|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 17
|
i say winamp3 should have already been 2.x with better plug-ins, full compatibility, etc. alot less confusing
. then we would continue on with 4, 5, etc. in the future.maybe the next release of 3 could have been dramitically changed to be this, but then they released winamp 5 ![]() and if winamp3 is a diferent product name then shouldn't it be winamp + winamp3 = winamp/3, winamp(3), or something? (or just make winamp3 2.x with cool plug-ins and free-form skins, etc.) |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|