|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
|
Two new presets
These are two presets I made for GHz2.
Can anyone tell me how to make Analyze This work on any resolution coz' it only works normally on x * y<=396 ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Major Dude
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 580
|
what is it supposed to look like?
If you can't say something nice, say something surrealistic. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 272
|
try messing with the -.99 and the -1.01.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Junior Member
|
It's a 2d timescope, made with two superscopes. Hey, make your res. like 320*200 if you can to see it. Oh and btw., I used a little bit of AVSTrans in particle cube. Neat program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Major Dude
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 580
|
Thanks
![]() Here's a (very simple) timescope. set the speed with reg00 in the Dynamic Shift (integer values only, bilinear filtering would destroy the timescope) You could add that fadeout effect of your preset with a buffer blend using a gradient in the blend buffer [edit] an idea for the Particle Cube: make the cube rotate without the particles, simulating the inertia of the particles. [/edit] Last edited by TomyLobo; 25th March 2004 at 21:00. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Major Dude
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 580
|
this time with the attachment
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Junior Member
|
Quote:
By subtracting from the rotation values (cx,sz, etc.) The particles would rotate with the cube, but would be a little bit behind. Can you explain what you meant in code? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Major Dude
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 580
|
no, it was just a (crazy) idea
![]() i meant that the particles are not rotated but bounce off the boundaries of the rotated cube If you can't say something nice, say something surrealistic. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|