Would you stay or would you go.......

missyob · 27th April 2005, 12:43

Which would you pick for yourself........

A relationship where the sex was fantastic and frequent but the rest sucked.

OR

A relationship where you felt loved and needed. Everything was fantastic but the sex was horrible?

~ Missy

Wolfgang · 27th April 2005, 13:10

That's tough. I think I'd need the sex. But it would suck on its own. So far I've only really had the top one, and I'm sure the sex would have been great had we stayed together till we were a bit older. Damn.

Too-DAMN-Much · 27th April 2005, 14:41

i couldn't choose, i need sex and snugglin

Leonhart · 27th April 2005, 14:56

Difficult one, truly though i believe not every relationship should be sex driven, so i would pick the one where you feel loved & needed, plus you could always try improving on the sex.

MStar · 27th April 2005, 15:03

Take the 2nd one and find your sex elsewhere.

k_rock923 · 27th April 2005, 15:19

The second one without a doubt.

zootm · 27th April 2005, 15:38

Hmm. I posted here but it's disappeared.

Edit: Never mind, forgot to click the button (you try functioning after an exam at 9:30 about "Embedded Systems").

From experience (of both), the second is better.

psyfive · 27th April 2005, 16:05

I think I would rather have the second one.

hgnis · 27th April 2005, 16:40

Marslow.
I would go for neither option. Fill all my requirements to a reasonable extent or fill none.
Logic: I have evolved past my baser instincts and also any needs for being loved etc. However, for children to be nutured properly adults need to set the example and hence both are needed in the long term.

LuigiHann · 27th April 2005, 16:49

Quote:

Originally posted by hgnis
[B]Logic: I have evolved past my baser instincts and also any needs for being loved etc.B]

You some kinda robot?

NJK · 27th April 2005, 16:57

Quote:

Originally posted by missyob

A relationship where the sex was fantastic and frequent but the rest sucked.

are you talking about my previous marriage Missy???

LuigiHann · 27th April 2005, 17:06

I would preferably go with the second one, although if I were in a relationship of the first type I'd probably be happy enough to stick with it unless it was tearing me apart.

Print · 27th April 2005, 17:28

Option 2.

Like someone said, you could always work on the sex.

You can't say the same for two people who don't get along.

Warrior of the Light · 27th April 2005, 17:38

#2: sex can be taught.

If not to her, then still #2;
Spending 24/7 in bed (or other places) would eventually become boring too

missyob · 27th April 2005, 17:57

Quote:

Originally posted by spaceplay
are you talking about my previous marriage Missy???

LOL Pretty Funny

~ Missy

bkraptor · 27th April 2005, 18:25

How can S E X be bad? I mean... I just can't imagine how it could be bad.

and to answer the question, I'd choose pick #2.

Print · 27th April 2005, 18:39

Quote:

Originally posted by bkraptor
How can S E X be bad?

T R U S T M E - I T C A N B E.

NJK · 27th April 2005, 18:43

Quote:

Originally posted by blueprint_n9ne
T R U S T M E - I T C A N B E.

couldn't have said it better.

had a short affair with a woman who had been abused by her ex BF , sex was a disaster (when it finally came to having sex, the first few months looked more like therapy sessions in bed)

drewbar · 27th April 2005, 18:47

After being single as long as I was, bad sex is better then no sex at all. Plus, sex usualy can be improved, if both parties are open minded. I used to laugh at the sex how-to books, but they provide some very useful and fun information. (As long as you avoid the British ones, leave it to British acidemics to make sex boring).

Coman · 27th April 2005, 19:25

both are essential.

however you can always masturbate but you can't get the loving you need by yourself.

[edit] you cannot improve on sex the way the situation is given, it's one or the other, read the question right. and if you could then you could also work on the relationship.

deeder7001 · 27th April 2005, 19:56

i'd go with option 2 because a relationship shouldn't be centered around just sex.

Warrior of the Light · 27th April 2005, 20:59

Quote:

Originally posted by bkraptor
How can S E X be bad? I mean... I just can't imagine how it could be bad.

1 Word: T E E T H

hgnis · 27th April 2005, 21:25

Quote:

Originally posted by LuigiHann
You some kinda robot?

My demeanour mirrors my avatar.

Mike H. · 27th April 2005, 22:37

#2, definitely.

Bilbo Baggins · 27th April 2005, 22:42

As long as I get mine away, who cares what the rest is like. You can always ignore someone.

White Raven · 28th April 2005, 00:51

How can sex be horrible?
And if the relationship is so great - you guys should be able to talk it out together, know what works best for the both of you. None of this pussyfooting around (Excuse that pun, dear lord that was not intended) but if the relationship is good, must mean the communication is good.

missyob · 28th April 2005, 03:48

Quote:

Originally posted by Alida
How can sex be horrible?

Trust me babe, sex can be really yucky.

And size does not matter much unless it is under 3 1/2 inches. It is what he does with it that counts.

When you find the guy that can make you orgazm in less than a minute keep him........

drewbar · 28th April 2005, 05:16

Quote:

Originally posted by WarriorO/TLight
1 Word: T E E T H

Depends. You can do some good things with teeth if you do it gently and in the right places.

Jay · 28th April 2005, 05:34

Quote:

Originally posted by missyob
...size does not matter much unless it is under 3 1/2 inches. ...

well I am screwed. later guys.

SSJ4 Gogitta · 28th April 2005, 05:37

Quote:

Originally posted by KXRM
well I am screwed. later guys.

Well, that's a double pun if I ever saw one...

On the other hand, I'm NOT screwed...

xzxzzx · 29th April 2005, 14:15

Quote:

Originally posted by SSJ4 Gogitta
Well, that's a double pun if I ever saw one...

Probably you meant "double entendre", like "If I said you had a beautiful body, would you hold it against me?". ^_^

I'd go for #2. Sex can be improved. Human relationships, if that bad, generally can't get much better.

Plus, if you're not getting out of a relationship where everything but the sex "sucked", (presuming you don't have some external cohesive force like children), each of you would probably be (intentionally or not) playing off a "weakness" in the other (otherwise one of you would break it off, right?) Co-dependency is a good example.

27th April 2005, 12:43	#1
missyob Angel of Winamp Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: The Winamp House Posts: 4,578	Would you stay or would you go....... Which would you pick for yourself........ A relationship where the sex was fantastic and frequent but the rest sucked. OR A relationship where you felt loved and needed. Everything was fantastic but the sex was horrible? ~ Missy

27th April 2005, 14:41	#3
Too-DAMN-Much The Big Bad Boots (Forum King) Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: 420 Big Buds Way Posts: 3,964	i couldn't choose, i need sex and snugglin I hate everyone, so you don't have to.

27th April 2005, 14:56	#4
Leonhart Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: England Posts: 312	Difficult one, truly though i believe not every relationship should be sex driven, so i would pick the one where you feel loved & needed, plus you could always try improving on the sex. "To Be Forgotten Is Worse Than Death"

27th April 2005, 15:19	#6
k_rock923 \m/ (Forum King) Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: /bin/bash Posts: 7,850	The second one without a doubt. Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway.

27th April 2005, 16:40	#9
hgnis Hobbit Humper Forum King Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: banned camp Posts: 4,127	Marslow. I would go for neither option. Fill all my requirements to a reasonable extent or fill none. Logic: I have evolved past my baser instincts and also any needs for being loved etc. However, for children to be nutured properly adults need to set the example and hence both are needed in the long term. I am so important I feel the need to let it be known like a liberal discovering the internets for the first time. Uh hur hur hur. I also wash myself with a rag on a stick. Reality bites <3

27th April 2005, 13:10	#2
Wolfgang Forum King Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 3,069	That's tough. I think I'd need the sex. But it would suck on its own. So far I've only really had the top one, and I'm sure the sex would have been great had we stayed together till we were a bit older. Damn.

27th April 2005, 15:03	#5
MStar Major Dude Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Hardcore Heaven Posts: 1,491	Take the 2nd one and find your sex elsewhere.

27th April 2005, 15:38	#7
zootm Forum King Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: the nether reaches of bonnie scotland Posts: 13,375	Hmm. I posted here but it's disappeared. Edit: Never mind, forgot to click the button (you try functioning after an exam at 9:30 about "Embedded Systems"). From experience (of both), the second is better.

27th April 2005, 16:05	#8
psyfive Forum King Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Colorado Posts: 2,527	I think I would rather have the second one.

27th April 2005, 17:06	#12
LuigiHann Forum King Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: 80's Japan Posts: 3,449	I would preferably go with the second one, although if I were in a relationship of the first type I'd probably be happy enough to stick with it unless it was tearing me apart. Who is the milkman? What is the purpose of the goggles?

27th April 2005, 17:28	#13
Print Forum King Join Date: May 2002 Location: Canada Posts: 3,215	Option 2. Like someone said, you could always work on the sex. You can't say the same for two people who don't get along.

27th April 2005, 17:38	#14
Warrior of the Light Forum King Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 4,121	#2: sex can be taught. If not to her, then still #2; Spending 24/7 in bed (or other places) would eventually become boring too Jesus loves you [yes, you] so much, he even died for you so that you will not need to die, but live forever

27th April 2005, 18:25	#16
bkraptor Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Land of the miracle Posts: 50	How can S E X be bad? I mean... I just can't imagine how it could be bad. and to answer the question, I'd choose pick #2.

27th April 2005, 18:47	#19
drewbar Sawg 2.0 Major Dude Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 5,916	After being single as long as I was, bad sex is better then no sex at all. Plus, sex usualy can be improved, if both parties are open minded. I used to laugh at the sex how-to books, but they provide some very useful and fun information. (As long as you avoid the British ones, leave it to British acidemics to make sex boring). Count with us! Jan 1st, 12AM (PST, GMT -8) 2010 - 282,246

27th April 2005, 19:25	#20
Coman Punk (Forum King) Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: 4.5th dimension . . Posts: infinitely few Posts: 2,799	both are essential. however you can always masturbate but you can't get the loving you need by yourself. [edit] you cannot improve on sex the way the situation is given, it's one or the other, read the question right. and if you could then you could also work on the relationship. "Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?"

27th April 2005, 19:56	#21
deeder7001 Jesus Freak (Forum King) Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Tempe, AZ Posts: 5,560	i'd go with option 2 because a relationship shouldn't be centered around just sex. There is no sig.

27th April 2005, 22:37	#24
Mike H. Forum Esperantist (Major Dude) Join Date: Nov 2000 Posts: 1,135	#2, definitely.

27th April 2005, 22:42	#25
Bilbo Baggins Wind Chime of the Apocalypse Join Date: May 2000 Location: The Forest Posts: 17,228	As long as I get mine away, who cares what the rest is like. You can always ignore someone.

28th April 2005, 00:51	#26
White Raven Little Winged One Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Canada, now UK Posts: 4,174	How can sex be horrible? And if the relationship is so great - you guys should be able to talk it out together, know what works best for the both of you. None of this pussyfooting around (Excuse that pun, dear lord that was not intended) but if the relationship is good, must mean the communication is good. just as feathery as ever \| portfolio \| a poignant quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode