Old 17th January 2008, 21:19   #1
carlhe
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: bellevue, wa usa
Posts: 1
Auto-update vs Download option

I am tired of having to do a full install every time Winamp does an incremental update. Most video games these days will perform an update check upon startup (winamp should do it once a month, or so) and automatically update the software. Diablo 2 and Hellgate London are the best examples of this behavior, not to mention Microsoft.

For Winamp, there could be an option to auto update the app whenever there is an update. I dont want to have to download anything, run an installer, blah blah blah!
if its important enough to perform throw out an update, then just update it!
carlhe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2008, 14:15   #2
homes32
Senior Member
 
homes32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: MN
Posts: 288
Quote:
Most video games these days will perform an update check upon startup (winamp should do it once a month, or so)...
assuming you have the check box enabled (prefs >general prefs > check for new versions on startup) Winamp checks for updates each time you start it.

Quote:
I am tired of having to do a full install every time Winamp does an incremental update.
if you look at the change logs most of the time most of the core plugins and such are all updated, when Winamp puts out a release its just that, a release, not just a quick patch. so you end up downloading the whole package anyway.

an auto update system has been talked about many many times but it raised too many support issues and the staff dosn't have enough resources to handle it.

you can read these threads for more info
http://forums.winamp.com/showthread....hreadid=246034
http://forums.winamp.com/showthread....hreadid=248154

homes32
homes32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2008, 16:06   #3
MrRobot
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 33
Send a message via ICQ to MrRobot
Yeah, an incremental update is a lot of extra work and maintenance. This also brings more confussion, more effort to identify problems etc.

But an auto download and install would be useful.
MrRobot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2008, 17:07   #4
homes32
Senior Member
 
homes32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: MN
Posts: 288
Quote:
Originally posted by MrRobot
Yeah, an incremental update is a lot of extra work and maintenance. This also brings more confussion, more effort to identify problems etc.
you have no idea what you are talking about do you?

homes32
homes32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2008, 17:01   #5
Koopa
16-Bit Moderator
 
Koopa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,341
He is right, an incremental update is really much more work, plus it would make the work for the translators much more difficult too.

The Winamp package is always tested internal as one thing, so we can at least make sure, that everybody has the same Version and the same plugins, when a bug is reported.

It would end up in tons of tech support request, if somebody has this version of in_mp3, another person has another version of in_mp3. From a tech support point of view, this would bring more confusion.
Koopa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2009, 09:42   #6
uwnav
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1
I see the hurdles mentioned in the threads, but SERIOUSLY, this issue needs to be bumped!

In terms of opting out of certain things, the user has clearly done so during the initial install; why is every update treated as a fresh install (requiring re-opting-out) lawyers lacking distinction between upgrades and installs?

Regardless, just firing up the browser, downloading the file, running it, realizing you have to close winamp, finishing the install, re-opening winamp. This is incredibly annoying, and as a software developer I know this is a very very solvable problem. It saves a ton of hassle that the end-user would really appreciate. Isn't that the whole purpose of Winamp, to make the end-user experience as good as possible?

Even if the auto-updater just downloaded the entire installer, and updated all the binaries automatically, without having to click through the million pages of the installer. updating would become significantly less of a pain in the you know what, and as end-users, we would GREATLY appreciate it
uwnav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2011, 19:18   #7
Techno Spice
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1
I'd like to bump this recommendation. If incremental updates are such a pain, is it still too difficult to integrate and automatic installer so you don't have to open the website, download, and then reinstall? Regular users would see no difference between an 'update' and a one-click installer that simply stops all winamp processes, updates then install, and then prompts the user if they want to start winamp or not? You can even have your legal agreement prompt that initiates the install by clicking 'I accept' at the beginning. Lots of programs that update core files do this as well.
Techno Spice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2011, 05:50   #8
stopasking
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 446
I wish for an update function as well. I have ticked the box to check for updates, but it doesn't seem to work.

The Filehippo Update Checker tool reports a new version, Winamp itself doesn't tell me anything.
stopasking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2011, 06:30   #9
DrO
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 27,873
because there is a delay in when the update flag gets flipped after a release so any important issues with a new release can be resolved before people get the update notice. quite sensible when you think about it.

-daz
DrO is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Winamp & Shoutcast Forums > Winamp > Winamp Wishlist

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump