Old 19th October 2003, 21:01   #1
CamD
Junior Member
 
CamD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 17
i say winamp3 should have already been 2.x with better plug-ins, full compatibility, etc. alot less confusing. then we would continue on with 4, 5, etc. in the future.

maybe the next release of 3 could have been dramitically changed to be this, but then they released winamp 5

and if winamp3 is a diferent product name then shouldn't it be winamp + winamp3 = winamp/3, winamp(3), or something? (or just make winamp3 2.x with cool plug-ins and free-form skins, etc.)
CamD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Winamp & Shoutcast Forums > Community Center > General Discussions

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump