Am I missing something?

[Fickle]

Originally posted by Cognition
It's like that guy in Bowling For Columbine who's going on about how people have to rise up against the government and be armed with weapons to bring them down and stuff, and then he's asked like "what about Ghandi's way? He didn't use weapons and he defeated the British Empire", and he pauses and goes "I'm not familiar with that" and you realise he doesn't really know anything, he's just mindlessly against everything.

Michael Moore had a good idea but ruined it with his political agenda. More than likely, he had to search for someone who didn't know who Ghandi was. You want to talk about blatant negative positions, look at Bowling For Columbine. An awe inspiring example of "adjusting" facts and using editing, selective and suggestive filming to create a political problem that exists only in a few areas.

I can't believe that you even consider that to be a good example of anything but Moore's blatant political agenda.

deeder7001 said...
i noticed that not many people here like Creed. nobody is really saying why.

I dislike Creed because the guys is an admitted egomaniac, I dislike their version of music (rock? pfft.) and The lead singer Ruined, yes ruined several of Jim Morrison's songs on Stoned Emmaculate, a tribute to The Doors with different singers stepping in. The only reason they chose this particular fucknut is because he remotely and while on opium, resembles Morrison simply because he has long brown hair. Creeds singer was the luckiest sack of shit to sing Morrison's lyrics with the original Doors, and he fucked up the songs. That is why I hate Creed (mostly it's singer.)