Go Back   Winamp Forums > Winamp > Winamp Wishlist

View Poll Results: Should SRS WOW/Trubass (or functionally identical DSP processing) be part of Winamp?
Yes, this should be built into Winamp 9 37.50%
Yes, this should be built into Winamp PRO 3 12.50%
No, Winamp sounds great as it is and doesn't need any DSP enhancements 12 50.00%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 14th September 2004, 11:02   #1
g3b
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18
SRS WOW and Trubass effects built in (Winamp Pro?)

I would love to see the inclusion of SRS Wow and Trubass DSP effects as part of Winamp proper rather than plugins.

There is, for example, SRS WOW XT plugin for Windows Media Player (info at srs.com).

I am currently using the old SRS Wowthing plugin for winamp (which hasn't been developed since 1999). This works really well, and an updated version integrated into winamp would (in my opinion) be a great addition to Winamp (or possibly as a feature for Winamp Pro users to encourage uptake of the pro licence).

I have added a poll for other users to give feedback on this idea. Comments appreciated.

Thanks,

Grant
g3b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2004, 11:08   #2
g3b
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18
Oh, and I have allowed multiple choice in the poll to allow users to check both "Add to Winamp" and "Add to Winamp PRO". I trust that noone will be tempted to check a both a "Yes" and "No option.
g3b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2004, 11:38   #3
gaekwad2
Foorum King
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: bar2000
Posts: 11,149
Reasons why I voted no
  • I hate DSPs
  • The amount of choice here
  • I hate DSPs
  • People complain about the download size already
  • I hate DSPs
  • "Winamp 5: the final edition (for now)"
  • Did I mention that I hate DSPs?

Fuck this place.
gaekwad2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2004, 11:41   #4
g3b
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18
I agree that there is some choice available, for people who are intelligent enough to look around. However, in my opinion including great sound processing enhancements is closer to winamp's core functionality than "cd rippin' and burnin'" will ever be

Did I mention I love DSPs?
g3b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2004, 11:57   #5
gaekwad2
Foorum King
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: bar2000
Posts: 11,149
People who are too dumb to look around usually use WMP.

Well, in addition to lite and full they could make a stuffed version to compete with iTunes, MMJB and WMP in terms of download size and bloat.

Fuck this place.
gaekwad2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2004, 13:08   #6
DJ Egg
Techorator
Winamp Team
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 35,129
SRS Wow is a patented & registered trademark, and inclusion of this 3rd-party plugin in Winamp Pro would cause the price of Pro to increase by about $10. It could NEVER be included in the free version of Winamp :/

Not to mention that it'd add an extra 8mb to the installer...

I guess we should be thankful that SRS still allows us to download and use their old plugin for free.
DJ Egg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2004, 13:16   #7
g3b
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18
Thanks for your comments DJ Egg. I assumed that someone would raise this point. How much does it cost to have SRS WOW and Trubass in Windows Media Player?

Zip...Nada...Zero.

Yes, I know WMP sucks and that Microsoft pours lots of money into its "free" products, but it DOES have SRS Wow/Trubass for FREE.

I think that it is misleading to presume that SRS Wow/Trubass in Winamp would add $10.00 to the price. Unless, that is, know for a fact that the Nullsoft have already liaised with SRS on this matter, and SRS has said "It'll cost you $10.00 per installation". I very much doubt that this has occurred.

My opinion is that having SRS Wow/Trubass as part of Winamp (PRO) should at least be seriously explored. I presume that nullsoft could get the effect added for a very low price per unit--certainly not $10.00.
g3b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2004, 13:17   #8
g3b
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18
Oh, an DJ Egg, it would add around 800kb to the installer, not 8mb, so you are out by a factor of 10

;-)

Edit: I assume with leaner coding, it could be even less.
g3b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2004, 15:08   #9
sanosuke
Major Dude
 
sanosuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,891
Quote:
Originally posted by g3b
How much does it cost to have SRS WOW and Trubass in Windows Media Player?

Zip...Nada...Zero.
The cost is already included when you buy windows.
Quote:
Originally posted by g3b

Oh, an DJ Egg, it would add around 800kb to the installer, not 8mb, so you are out by a factor of 10

;-)
Have you downloaded windows media player 10 (or 9) before?

Big-assed signature deleted by errr.. whats his name again??
sanosuke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2004, 19:15   #10
g3b
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18
I take your point sanosuke about the cost of Windows covering SRS effects in WMP. I would be interested to see how much cost it would actually add to have the plugin as part of Winamp -- or at least to encourage SRS to continue developing and supporting their third party plugin.

I do not agree that the size of WMP 10 or 9 is due to the SRS effects. I quote from the documentation for version 1.0g of the SRS WOWThing for Winamp:

"Q: How large is the plug-in?
A: The entire program is just over 800k once installed."

This of course includes the 'funky' graphical GUI, which could be stripped away to further reduce the size.

My point is that:

1. WMP9+ sounds NOTICEABLY better than Winamp purely due to it having SRS effects.
2. This could be rectified if Winamp had SRS effects.

I'm not trying to dis winamp because I've used it for years, but from a listening perspective, WMP sounds significantly better with SRS. I guarantee that, in a blind test, most users would pick the WMP sound as "better/clearer/richer" than the Winamp sound.
g3b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2004, 21:46   #11
drewbar
Sawg 2.0
Major Dude
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,917
People can download a plug-in on their own. If they can't, then that is their problem. The plug-in and plenty other DSP plug-ins are available for download. If that is too hard for them they are free to use WMP. Less stupid people coming around here who thinks every plug-in ever made should come "integrated" with Winamp.

Count with us!
Jan 1st, 12AM (PST, GMT -8) 2010 - 282,246
drewbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2004, 22:30   #12
g3b
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally posted by drewbar
People can download a plug-in on their own. If they can't, then that is their problem. The plug-in and plenty other DSP plug-ins are available for download. If that is too hard for them they are free to use WMP. Less stupid people coming around here who thinks every plug-in ever made should come "integrated" with Winamp.
1. I agree that people can download the plugin on their own.
2. If it is not possible to incorporate SRS DSP into Winamp proper, I think that at the very least SRS should be encouraged to continue developing and supporting an SRS WOW/Trubass product for Winamp so that people can "download the plugin on their own". The SRS DSP plugin makes a fantastic difference to the perceived sound reproduction in my opinion.
3. I don't entirely understand your comment "Less stupid people coming around here who thinks every plug-in ever made should come "integrated" with Winamp.". If you mean what I assume you mean, I am not one of those people that thinks Winamp should come with every plugin ever made. HOwever, being that Winamp's primary functionality is music playback, having kickass sound reproduction should be a requirement rather than an option. As mentioned above, I think that adding features such as "CD Burning" is further removed to music playback than SRS DSP functionality.
g3b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2004, 22:42   #13
DJ Egg
Techorator
Winamp Team
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 35,129
I'm only going by the link you posted...

Buy Now - $9.99
Download trial - 8mb

And as pointed out by Sanosuke, WiMP is NOT free, you pay for it (and the SRS plugin) when you buy Windows.


We already have a free version. Yes, it's old (from 2000), but it works and is only 824kb... and that is the best you're ever gonna get for Winamp. The new version of SRS Wow will NEVER be included by default with Winamp.
End of story.
DJ Egg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2004, 23:36   #14
g3b
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18
For your information, I contacted SRS labs about this, and have just received a reply from them stating that they do not have any plans to further develop or support any winamp plugins.

It is good to hear your opinion DJ Egg. I had hoped other users would be supportive of my suggestion, but it seems this is not the case. That is a shame and, I think, a lost opportunity for enhancing Winamp.
g3b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2004, 23:53   #15
UltraZelda64
Senior Member
 
UltraZelda64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alliance, Ohio
Posts: 390
"And as pointed out by Sanosuke, WiMP is NOT free, you pay for it (and the SRS plugin) when you buy Windows."

Yes, you pay for WMP 8 or whatever verion it is... then all updates are free, unless they decide to not develop a new version for an older OS... my disc came with WMP8, I previously upgraded to 9, and currently use 10. For 300 bucks (Professional), they'd better give free updates.
UltraZelda64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2004, 23:58   #16
g3b
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 18
Does anyone find it amusing that, yes, you do have to have windows to get Windows Media Player with its lovely SRS effects but yes, you also have to have windows to get Winamp!!!!
g3b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2004, 00:48   #17
electricmime
Major Dude
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 991
but winamp doesnt come with windows, nor is it offered by microsoft... you also have to have windows to play many games, and you have to have windows to do alot of things... but they arent paid for by microsoft/their cost isnt covered by the price of windows...

besides, srs probably wouldnt have been able to make a deal due to contracts with microsoft anyway, and i wouldnt call it a lost opportunity, since it wasnt really an opportunity to begin with.. a lost opportunity would be if they offered to make it for winamp and winamp told them no

(also, there is a macamp, though its out of date and has been abandoned)

There is no reset button on life... but the graphics kick ass
electricmime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2004, 01:04   #18
gaekwad2
Foorum King
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: bar2000
Posts: 11,149
Quote:
Originally posted by g3b
Does anyone find it amusing that, yes, you do have to have windows to get Windows Media Player with its lovely SRS effects but yes, you also have to have windows to get Winamp!!!!
Maybe you should argue with the makers of SRS WOW that you already paid for it by paying for Windows and therefore are entitled to having them integrate it for free into any media player out there.

Fuck this place.
gaekwad2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2004, 01:13   #19
DJ Egg
Techorator
Winamp Team
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 35,129
Quote:
Originally posted by g3b
For your information, I contacted SRS labs about this, and have just received a reply from them stating that they do not have any plans to further develop or support any winamp plugins.

It is good to hear your opinion DJ Egg. I had hoped other users would be supportive of my suggestion, but it seems this is not the case. That is a shame and, I think, a lost opportunity for enhancing Winamp.
Don't get us wrong. We'd all love there to be a free updated SRS Wow plugin for Winamp (not that there's anything wrong with the old free one)... but you said it yourself, SRS have no plans to further update their Winamp plugin, and no-one else can develop it except for SRS. So it doesn't matter if we're supportive or not, because it ain't gonna happen anyway :/

Besides, there's plenty of other free DSP plugins which are as good as (if not better than) SRS Wow anyway. Heh.
DJ Egg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2004, 05:07   #20
UltraZelda64
Senior Member
 
UltraZelda64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alliance, Ohio
Posts: 390
Yeah, like Enhancer... unfortunately, it seems that it's been abandoned too...
UltraZelda64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2004, 23:07   #21
Professor Tom
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: behind my computer
Posts: 32
Hey I love WOW thing and couple it with Dee 2 via DSP stacker. I'm at a loss of how there are other better plugins. Define better.
Professor Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2004, 23:25   #22
DJ Egg
Techorator
Winamp Team
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 35,129
God knows. I don't use any dsp plugins. Winamp sounds awesome enough without them.

I just use the Winamp EQ, and three outputs from the M-Audio Revo soundcard... two to Labtec 5.1 speakers, the 3rd to 20-band mixer eq -to- hifi amp -to- quadrophonic mordaunt short speakers.

The neighbors love me.
DJ Egg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2004, 23:29   #23
Professor Tom
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: behind my computer
Posts: 32
thanks. I thought you might have had a plugin in mind
Professor Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2004, 23:47   #24
DJ Egg
Techorator
Winamp Team
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 35,129
Well, I've tried a few in my time... eg. Dee3, Enhancer, Wide & Dynamix, Wow Thing, iZotope Ozone, Hi Fi 3 Surround Effect, Virtuoso, Arboretum Realizer, AmazingReverbV2, Spatializer...
but as I said, I honestly don't need any of them.
DJ Egg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2007, 15:49   #25
free4eveeer
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 9
hey i wanna ask something .. SRS WOW effect used to work well on my old winamp 2.8 .. when i installed the new v 5 winamp i find it working but no interface .. there is no more something called "the window of WOW" .. when i go to options --> "effects" i find it but i cannot open it anymore to change bass and treble effects .. any ideas ?
free4eveeer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th March 2007, 17:15   #26
DJ Egg
Techorator
Winamp Team
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 35,129
You might need to switch to the classic skin first (instead of modern)
and then enable the plugin.

By the way, I see SRS have removed the old plugin from winamp.com,
so I've mirrored it here.
DJ Egg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2007, 09:40   #27
Professor Tom
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: behind my computer
Posts: 32
Quote:
I hate DSPs The amount of choice here I hate DSPs People complain about the download size already I hate DSPs "Winamp 5: the final edition (for now)" Did I mention that I hate DSPs?
I don't get it. Does he hate DSPs or not?
Professor Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2007, 09:33   #28
free4eveeer
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 9
thnx

thnx
free4eveeer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Winamp Forums > Winamp > Winamp Wishlist

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump