Old 2nd April 2017, 11:16   #1
djSpinnerCee
Forum King
 
djSpinnerCee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hollis, Queens/The Bronx, NYC
Posts: 3,555
it's not practical or efficient to use ssl for any stream - streaming audio/video already has enough overhead in the encode decode process, you don't need the additional cpu load on both ends for a media stream.

a stream contains no information that needs to be protected by ssl encryption, and neither side needs to certify their authenticity -- a stream is public, free for all, anonymously.
djSpinnerCee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2017, 17:12   #2
djcenk
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by djSpinnerCee View Post
it's not practical or efficient to use ssl for any stream - streaming audio/video already has enough overhead in the encode decode process, you don't need the additional cpu load on both ends for a media stream.

a stream contains no information that needs to be protected by ssl encryption, and neither side needs to certify their authenticity -- a stream is public, free for all, anonymously.
Hi djSpinnerCee thank you for your reply.
Yes, you right, i know ssl is not require for streaming but our customer radio web page has use ssl certificate, and their player was not play without ssl streams.
regards.
djcenk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Winamp & Shoutcast Forums > Shoutcast > Shoutcast Discussions

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump