|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1
|
Winamp Site Improvments
I think you guys should as some flash or shock to the page and a little of activex to make it more interactive and fancier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
|
yeah i guess that would be nice...
1000th post!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Comfortably Numb
(Forum King) Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,619
|
Congradulations Scarface2k1!!!
Quote:
that there allot of people with 56k dial-up access here. Theyr'e already slowed down by sigs and avatars that are animated and by allot of large .jpg and .gif images that ocassionally make their way here. Adding flash files and activex would further slow down their times, /me thinks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Pretty Cool Guy
|
Flash has become really overused for certain things.
I've gone so far as to not install flash in K-Meleon since all flash really does is bloat... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Stereotype?
(Forum King) Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ware, England
Posts: 3,511
|
What purpose would flash or shockwave really serve here?
None. It would just add bloat to an already slow site. I'm on dialup (which hardly ever reaches 56k ) and if loads of bloody moving graphics were added to try and make it look fancy then I wouldn't come back.Either that or we should have an alt.fan.winamp newsgroup or something like that to use instead... |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
![]() heh heh heh guess i have to work on another thou
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
(Forum King) Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Manchester
Posts: 4,209
|
Flash is a nightmare on 56K - especially when the site you're trying to view tells you to download the latest version, only to use it for a crummy intro. I don't think I could use
www.rockstargames.com/grandtheftauto3 on 56K and retain my sanity, as the site is composed entirely using shockwave. Thank goodness for my (current) faster connection
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Court Jester
(Forum King) |
On the website I administer, when people ask for "improvements" by the brand name of the technology rather than the nature of the content, I usually go to their house and spray paint a huge-ass STFU!!! at their porch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
|
Another point to consider
I'm not sure why no one has brought this up. But macromedia is a bitch that requires proprietary plugins. Not only does that slow load time but the proper plugins aren't even available for certain platforms and browsers. That would kill cross-compatability pretty quickly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 125
|
one of the best improments would be to get rid of those stupid news articles and retarded posts come on nullsoft get serious and just tell us about winamps progress and improvments instead of what stupid thigs you think up in your heads
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 11,361
|
Quote:
now that I think about it, it would be kinda nice to be able to browse the forums without opening up a web browser. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum King
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Internet Posts: 3 Trillion
Posts: 4,241
|
I like those news stories. They're fun to read. Anyhow, the Winamp Site is good as it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Wind Chime of the Apocalypse
Join Date: May 2000
Location: The Forest
Posts: 17,228
|
A forum like this is far easier to administer than a Newsgroup, and you have far more customisability too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Stereotype?
(Forum King) Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ware, England
Posts: 3,511
|
I understand that it's far more customizable and there is actually some way of administering the posts and everything.
It's just I prefer newsgroups - much quicker to navigate; just have agent download all the messages, and then peruse them at leisure. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum King
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hawarden
Posts: 2,115
|
And don't forget the pr0n!
Sorry - am I being too cynical?
There's no need to tell me when I'm right; I operate on that principle exclusively and with absolute certainty |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Stereotype?
(Forum King) Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ware, England
Posts: 3,511
|
Quote:
Not that I've tried. erm.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|