Old 11th February 2003, 18:46   #1
Atmo
The Freak
(Forum King)
 
Atmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 9,400
AMD ownz again...XP3000+ with 128kb L1 & 512kb L2 cache

http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/...~66645,00.html

Quote:
AMD today introduced the AMD Athlon™ XP processor 3000+ — the world’s highest performing desktop PC processor. Featuring increased cache memory for greater performance, the AMD Athlon XP processor 3000+ outperforms competing desktop PC processors by up to 17 percent on a variety of industry standard software benchmarks.
w00t. Not only will AMD fans be able to get something that can beat the P4 3.06, but intel will now be forced to drop their prices, and bring out something new to take the lead again.
Atmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2003, 20:47   #2
fwgx
Rudolf the Red.
(Forum King)
 
fwgx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 9,314
The funny thing is that the clock speed is actually SLOWER than the 2800+s!

"We think science is interesting and if you disagree, you can fuck off."
fwgx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2003, 04:06   #3
InvisableMan
Ninja Master!
(Forum King)
 
InvisableMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hotel California
Posts: 4,333
amd p00ns j00
InvisableMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2003, 08:00   #4
Atmo
The Freak
(Forum King)
 
Atmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 9,400
Just finished reading a whole pile of reviews, and it seems in most real world aplications it does come close and in most cases beats the P4 3.06.

I'll wait and see what intel comes up with now, since im planning one more upgrade before the 64 bit processors become mainstream, but the bartons look good at the moment.
Atmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2003, 12:47   #5
binary hero
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,004
Send a message via ICQ to binary hero
oooh, sexy. they will fit socket a mobos...right? they aren't trying to be crafty and get me to buy a new mobo?
binary hero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2003, 13:26   #6
Atmo
The Freak
(Forum King)
 
Atmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 9,400
The bartons will work in any socket A motherboard. But some may need the bios flashed to recognise it properly.

The only real problem is the fsb speed, unless your mobo and ram can handle a 166 fsb it'll run 1/5th slower than it should, so it'd only give around the same performance as a much cheaper 2400+.
Atmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2003, 17:14   #7
apollos
Forum King
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canterbury & Plymouth
Posts: 4,176
question, will this new card fit into my socket A epox mobo?
apollos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2003, 02:56   #8
xzxzzx
Forum King
 
xzxzzx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,254
Re: AMD ownz again...XP3000+ with 128kb L1 & 512kb L2 cache

Quote:
Originally posted by Atmo
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/...~66645,00.html



w00t. Not only will AMD fans be able to get something that can beat the P4 3.06, but intel will now be forced to drop their prices, and bring out something new to take the lead again.
/me SOOOO wants.... ughghghhghg.

On another note, YAY!!! AMD is back on top again. Hopefully, the 64-bit series will give them a longer strech on top!

Freedom of speech is the basic freedom of humanity. When you've lost that, you've lost everything.
1\/\/4y 34|<$p4y 1gp4y 33714y, 0d4y 0uy4y? | Roses are #FF0000; Violets are #0000FF; chown -R ${YOU} ~/base
The DMCA. It really is that bad. : Count for your life.
xzxzzx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2003, 15:20   #9
pktaewon
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1
Send a message via AIM to pktaewon
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030210/index.html


barton isn't as expected to perform as well as AMD expected..Prices..are a tsk tsk..man..Athlon is done with after 5 some years...just bring out Hammer. Intel is tearing it up with P4.as of now as AMD had earlier did with 1st/2nd Gen Athlons vs P3s
pktaewon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2003, 18:45   #10
fwgx
Rudolf the Red.
(Forum King)
 
fwgx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 9,314
I read the TH review and the P4 kicked the shit out of it on almost all accounts. Gimmie the 8 core chip Sun are working on! And quickly!!!!!

"We think science is interesting and if you disagree, you can fuck off."
fwgx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2003, 09:46   #11
Bizznatch
Forum King
 
Bizznatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 4,180
Send a message via AIM to Bizznatch
they also released the 2500+, with the Barton core running # 1.833ghz and has a 512k cache and runs on the 333mhz bus, and at only $180 its a steal, my next CPU will be that
Bizznatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2003, 10:36   #12
Rocker
Hiding in plain sight (mod)
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,910
cheapass:

can someone thow me an old pentium3 >500mhz with a slotket.
Rocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2003, 16:27   #13
liquidmotion
Smokes Two Joints
Beta Team
 
liquidmotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: SFBA
Posts: 3,680
Send a message via ICQ to liquidmotion
what about the apple g4 processor? i thought the opteron was l33t with 64bit, but g4 claims 128?

whassup with that?

For a good time: shup | stashbox | my homepage
liquidmotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Winamp & Shoutcast Forums > Community Center > Breaking News

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump