Old 7th March 2004, 01:28   #1
Peter Tate
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 37
Guys I'm of the school of thought that when using low bitrates you don't try and do a half arsed job of encoding the tops. So for me when encoding for 56K modem people I think AM radio specs for all compression settings etc.

Whilst mp3pro does work nicely for people on modems. I find that when listening to a pro enabled stream on a default Winamp it is a bit more shimmy than the normal mp3. Also when you do install the plugin you get your top end back BUT it sounds like a reconstructed replica of it. Funny that's what it is!!! You can take milk turn it into powdered stuff then add the water later to get milk agian but it tastes like POWDERED MILK!

So for me mp3pro is not the go! If bandwidth is the the issue that makes it work for you then, concider this--

mp pro is concdered to be of benefit for streams below 64K with no real benefit to those up higher. For me it makes sense to run a 64K mono stream sampled 44khz. This would be better as it is full quality at that bitrate.

Hey everyone accepts 128k 44khz stereo as FM quality! Well let's keep that as the benchmark so 64k mono on a normal stream sounding shmick is the go!
Peter Tate is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Winamp & Shoutcast Forums > Shoutcast > Shoutcast Technical Support

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump