Old 16th January 2015, 08:20   #1
RpK
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 7
Linux Limiter for SC / calendar.xml 3:30h repeat events

#1 Does someone use a sound limiter in conjunction with shoutcast? problem: when the live dj try too push the volume then there are sometimes "scratches" audible

#2 could someone give me a tip for 3:30h repeat events? im using diz right now:
code:
<event type="playlist">
<playlist loopatend="0" shuffle="0" priority="20">rampage</playlist>
<calendar starttime="01:00:00" duration="00:05:00" timeoffset="03:30:00" repeat="128"/>
</event>


but it does everything except of this what i want.. ^^

cheers fam
RpK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2015, 09:40   #2
neralex
Major Dude
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 576
Sorry, but if a DJ can't hold his volume to a "normal" level then you should give him a instruction for that. If the DJ can't hold it again is it really bad DJ and you should think about to kick him/her from the stream. A "live" software limiter would costs a lot of performance and wouldn't makes sense. There exists a lot of hardware limiter for the client's end.

The transcoder is not more supported and if i'm right then had this function with the timeoffset never worked correctly. Don't forget that the transcoder was everytime a BETA version. The playlists are running until the last file is ended. So i would create simply a playlist with exactly this playtime and then you don't need the timeoffset.
neralex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2015, 10:46   #3
RpK
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 7
#1 it isnt the dj its the quality of different mp3/wav/whatever music.. and ive a lot of ressources on my server (8 cores & 32gb ram so nvm..) we just have great exp. djs who are playing every week live on different locations so pls stop with something like this if you dont know anything of it.... i know too that the djs could do it with a limiter on their devices but i wanna control it over the server (if its possible.. my linux skills arent the best) and ye things that i have already known.. but thanks for the answer
RpK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2015, 15:17   #4
jaromanda
Forum King
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Under the bridge
Posts: 2,290
if the stream is "over cooked" at the source, there's feck all you can do on the receiving end of the stream ... the damage has been done, it's called clipping, "information" has been lost and there's no recovering from it, you could have 100 cores and terabytes of RAM, and it'll still sound like a wogs car stereo

p.s. "great exp djs" aren't that "great" or "exp" if they play music that "clips" - that's my 2 shekels worth

"If you don't like DNAS, write your own damn system"

So I did
jaromanda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2015, 17:06   #5
RpK
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 7
why is it so difficult to get just an answer of my question.. i dont need explanations!
the guy who played the first time over our radio (with the scratches) is a well known local dj in bratislava/sk.. dunno maybe it was his mistake but idc.. so your whole answer means "no i dont know about a limiter between audio input from an external source to audio output to the listeners"

"sound limiter" question is done here.. BACK TO TOPIC --> calender events
RpK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2015, 22:54   #6
jaromanda
Forum King
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Under the bridge
Posts: 2,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by RpK View Post
why is it so difficult to get just an answer of my question.. i dont need explanations!
what makes you think you don't need explanations? you clearly misunderstood the answer given
Quote:
so your whole answer means "no i dont know about a limiter between audio input from an external source to audio output to the listeners"
actually, no. My whole answer is "a limiter would not fix the problem at the point you want to put the limiter" - have you heard the phrase "shutting the gate after the horse has bolted"

Quote:
BACK TO TOPIC
your first question was about limiting, I apologise for giving an answer that was more than "no" - given that even with the explanation you misunderstood the answer, I can imagine a simple "no" (which would be an answer only) would elicit even more derisive responses from you

"If you don't like DNAS, write your own damn system"

So I did
jaromanda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2015, 18:56   #7
neralex
Major Dude
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 576
http://wiki.shoutcast.com/wiki/SHOUT...eriodic_Events

Do you have misunderstood the timeoffset?

Btw:
transcoder != Shoutcast
transcoder = not more supported

I know exactly from what i speak if a DJ can't hold his volume level. If a DJ has a difference from track to track inside a dj-set from more than 1,5 db and he can't see it when his volume is over the top, then this DJ is far away from a PRO. A good DJ would see the difference on the levelmeter on his djmixer and can adjust it while the prelistening. If not, then the DJ should do his homework.
neralex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Winamp & Shoutcast Forums > Shoutcast > Shoutcast Technical Support

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump