![]() |
#81 |
Major Dude
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: where the llamas come from!
Posts: 952
|
Seconded. Keep up
![]() eeeee eeeeeee eeeee eeeee eeeee 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 88 8eee8 8e 8 8 8eee8 8e 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8eee8 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#82 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: austria
Posts: 43
|
really great DrO, really really good!
just a question, nothing very important since this will not happen very often: if i skip the current song (shortcut B) winamp plays another random song instead of the queued one. any chance to get rid of this? as said, not important, this one is also one of the most useful plugin of all times! greets quentin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#83 |
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 27,873
|
latest version, play and have fun
![]() -daz [edit] just been talking with quentin and if the main winamp window has the focus then fast forward by the 'B' key will not enqueue if shuffle is turned on (i know what the problem is already so that will be fixed for the next build). i'll also add in a config to determine if clicking on 'enqueue' on the dialog will exit the dialog or not. now how many have noticed the new version supports the number pad '.' key to open the dialog as well ![]() [/edit] Last edited by DrO; 3rd November 2003 at 20:17. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#84 |
Major Dude
|
OMFG this is nearly perfect!!!!! that bug that quentin suggested is quite minor to this one:
the enqueue list is backwards. if i enqueue hotel california then california love then california girl then it will start with california girl not hotel california, which it should. To think up an enqueued list of songs backwards is very wierd. No sig here folks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#85 | |
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 27,873
|
Quote:
-daz |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#86 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 142
|
It's been like witnessing the birth of a new world...and watching it grow. Who would have thought this thread would go to page 3??
Like GqSkrub said: "OMFG this is nearly perfect!!!!!" I ditto that!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#87 |
Major Dude
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: where the llamas come from!
Posts: 952
|
hmm. the "quentin bug" is minor, I didn't even know of the B shortcut.
![]() otherwise everything is fine. I don't quite understand GqSkrub's problem because with this build I still can enqueue only one song. Or does his problem relate with the "move after current" feature? then he is right. When using the feature the plugin should place the first song after the current playing. The next moved song should not move after the currently playing song but after the one enqueued before instead. but this can't be done now -I think -, because the plugin would have to remember a enqueued list now. perhaps it would make sense to queuemark these "moved after current songs" too? example: 5. life of agony - currently playing 6. ►1◄ hannes wader - moved after life of agony (as this plugin can already) 7. ►2◄ U2 - moved some seconds later 8. Johnny Cash - originally below life of agony before wader and then U2 were moved Any other song that would be moved with the "move after current" option should go directly after U2 and should be labelled ►3◄ (or ►2◄ if the new currently playing song is hannes wader already). the queuemark would let you know where exactly the next song would enqueue, because always moving directly after the currently playing song would let you have to create your playlist from behind. I wouldn't have thought to put queuemarks with this option too, but now thinking about it again, it would make sense. [an EDIT to sum my thoughts up: a song should not only moved, but enqueued too. and a new song should move after the last enqueued song, and only if there isn't any, directly after the current playing one] But anyway, with enqueuing only one song this plugin is already great, perfect to say. And that's the biggest gain already. the best winamp 2 feature for years. 5 thumbs up for DrO. eeeee eeeeeee eeeee eeeee eeeee 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 88 8eee8 8e 8 8 8eee8 8e 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8eee8 Last edited by amano; 3rd November 2003 at 23:14. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#88 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 476
|
5 thumbs up for amano
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#89 |
Major Dude
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: where the llamas come from!
Posts: 952
|
???
eeeee eeeeeee eeeee eeeee eeeee 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 88 8eee8 8e 8 8 8eee8 8e 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8eee8 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#90 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 142
|
Even though I will primarily use the "move after current", I don't personally see any need for change here. I have NO problem with the way it works now! I'd personally prefer it stay this way, and bump down the list as it does, without any "enquing order". It works exactly as it says it should..."move after current". (simple & sweet...perfect!!)
