WINAMP.COM | Forums > Winamp3 > Winamp3 Discussion > Winamp 2.9, Winamp3, and the future |
| Pages (11): [1] 2 3 » ... Last » |
Last Thread
Next Thread
|
| Author |
|
|
steve Intolerant Ex-Administrator
Registered: Apr 2000 |
With as many views as this, why are you people afraid to respond or ask questions? __________________ |
||
|
|
|
cybaix Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2001 |
|
||
|
|
|
-[WonderBlood]- Major Dude
Registered: Jan 2001 |
Does this mean there will be no Winamp3 release in future??? __________________ |
||
|
|
|
steve Intolerant Ex-Administrator
Registered: Apr 2000 |
we've recieved a few reports of this multimon issue. we'll investigate. __________________ |
||
|
|
|
steve Intolerant Ex-Administrator
Registered: Apr 2000 |
wonderblood, winamp 5 is very focused on making sure that the client is as fast and solid as possible. as wasabi matures further, we'll decide to bring in more and more of the feature set into the winamp 5 client... currently, the skin engine is the most mature so that's where we're starting... __________________ |
||
|
|
|
-[WonderBlood]- Major Dude
Registered: Jan 2001 |
okay, thx steve, we'll see __________________ |
||
|
|
|
dj_rigo Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2000 |
i hope that in the future winamp3 will be back in a stable form. go brennan! __________________ |
||
|
|
|
thepyr0x Major Dude
Registered: Oct 2001 |
Um, will the ML in 2.9 actually *WORK*? By that I mean we still (as of 488, I haven't checked this in 498 but it looks like it's there too) can't delete entries all the time; and sometimes we can't even modify them. I'd rather have to wait for Winamp 2.9 to load the song info every time you add it than not have my ML updating itself automatically (like, when you change an ID3 tag but it doesn't change in the PL...) or even manually (when you specifically hit reload info) __________________ |
||
|
|
|
jarsonic Major Dude
Registered: Aug 2000 |
thepyr0x: why don't you try it? It works great. |
||
|
|
|
Paparazzi Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2002 |
|
||
|
|
|
D&B Banned
Registered: Mar 2001 |
Re: Winamp 2.9, Winamp3, and the future
|
||
|
|
|
Japie_17 Junior Member
Registered: Mar 2003 |
Memory Usage
As we all know, Winamp 3 uses a lot more resources than WinAmp 2.xx does. Can you tell me how much more memory Winamp "5" uses, when one wants to use freeform skins? |
||
|
|
|
PJay Tycy Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2002 |
I think this cd-ripping will not be for those who currently use EAC+LAME or similar programs. I think it's gonna be for those who want a cd ripped in less than 10 minutes and don't care that much about the quality. |
||
|
|
|
-[WonderBlood]- Major Dude
Registered: Jan 2001 |
where the hell can I get Winamp 2.9 ??? __________________ |
||
|
|
|
thepyr0x Major Dude
Registered: Oct 2001 |
The ripper will probably be LAME...just because that seems to be the biggest trend. __________________ |
||
|
|
|
cortana Member
Registered: Aug 2002 |
Oh man.... 2.9 is really cool. At least, the ML is really, really, really cool. And the video windows is pretty hot too. I just wish they were in Winamp3... I mean, it dosen't seem to hard to have them in the next release of Winamp3, and while I appreciate 2.9, it just feels a little too musty for me - I want my alt-clicking and sidecar. Oh well. Push, Brennan, push! __________________ Last edited by cortana on 03-22-2003 at 06:25 PM |
||
|
|
|
thepyr0x Major Dude
Registered: Oct 2001 |
Will 2.9 have (cuz as far as I can tell the beta does not) that enqueue (within a playlist) feature I use so very much in 3 __________________ |
||
|
|
|
DJ Egg Moderator
Registered: Jun 2000 |
For those that missed it . . . |
||
|
|
|
GLewellen Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2001 |
How will the maki coding system change in the final release of winamp 5, if at all? __________________ |
||
|
|
|
blinkrebel Junior Member
Registered: Mar 2003 |
i think that you guys (at nullsoft) realized that winamp3 was a mistake. slow, slow, slow, thats how winamp 3 can be defined. i dont know much about wasabi but i think it s*cks. i think you realized it too =) anyway, justin is back (he's the man anyway) and things are getting better... winamp 2.9x will be f*cking good and i think winamp 5 will be as well. |
||
|
|
|
dj_rigo Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2000 |
__________________ |
||
|
|
|
The Master Junior Member
Registered: May 2001 |
Bugs, Feature requests
(NOTE: I am a rock, and opened a new thread instead of hitting reply. Please don't kill me |
||
|
|
|
cybaix Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2001 |
Tack another bug ontop your list.. a very annoying one. I am now getting blue screens of death under win2k on closing out winamp. I'm really fucking pissed off right now and holding back from ranting to much because this POS just caused me to lose some really important downloads. Seriously guys get your act together |
||
|
|
|
Quake110 Junior Member
Registered: May 2001 |
|
||
|
|
|
shins Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003 |
And you're inferring that complete versions won't compromise stability? |
||
|
|
|
graigsmith Member
Registered: Aug 2002 |
ok.. i am trying the winamp 2.9.. and i like it. actually i think i like it better than winamp 3.. it is speedy. and does video. amazing!!! __________________ |
||
|
|
|
CraigF Passionately Apathetic Administrator
Registered: May 2000 |
you can choose in the options to have the library launch from the winamp logo (bottom right main window). |
||
|
|
|
Jacob XP Junior Member
Registered: Mar 2003 |
I have one problem with the Winamp library. Most of times when I scroll through my songs I want to enqueue a song. So I think it would be a good idea that you could enqueue a song with a single keystroke. That would make things a lot easier. |
||
|
|
|
XxDaRkFyRexX Junior Member
Registered: Mar 2003 |
yo i got a question for ya. How about DVD Decoding/Playback? That would be really cool. And I played mpeg's / avi's in WinAMp3 and u know what...it was slow as hell. max 2 fps. I'm hoping you know about this shit and are fixing it but if not, there's your heads up bug report. I'd also think it would be cool to allow .MOV format to be played. Thanx peace out playa |
||
|
|
|
D&B Banned
Registered: Mar 2001 |
.MOV is copyrighted by Apple, and most likely will never be playable in Winamp. |
||
|
|
|
nrmncook Junior Member
Registered: Jan 2002 |
Re: Winamp 2.9, Winamp3, and the future
|
||
|
|
|
Mgz Junior Member
Registered: Nov 2002 |
the only thing make me sad is |
||
|
|
|
iPlayTheSpoons Major Dude
Registered: Aug 2001 |
it was a joke Mgz...a jooooke __________________ |
||
|
|
|
thepyr0x Major Dude
Registered: Oct 2001 |
Any idea when I'll be able to get my hands on the dev kit & examples for doin mp3 player support (I'm planning on doing something for my Samsung YP-700; cuz the software it comes with sucks) __________________ |
||
|
|
|
cybaix Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2001 |
|
||
|
|
|
Sarreq Teryx Junior Member
Registered: Jun 2002 |
Re: Re: Winamp 2.9, Winamp3, and the future
|
||
|
|
|
Sarreq Teryx Junior Member
Registered: Jun 2002 |
and also, I tried saving my WA3 playlist into an M3U, thinking it's the same format as WA2.81, but WA3 seems to save certain characters (like: — • á ä ñ ð ó æ ç etc., all not unicode), which it really shouldn't need to, as unicode, causing WA2.9 not to be able to recognize the filenames stored in it. can that be fixed either way soon (WA2.9b3 or WA3.1 or later)? |
||
|
|
|
Paparazzi Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2002 |
Would be nice if clicking in the ML would just play the song without moving it to the playlist. Personally, cannot think of anything more that can be done to make this beauty better! |
||
|
|
|
Hellyspawny Junior Member
Registered: Mar 2003 |
Am I the only one who doesnt want all these things in its music player? I use winamp for playing my mp3's, not for watching video or whatever. If i want to watch video i'd rather use a program which is dedicated to that. All i really need on a day to day basis is winamp to play mp3's and maintain my playlist (and perhaps use shoutcast), but thats it for me. |
||
|
|
|
| Pages (11): [1] 2 3 » ... Last » |
Last Thread Next Thread
|
WINAMP.COM | Forums > Winamp3 > Winamp3 Discussion > Winamp 2.9, Winamp3, and the future |
Forum Rules:
|