Porn in School!!!

[. - .... .- -. ....]

here...

Teacher supervises mock exam - teacher bored - teacher starts to access internet - he asking porn... - teacher forgets that laptop is hooked up to a projector - teacher realises students are being treated to 8' by 6' lesbian porn when girly student runs screaming from the classroom....

[s1138]

lmao!

why cant i ever have teachers like that.

[Xerxes]

Jeez.. and the Wife working in the same math department...

[dam]

That sounds funny.Any idea how old the kids are?

[fwgx]

Worth the 16.5 grand in itself

[. - .... .- -. ....]

Originally posted by dam
That sounds funny.Any idea how old the kids are?

It was in a mock AS exam, so they will have been 16/17...

[Vie]

interesting, you got more fun teachers than me

[pAk]

I was just on my way to post this after reading it in the sun, damn you beat me too it

[Merlin]

Ha ha. This is going to be spread around the net faster than you can say wankinginanexam.com

[eleet-2k2]

Lol! Damn I heard about that one too. Too bad it wasnt immediately noticed.

[Bilbo Baggins]

My mate Moonrad did something like this.

Last term(!) he was found out to have a user profile of about 1GB in size. Now the school though this a little strange, so they went into it. He had the following items LEFT in:

*Debbie Does New Orleans (full length film)
*Doggie does Debbie (yes, it is what you think)

The rest was made up of MP3s.

Teacher was not a happy bunny, but it was funny when she played the porn film in the lesson...

[Merlin]

This kid watches bestiality porn ; is he still your mate (especially after the pp incident)?

[Bilbo Baggins]

Oh yeah. He also watches:

Gay porn
granny porn
shit eating
masocism (like REAL pain)
kiddie porn

He is one twisted fuckup.

[QHOBBES]

yeah this sort of thing happens, a teacher in Mesa (figures)
"accidently" left a porn tape in his VCR and showed some of to his
students when he meant to show Great Expectations (isn't that movie
about incest or something?)
http://www.azfamily.com/news/local/K....7451f502.html

[Curi0us_George]

Originally posted by Bilbo Baggins
Oh yeah. He also watches:

. . .
kiddie porn
. . .

Hmm. I'd probably report that to the police. I'm afraid I wouldn't really care about losing the friend.

[fwgx]

Originally posted by Bilbo Baggins
Oh yeah. He also watches:

Gay porn
granny porn
shit eating
masocism (like REAL pain)
kiddie porn

He is one twisted fuckup.

There's people who like porn and then there's fucked up weirdos who need arresting. I agree with Curi0us.

[Bilbo Baggins]

I wouldn't report him, as his favourite site went down a few months ago (SHIT I DIDN'T KNOW IT WORKED!!!). I dunno if he actually surfed there a lot, but we caught in on it once, and he has never been able to live it down.

[Hunter]

caught red handed

apparently he wasn't teaching a health class

[binary hero]

Hmm. I'd probably report that to the police. I'm afraid I wouldn't really care about losing the friend.

yeah. i agree. that's just wrong.

[. - .... .- -. ....]

You could also put his address and phone number in a number of select "male magazines" advertising him as a rent boy.

Hey, you might even turn a profit if you play your cards right....

[Obedo]

Does this friend Have a girlfriend?(other than his hand)


I dont consider anyone over 15 a "kiddy" if they can have kids we should be able to see them naked

[. - .... .- -. ....]

Originally posted by Obedo
Does this friend Have a girlfriend?(other than his hand)


I dont consider anyone over 15 a "kiddy" if they can have kids we should be able to see them naked

Er.... I don't think the law would agree with you on that one...


12 year old girls can have children too. Does that mean that photographing them naked is acceptable in your eyes?? As far as I know, the legal age to be the subject is 18, so you have another three year wait.

all I can say is that I seriously hope that you don't have a little sister. You seriously need help.

[Hunter]

the legal age to be the subject is 18

Yup


12??? That is just wrong wrong wrong!

[Bilbo Baggins]

yeah, he does have a girlfriend. she just joins in the piss taking when he gets caught.

We have done the advertising thing as well. I can't remember if it was him or not, but we put someones phone number up in the mens toilets at various places. We even arranged a date for one poor sod.

[rm']

Originally posted by Bilbo Baggins

Bilbo, you really shouldn't have linked that...

As for nonconformal sexuality, it's interesting to note why people find things such as kiddie porn and bestiality objectionable, whereas homosexuality is not.

/me tosses grenade into room, then slams the door shut.

[. - .... .- -. ....]

Originally posted by rm'

....kiddie porn and bestiality objectionable, whereas homosexuality is not.

Probably because sex between consenting adults (regardless of gender, and as defined by law, over 16), is well, consentual. They are not affecting the lives of others in what they do.

Child pornography, on the other hand, subjects a person who is unable to give consent, and unable to fight off anyone that uses threats of violence or rape as an incentive, to a degrading, humiliating and psychologically damaging experience, all in the intrests of profit. It is exploitation of the worst form, and anybody that searches for such sites is actively promoting that exploitation.

That, in my eyes, is a big difference, and I have no respect for anyone that is unable to distinguish between the two.

[rm']

Originally posted by ethan_h
Child pornography, on the other hand, subjects a person who is unable to give consent, and unable to fight off anyone that uses threats of violence or rape as an incentive, to a degrading, humiliating and psychologically damaging experience

I'm of the opinion that a teenager can decide for themselves what they want. Whether that decision is a right one, frankly, is irrelevant. As for sex being humiliating and psychologically damaging? If it is consensual, it by no means has to be. This issue raises the question of when is somebody old enough to give consent?

ps. I am, of course, NOT advocating the exploitation of children. But, I think, we should really consider what and why we find certain things immoral. Condemning something is easy, but being consistent isn't.

[Magic_Midget]

Even though I have no opinions at the moment in this conversation, I did find the first post pretty damn funny. Bilbo, as a moderator, shouldn't post porn links...kiddish or not on the forums (I didn't click on it since I'm at the library).

At some point in time I believe that child pornography should be abolished at all means in the USA. But it's near impossible to get rid of it especially in the sex/slave industry in the Far East. Ever go on Kazaa and type in porn and it brings up about 100 files of porno, but most of it is child porn or some shit like that. Child porn gets distributed through peer to peer sites all day. Think about the people that download them....they must be some sick shitheads. And I agree with RM's statement that it is degrading humanity and could also hurt the adult entertainment industry if it ever gets into the mainstream...

[. - .... .- -. ....]

A person of any age can decide what they want. A one year old child can point to a toy that they want, and throw a temper tantrum when his wish isn't granted. Similarly, a ten year old can decide that they have the ability to drive. But do we, as parents or supervisors, let them? No we don't, because we are aware of what might happen if we do.

The question here is if a child or teenager has the ability to make a decision while aware of the consequences of their actions? There is a huge difference between wanting something, and wanting something knowing that you have to live wit the consequences of those actions. And you can't convince me that a child can realise fully the consequences of having sex or being photographed - they simply don't have the life experience to do so.

And this is all on the assumption that all this is consentual. There are many children out there that are forced into these situations due to threats of violence either to them, or to their families. You can't seriously believe that a 6 year old girl can consent to posing in lewd photographs with an adult five or six times her age??

I don't find sex immoral, nor pornography. However, I do find immoral the exploitation of a person of any age or walk of life, but especially the exploitation of a child that has no means to defend themselves.

[Curi0us_George]

Originally posted by Obedo
I dont consider anyone over 15 a "kiddy" if they can have kids we should be able to see them naked

No. You have no right to see someone naked just because they can give birth. You don't have the right to see the average woman on the street naked, no matter what her age.

We have legal ages for these things because it's agreed that we must draw the line somewhere. Certainly, some 15 year olds are mature enough to make those sorts of decisions, but most are not. So, we draw the line at 18 (in the US), where it is generally agreed that all people of that age are reasonably mature and can make their own decisions. Below that age, we have decided that they are still children, and not fully capable of making their own decisions. Because we have drawn this line, we must stick to it. To do otherwise is to make it meaningless.

I believe that if someone takes pornographic pictures of a person under eighteen, they should be severely punished. I believe that if a person takes pornographic pictures of child under, say, 13, then that person should be beaten, castrated, and thrown into a pit full of fire ants.

[rm']

Originally posted by ethan_h
There is a huge difference between wanting something, and wanting something knowing that you have to live wit the consequences of those actions.

There are numerous things for which consequences are unknown, yet adults still engage in. We don't know the physical effects of laser-eye surgery 10 years down the road. We don't know the long-term effects of genetically modified food. We don't fully understand the emotional effects of being involved in an organized religion. Yet do we ban these things? Why the double standard when it comes to children? It's as if as soon as the keyword "Child" pops up, people are willing to throw away their civil liberty. Not the freedom to photograph kids nude, mind you, but the liberty to make your own mistakes, and live by them.

[b]And you can't convince me that a child can realise fully the consequences of having sex or being photographed - they simply don't have the life experience to do so.

So, if you fully explained to a 14 year old the consequences of submitting to sex (and yes, a child of that age would understand if you told him/her everything that sex entailed), it would make it all right?

And this is all on the assumption that all this is consentual. There are many children out there that are forced into these situations due to threats of violence either to them, or to their families. You can't seriously believe that a 6 year old girl can consent to posing in lewd photographs with an adult five or six times her age??

I certainly agree. The problem is, if you see a pornographic image, can you tell if the participants consented? I do thing there is such a thing as legitimate child porn, and while I do think it is absolutely disgusting, I don't think the correct way to combat illegitimate child porn is to play the role of Thought Police.

[fwgx]

Originally Posted by rm' the c/p lover
So, if you fully explained to a 14 year old the consequences of submitting to sex (and yes, a child of that age would understand if you told him/her everything that sex entailed), it would make it all right?

I'm sorry but 14 year olds DO NOT, as ethan put it so well, have the life experiance to make that sort of decision. You'll also notice that there aren't an awful lot of 14 year old foregn ministers or 14 year old kids in charge of nukes. This is for the same reason. They may have a form of understanding but a wider picture that only comes with experiance is needed to make this type of, possibly, life changing decision. It's why we don't let kids smoke, drive cars or drink. The fact that some of them do these things is no reason not to try and protect them. From what I can see you have nothing against a sister, cousin or niece being exploited, because that's what it is. People eventually profit from the pictures of your siste, niece, cousin etc. That is exploitation and why the laws we have are there.

[rm']

Originally posted by Phily Baby
I'm sorry but 14 year olds DO NOT, as ethan put it so well, have the life experiance to make that sort of decision. You'll also notice that there aren't an awful lot of 14 year old foregn ministers or 14 year old kids in charge of nukes.

We do not trust kids in positions of power of others. We do, however, trust them in positions of power over themselves. It's very easy to kill yourself with a small calibre hunting rifle, a bicycle or even just walking down the street (although death is less and less likely with each thing listed).

But still, I think that sex between an adult and a minor shouldn't be practiced. Not because the child is unable to give consent, but because it is simply not the best action to take. Rather than open the child to life-long emotional damage (yes, I do agree with the three of you; kids cannot protect themselves. But in the pursuit of protecting our kids, we shouldn't throw our rights out the window), the adult can easily take pleasure in another adult.

[Curi0us_George]

Originally posted by rm'
There are numerous things for which consequences are unknown, yet adults still engage in. We don't know the physical effects of laser-eye surgery 10 years down the road. We don't know the long-term effects of genetically modified food. We don't fully understand the emotional effects of being involved in an organized religion. Yet do we ban these things? Why the double standard when it comes to children? It's as if as soon as the keyword "Child" pops up, people are willing to throw away their civil liberty. Not the freedom to photograph kids nude, mind you, but the liberty to make your own mistakes, and live by them.

Of course there's a double standard. They are children. Children are not adults, and children have the right to be protected from their own decisions. Should an authority figure (parent, government, teacher, et al) let a 13 year old choose if he/she wants to continue school? Should an authority figure let a child wander around New York unattended, at 3 o'clock in the morning?

There are reasons we don't let children make all of their own decisions. They are not always capable of doing so properly, nor are they fully capable of seeing the consequences of their actions.

Did you ever think of running away from home as a child? Where exactly would that have gotten you?

[Bilbo Baggins]

I would like to apologise for the link that I posted in an earlier thraed. I had no idea that the site within the link was still working, as I was led to believe that it had long since been removed from the internet. If anyone clicked the link from either mine, or RMs post, then I accept all responsibility.

[John M]

ahh, its cool mate. i didnt think you'd intentionally post that kinda shit here, even as perverted as you are :P

[GoldenSphynx]

damn it how come i come in soo late(i didnt see that link) , apology accepted bilbo(on behalf of the forumers, if i am allowed to take that measure)

[QHOBBES]

why dont they have like reverse-age strip joints, where you have to be
under 18 to be there and work there. theres some real profit to be
made on that!

*KEEP YOUR LAWS OFF MY BODY*

[Curi0us_George]

Originally posted by QHOBBES
why dont they have like reverse-age strip joints, where you have to be
under 18 to be there and work there. theres some real profit to be
made on that!

Because anyone performing at a place like that would still be doing so illegally. That's still pornography. Anyone going to a place like that would still be viewing child pornography.

Really good, teach them to enjoy and approve of child exploitation while they're still young . . .

[. - .... .- -. ....]

Originally posted by rm'


I certainly agree. The problem is, if you see a pornographic image, can you tell if the participants consented? I do thing there is such a thing as legitimate child porn, and while I do think it is absolutely disgusting, I don't think the correct way to combat illegitimate child porn is to play the role of Thought Police.

Maybe I have an oversimplified view of the world, but my take on this is as follows:

rm' do you have any younger sisters??

Assuming that you do, how would you feel if she got involved in child pornography?? If it was non-consentual I'd hope that you would do everything in your power to stop it, butwhat if it was consentual? What if someone persuaded her to do this, telling her that it would bring her good things - new clothes, toys, etc. Would it make you feel any better about the situation - after all, according to you there's nothing wrong with this.

As far as I am concerned, my point still stands. No child, no matter how mature he or she might seem to be, has the life experience or is responsible enough to make a decision such as this that could have such a huge impact on their lives. I disagree absolutely with your point questioning if explaining to a 14 year old the consequences of submitting to sex would make it all right. I don't believe for one minute that a child of that age would understand if you told him/her everything that sex entailed. Physically, maybe, but emotional consequences can't be taught - they are learned as we progress through life. Many adults wouldn't understand the consequences, but their chances are far higher than that of a child.

The analogy of the consequences of laser surgery is slightly flawed too. No doctor in their right mind would perform laser surgery on a child - they would wait until that child had developed fully before attempting it. Which compares exactly to what I have been saying all along. Pornography is not wrong, assuming that the person partaking is developed enough mentally for it.