|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Yeah, it seems symantec updated it's virus definitions again and all uninstallation files recognize like Trojan.Zlob. And now i even can't download and run nsis installation package.
Checked using: Norton Antivirus 2006. Symantec Antivirus 10.0 Corporate Edition. Developers, please do something with that idiots in symantec ![]() Nsis is a Great job, btw ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Debian user
(Forum King) Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Arch land
Posts: 4,917
|
Well, so you know is a false positive...don't need to be alarm.
Have a nice day ![]() * PC: Intel Core 2 DUO E6550 @ 2.33 GHz with 2 GB RAM: Archlinux-i686 with MATE. * Laptop: Intel Core 2 DUO T6600 @ 2.20 GHz with 4 GB RAM: Archlinux-x86-64 with MATE. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Major Dude
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 681
|
/ot
>> Developers, please do something with that idiots in symantec rough words - forum, ban these (...) Symantec consumers. Symatec products always suck - and they suck ev'time a bit more. I never had a postive false with NOD, but i see lots with Symantec, McAfee, KAV, and some more. and one more - symantec has a deal with microsoft that some nice tweaking and modifier tools where treaten as virus/trojans/aso. Greets, Brummelchen |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 37
|
well I am sure it is a false positive... but people using my installer are reporting Trojan.Zlob found with Norton Antivirus. I can't have that, can anyone do anything about this? or tell me what needs to be done to avoid it?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
M.I.A.
[NSIS Dev, Mod] Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Israel
Posts: 11,343
|
NSIS FAQ | NSIS Home Page | Donate $ "I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand." -- Confucius |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 37
|
Thank you, I'll follow steps 1 and 3 for now.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Major Dude
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 681
|
>> such as the newly released 2.18
And again i miss the News for that... Greets, Brummelchen |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6
|
Kichik,
I can second intelworker's issue. SAV 10 corporate with 7/1/06 v8 defs, which are latest as of right now (10:00 AM EST). I'll email Symantec, and give them your info, as I've got over multiple packages deployed to 70,000 users that can't be updated on the fly. ;-) Thanks for the help. Mike |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 8,434
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Debian user
(Forum King) Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Arch land
Posts: 4,917
|
I think there should be a sticky about false positives
* PC: Intel Core 2 DUO E6550 @ 2.33 GHz with 2 GB RAM: Archlinux-i686 with MATE. * Laptop: Intel Core 2 DUO T6600 @ 2.20 GHz with 4 GB RAM: Archlinux-x86-64 with MATE. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 8,434
|
Good idea. I'll see what I can do.
Edit: I'll let Kichik create an announcement post as he knows best ![]() -Stu |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 37
|
Does 2.18 cause the same problem ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Major Dude
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 737
|
I had quite a few of my installs wiped out by this latest problem with Symantec.
So far, however, rebuilding them in NSIS version 2.18 seems to have worked. (Using a different compression algorithm may also work, although I've found nothing concrete to support this claim.) |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 121
|
I have installed 2.18 and no problems at all.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4
|
I had 2.17 installed. Got the error. Found this message thread. Read that 2.18 doesn't have the problem, then downloaded and installed 2.18 (and selected the option to remove the old version). Right after installation, my Symantec deleted lmza_solid as shown in my attached screen shot.
I uninstalled 2.18 and reinstalled it. It didn't happen the second time. Weird. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Debian user
(Forum King) Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Arch land
Posts: 4,917
|
Well...instead unistalling NSIS, you can uninstall symantec and try another AV product?
![]() * PC: Intel Core 2 DUO E6550 @ 2.33 GHz with 2 GB RAM: Archlinux-i686 with MATE. * Laptop: Intel Core 2 DUO T6600 @ 2.20 GHz with 4 GB RAM: Archlinux-x86-64 with MATE. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 8,434
|
That's what I would suggest as well
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Major Dude
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 737
|
FYI:
After installing updates to Symantec (Corporate edition), the problems went away not only in my installations, but also 3rd party installations (such as the one for FileZilla and InkScape). Just in case it's useful for anyone, here are the details on the version I was using: Program version: 10.0.2.2000 Scan Engine: 61.1.0.11 Virus Definition File: 7/3/2006 rev.22 |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Major Dude
|
AntiVir, also known as Free-AV found the same virus in the installer of Ubisofts "The Settlers II - Heritage of Kings" Demo installer.
Yes, they seem to use NSIS! ![]() False Positive was corrected in recent definition updates, but i added it to the Wiki ![]() hand by comm@nder21 ---------- WiKi pages:CreateInternetShortcut|Enhanced FindWindow|Parse CSV-Data|Open/Close CD-Drive|Installer without Icon|Vista application compatibility |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|