
d0rk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2004, 23:19   #8
rpxmaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 174
Wow...some people sure do forget that they're not supposed to buy software the day it comes out. They're supposed to wait a few months until they find something terribly wrong with it.
rpxmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2004, 01:39   #9
mikeflca
Major Dude
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: san diego, california.
Posts: 623
....and you can find it for a smaller price or for free online.
mikeflca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2004, 01:58   #10
spiderbaby1958
Major Dude
 
spiderbaby1958's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 791
Quote:
Originally posted by eleet-2k2
Well, in any case, all my new systems from now on will be either dual-boot linux & windows, where each OS is on a separate physical drive, or purely linux. I will still however have to keep MS around for communication reasons and for programs I use. :/
I'm dual booting Red Hat Linux 9 and Windows98.

I like to think of 98 as "the last Windows you'll ever need." I've never found any Windows applications that won't work with it, so why on earth would I want to upgrade? Microsoft doesn't need my money. By the time 98 is finally obsolete, I should be able to use Linux for all applications.

XP? Longhorn? Not in this life.
spiderbaby1958 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2004, 08:43   #11
fwgx
Rudolf the Red.
(Forum King)
 
fwgx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 9,314
NTFS alone is reason enough to upgrade I'd say.

d0rk: There are plenty of businesses still running NT-4 quite happily who will not want to upgrade to 2k just intime for it to become obsolete.

"We think science is interesting and if you disagree, you can fuck off."
fwgx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2004, 13:29   #12
spiderbaby1958
Major Dude
 
spiderbaby1958's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 791
Quote:
Originally posted by Phily Baby
NTFS alone is reason enough to upgrade I'd say.

Not when I'm running Linux 75 per cent of the time.
spiderbaby1958 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2004, 16:38   #13
s1138
Alumni?
 
s1138's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: joja
Posts: 6,936
Send a message via ICQ to s1138 Send a message via AIM to s1138 Send a message via Yahoo to s1138
watch out...in alittle while they will release

WindowsXP "REVOLUTIONS"

i think this version is parallell to Win98SE

s1138 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th March 2004, 00:57   #14
Starbucks
Forum King
 
Starbucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Forums
Posts: 2,685
I'm gonna try to get a free legal full version upgrade of Longhorn through MSSB.
Starbucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th March 2004, 02:28   #15
rpxmaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 174
Quote:
Originally posted by Phily Baby
NTFS alone is reason enough to upgrade I'd say.
NTFS alone is a reason not to upgrade, in my opinion...especially if you're dual-booting Windoze/Linux, like I do. When it's patents you're concerned about, then it's questionable whether Microsoft even owns the rights to NTFS, or FAT even since they claim they own it. For this reason, Redhat and SuSE have said that they will not put NTFS write support in their distros.
rpxmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th March 2004, 19:37   #16
Merlin
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
(Forum King)
 
Merlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Manchester
Posts: 4,209
Will "Reloaded" be worse than the original by trying to look intelligent but coming across as tired, overblown and crass? Will it then be followed by an even worse version called
Quote:
Originally posted by s1138
WindowsXP "REVOLUTIONS"
? Will it all cause people to say that Windows XP was good enough in the first place, and the two sequels were an overblown waste of money that's not in the least bit entertaining?

I don't know. At least it's not being directed by the Wachowski brothers.


as he faced the sun, he cast no shadow
Merlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th March 2004, 19:42   #17
zootm
Forum King
 
zootm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: the nether reaches of bonnie scotland
Posts: 13,375
Quote:
Originally posted by rpxmaster
NTFS alone is a reason not to upgrade, in my opinion...especially if you're dual-booting Windoze/Linux, like I do. When it's patents you're concerned about, then it's questionable whether Microsoft even owns the rights to NTFS, or FAT even since they claim they own it. For this reason, Redhat and SuSE have said that they will not put NTFS write support in their distros.
if you're only using windows, however, NTFS is a fantastic filesystem.

zootm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th March 2004, 20:22   #18
fwgx
Rudolf the Red.
(Forum King)
 
fwgx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 9,314
Quote:
Originally posted by zootm
if you're only using windows, however, NTFS is a fantastic filesystem.
Which was my point. It's far superior to FAT32.

"We think science is interesting and if you disagree, you can fuck off."
fwgx is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Winamp & Shoutcast Forums > Community Center > Breaking News

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump