|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 142
|
Safari 3.1 so fast
I download and try the new Safari (3.1), woow reallu fast!
I just wish it has groups and aliases ![]() Any opinion about new Safari browser? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
\m/
(Forum King) |
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum King
|
Plus Safari on Windows is just poo. There is no reason to not be using Firefox, or Opera if that is your thing.
If you really want to go crazy, Swift: http://try.swift.ws/ Native Windows WebKit based Browser. (Webkit is the thing below Safari that actually renders pages, equivalent to Firefox's Gecko) | Brought to you by ^V ^C | The one... the original... no seriously! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
\m/
(Forum King) |
Also, links works rather well
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 142
|
In my PC Safari is, by far, much more faster, twice at least.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
\m/
(Forum King) |
Faster than what? Firefox? Maybe. Opera? I don't think so.
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Foorum King
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: bar2000
Posts: 11,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,839
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Nothing to say...
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 23,098
|
Only in a 90's kind of way though...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
not fucked, not quite.
(Forum King) |
That's like old lady fast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
\m/
(Forum King) |
Also, the following is quite fast:
matt@Ragnarok ~ $ telnet forums.winamp.com 80 Trying 205.188.229.24... Connected to forums.gforums.winamp.com. Escape character is '^]'. GET / HTTP 1.0 Incidentally, anyone know what the gforums subdomain is? Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Major Dude
|
Safari is teh suck on Windows though, its slower than anything, doesn't follow the native interface and the fonts are all screwy
Cooky560 - Making Pointless Posts since 8/12/ 2002 WWW. Victory Requires no explanation, defeat allows none. All that Evil needs to triumph is for good men to do nothing |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Got his CT back
and didn't pay $10 (Forum King) Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,583
|
Try using it in Windows 3.1.
This is a sig of some nature. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Forum King
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
\m/
(Forum King) |
Fair point. Note that I'm not against Firefox in any way. I still use it most of the time, but I do like Opera quite a bit.
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum King
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: the nether reaches of bonnie scotland
Posts: 13,375
|
Safari is a neat browser but the Windows version is dreadful. The font and widget rendering make it look terrible in the context of a Windows desktop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Rudolf the Red.
(Forum King) Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 9,314
|
I'd like to use Safari on Windows, but I'm waiting for a version that will work with workgroups.
"We think science is interesting and if you disagree, you can fuck off." |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum King
|
Safari 3.11 for Workgroups?
| Brought to you by ^V ^C | The one... the original... no seriously! |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
(Major Dude)
isn't very custom Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 2,004
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Forum King
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3
|
Sounds like apple is well on its way to world domination... i just dont get it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
not fucked, not quite.
(Forum King) |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: (-1)^(1/2)
Posts: 436
|
At least they can manage money.
present day present time |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
not fucked, not quite.
(Forum King) |
They need to manage some into my wallet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Flakmonkey!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DM-Campgrounds
Posts: 1,870
|
IE was only made to download Firefox or Opera, whichever you like better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Junior Member
|
I use the built-in Winamp browser.
Ha, no, not really. I'm using FF3b5 right now. But none of the current stable releases can render the Acid3 Test, so they all suck. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
\m/
(Forum King) |
Webkit and Opera sure blow FF out of the water, though.
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
|
Been really thingking about using Opera lately and just might have to download it tonight after reading about. I usually bounce back and forth between IE and FF.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Flakmonkey!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DM-Campgrounds
Posts: 1,870
|
i used opera for a while but somehow switched back to ff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Foorum King
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: bar2000
Posts: 11,457
|
I have too many extensions that offer functionality Opera doesn't, and (spot check for xzxzzx) I still hate the way it handles tabs.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|