|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
|
love vs. lust
a few years ago, i had a big big crush on this girl i worked with. was it love? i think so, but most ppl tell me it was naive infatuation.
anyway, heres some more general questions: 1)does love exist? 2)how can u differentiate between love and lust/infatuation? 3)if love exists, then is it fair, ie, is it equally available to every person - good or bad, rich or poor, pretty or ugly? 4)if love exists, then does it last forever, or is it temporary like every other thing in the world? 5)is love connected in any way to lust/sex? 6)is it possible to love more than one person? 7)does everyone experience love in the same way, or is it universal? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Nothing to say...
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 23,098
|
If you find yourself thinking about someone all the time and getting a boner each time you think of them, then that's probably lust
If you find yourself thinking about someone all the time and you only occasionaly get a boner, then you probably have some deeper feelings for them. Simple really, well if your a bloke, the female of the species probably have their own unique take on things. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From:
Posts: 233
|
There was once this girl in school. I knew here casually, and she was a nice girl; sweet smart good looking et all.
All of a sudden, during the holidays I couldn't stop thinking about her. Not just sexually, though that came into it too. I mean it was crazy. I went to sleep and dreamed about her. And I had no way of contacting her, she was on holiday somewhere. Anyway, it stopped as randomly as it began, about a week later. At the time I was convinced I was in love, but now I'm pretty sure it was just infatuation. The difference being, that love wouldn't have stopped. Shit, I cant believe I just said that. I've never told anybody, incase they though I was imbalanced or something. If anybody laughs, I’ll never come back to these forums again.
-there is no signature- |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Junior Member
|
i dont believe in love as some magical, everlasting ideal. is it still possible to love someone if they dont love me back? if the answer is yes, then love can be very cruel and painful. if the answer is no, then ... damn, my love life has sucked!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
|
my opinion is that yes, love does exist. it's not always fair, it usually does last forever... in some form... cause even if you do love someone for a while and get devorced or break up, you either still usually have some feelings for them, or the love turns to hate... which is an equally strong emotion in my opinion. i think you can truely love more than one person. lust is, in my opinion, just a sexual thing and love is more of an emotional/spiritual type of caring.
Well, that's my take on it. Dunno how much that enlightens you, but I tried. haha
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Rudolf the Red.
(Forum King) Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 9,314
|
Love is a human feeling, like happiness or fear. I would say in general lust is more sexual and love is a connection at a deeper level, a really good friendship with some sex to boost.
Love isn't fair or equal, it's specific to an individual, maybe they'll find it, maybe they wont, maybe it'll last forever, maybe it wont. I think it's possible to love someone and to fall out of love with them, it's also possible to lovesome until you die. I think it's difficult to love more than one person at a time, although not impossible and I feel sorry for people who get into that situation, it must be incredibly difficult to make anything good out of it. As love is a feeling it's not possible to determine whether everyone experiances it the same way. I hate it when someone says "prove you love me", sorry, I can't it's not possible. Just like you can't PROVE to me you're happy/sad etc. "We think science is interesting and if you disagree, you can fuck off." |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Hobbit Humper
Forum King Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: banned camp
Posts: 4,127
|
Re: love vs. lust
Quote:
2. Refer to what Mr. Jones said. It is possible to experience both for the same thing though. 3. I believe all persons are capable of experiencing some form of hormonal imbalance for one object of the other. The level of imbalance will be dependent on the person. 4. If you formulate your definition of love adaquately the response to this question will be obvious. One's perception alters with time and so does the nature of one's love. At one time long ago I could REALLY say I loved money by my definition of love. (Not that I don't now... ) 5. Refer to #2 6. There are different levels of love that one can experience, whether it be for kin, comarade, possesions or mate. 7. Different people should react differently to their feelings. Consider: a psychopath might try to preserve the "purity" of his love and kill the object of their affection, a stalker would stalk (duh!), and so on. Refer to #3. Love hurts. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From:
Posts: 233
|
Quote:
Goodbye cruel world.
-there is no signature- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Little Winged One
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canada, now UK
Posts: 4,174
|
Re: love vs. lust
1)does love exist?
Yes, very much so. 2)how can u differentiate between love and lust/infatuation? You'll know... It sounds shitty Matrix 3 dialogue I know, but you'll know inside. 3)if love exists, then is it fair, ie, is it equally available to every person - good or bad, rich or poor, pretty or ugly? It is available to everyone, but as is life, it's not always fair. 4)if love exists, then does it last forever, or is it temporary like every other thing in the world? It's how much you put into it and how much you want to make it last. It's a mutual thing. 5)is love connected in any way to lust/sex? Yes. 6)is it possible to love more than one person? Yes, I believe so, but I happen to be monogamous. 7)does everyone experience love in the same way, or is it universal? That's one of the great mysteries, my friend. just as feathery as ever | portfolio | a poignant quote |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Major Dudette
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Somewhere no one can find me...in my own head.
Posts: 978
|
1)does love exist? Yes. On many different levels, love does exist.
2)how can u differentiate between love and lust/infatuation? Mr. Jones was pretty much right about this one. Let me also add that love is about acceptance. Love should not require that you are joined at the hip with whoever you profess to love. 3)if love exists, then is it fair, ie, is it equally available to every person - good or bad, rich or poor, pretty or ugly? It can be, yes. I mean, look at some of the horrible people in prison (Richard Ramirez, Danny Rollins) who have met, fell in love with, and married women outside of prison. My upstairs neighbors recently married. He's not that bad looking, but his wife is certainly no prize. Hell, even I married a dog-faced boy. Then again, I really didn't love him, so that doesn't count. 4)if love exists, then does it last forever, or is it temporary like every other thing in the world? It depends on the level and type of love. Love exists on many different levels. 5)is love connected in any way to lust/sex? I think it's possible to love someone and lust after them at times. But still, sex is just sex. You can go out and screw anyone you like without having to love them. Love is something much deeper and more potent than lust. 6)is it possible to love more than one person? Of course it is! 7)does everyone experience love in the same way, or is it universal? I'm not sure that any two people experience love in exactly the same way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: the DUB C
Posts: 84
|
i have the same problem too thinking about love and lust..my gosh look at my sig. well i just think that love is real but it is hard to give and recieve. lust is just there for your pleasure, emotionally or physically. but love does exist and it is the hardest thing to contain and keep when you do have it...so hard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Major Dude
|
there are some words like "keyboard" that are straightforward. No one will argue with me that what i'm using to type right now is a keyboard (unless they're a stupid noob in which case STFU n00b).
"Love" on the other hand has a very squishy meaning. To make love is a differnt love than "I love you mom". well at least i hope so .... "i love chocolate!" is different that "I will love you for the rest of my life"Part of this problem is the fact that english condenses the word love so much. Greeks had three words for love. Ancient persia had like 80, and we have one. ![]() Anyways, you can spend your life wondering what love is and trying to define it, or you can just live knowing (or at least hoping) it exists and being happy that you have a general clue as to what it is. I think the second one is much easier. Good luck. No sig here folks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Doctor
(Senior Member) |
I feel it in my fingers, I feel it in my toes; love is all around me...
Love does exists, but sometimes in a relationship it is hard to say wheter it is still true love or just lust. I say "just lust" because I don't like it that way. Love generally is a difficult thing indeed, now it is somehow explained as mental addiction to certain hormones produced by hypothalamus when it is stimulated the proper way. But what is the right way (person) and how to find it - don't ask me, I am a lucky bastard bacuase it works for me . How do they call the Big Mac? Big Mac's a Big Mac, but they call it Le Big Mac! LE BIG MAC?! Vincent & Jules in Pulp Fiction |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||||||||
|
has a crush on Bilbo
(Forum Queen) Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Switzerland Posts: The starting points at a racetrack.
Posts: 3,060
|
Re: love vs. lust
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Mia
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Junior Member
|
i purposely didn't define love, cos i knew that i wouldn't be able to. i didnt wanna say love as a feeling, or as a moral ideal or anything, cos i wanted to leave that open for suggestion. but, i was referring to love in the romantic sense, not love for a chocolate or love for your mum, even though some might say they're the same thing...
i like this, to me it makes sense: Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
not fucked, not quite.
(Forum King) |
It depends on who you ask, really. Everyone has a different opinion on love, so nobody who has posted here is exactly right about it.
Make it what you want. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Major Dude
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,778
|
I'm going to argue that love doesn't exist simply because it isn't in a tangible form. At best love exists as an emotion, theres a possiblity that love exists as a "socal construt" or "fabrication of socity", and at worset it simply doesn't exist at all.
To me, love is a bond between people. It is a state of mutual respect, trust, views (to a certain extent), and any other indiscribeable things that make you happy you know and have something to do with this person. This goes for all types of love, friends, family, objects (can't be very mutual, but hey,), "lovers" for lack of a better term, etc. ¯¯¯¯Joe Bloggs____ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|