Now as for "enquing"...that's a different story...if more than one is going to be "enqued"... But the whole thing is already unbelievable! PS: Here's another 5 more thumbs up!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#91 |
Major Dude
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: where the llamas come from!
Posts: 952
|
hmm, did you read my post?
with one song there is no problem. it's straight and sweet now. But what if you want 2 songs, say, OMD and REM. if you would want to hear them in this order, you would have to move REM up first. that's (what I think) gqskrub meant that the enqueue list is backwards (and that he has to think up an enqueued list of songs backwards). EDIT: Maybe that could be an option: "Enqueue songs when moving after currently playing song"? or, the other way round "Always move after current played strictly" Opinions? eeeee eeeeeee eeeee eeeee eeeee 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 88 8eee8 8e 8 8 8eee8 8e 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8eee8 Last edited by amano; 4th November 2003 at 02:31. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#92 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 142
|
Well actually, I did. I think if you want 2 songs (or more), in specific order, then you might use the "enque" function, not the "move after current" (providing the "enque" function supports more than 1 "enque".
"Move after current" already does exactly what it implies. Yes, if I pick "song 1" and "move after current", then pick "song 2" with "move after current" it will play 1st, but that's what I want. I may have (changed my mind) and done this on purpose because I decided I wanted "song 2" to play next before "song 1". Many times as a DJ, at last minute I decide to drop something in quickly, and I want to see it interrupt playlist and play next. "Enque" and "move after current" must be different, as they already are... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#93 | |
Major Dude
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: where the llamas come from!
Posts: 952
|
Quote:
I don't think you should separate the "Move after current" option from any enqueuing context. I see it as the perfect solution to enqueue songs for people who don't use shuffle. The pure enqueue option is only interesting for people with shuffle on. when you have shuffle turned off and choose to enqueue a song close to the bottom of your PL, it will hit the bottom after playing and either stop or play the playlist from the beginning (that was already heard before!) if PL repeat is turned on. But maybe there could be an option in the preferences to "strictly move after current" EDIT: what I want to do is: -smply listen to my playlist in the (desired) order. -then suddenly feel to listen to my 3 favourite U2 songs. -enqueue the first song by clicking on "move after current" -then enqueue the second and the third one (by doing the same thing-"Move after Curent"). the songs move up in the playlist, get played, and the playlist continues to be played in its unique order. only the 3 U2 songs don't get played anymore, because they aren't at the bottom anymore (which is fine because I listened already to them). So I Play: PL Part 1 U2 Song 1 U2 Song 2 U2 Song 2 PL Part 2 (but without the U2 songs, that were moved up before) That's the way - I think- the "Move after Current" feature should work. Enqueuing for those who don't use shuffle. eeeee eeeeeee eeeee eeeee eeeee 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 88 8eee8 8e 8 8 8eee8 8e 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8eee8 Last edited by amano; 4th November 2003 at 02:35. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#94 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 142
|
Yes, I understand what you are trying to do, and I basically want the same thing, but slightly different.
I wasn't clear, and you mis-understood me. I know song #2 will play 1st...that's what I would want. I'm NOT trying to "enque" songs, but rather "insert and move" songs, as it currently works. If I "move" a couple of U2 songs up the list in (any) specific order(after currently playing), and then decide I want to insert Van Halen next, I don't want it to que up after U2, I want it to play next. Don't you see why "move after current" would need to work exactly as it does? Again, "move after current" & "enque" need to be different (as they are)! (in my opinion) I think you want to make "move after current" work more like "enque", but I don't see the need, since "enque" will (soon) do the job (with or without shuffle on). The problem I (now) see (from your point of view) is that "enque" will repeat the same songs later, if down the list. Apparently, that's why your trying to use the "move after current" function to move one or more songs? Your compromise would be to have an option to force exactly "move after next" or "move & enque after next" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#95 | |
Major Dude
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: where the llamas come from!
Posts: 952
|
Quote:
b)that would be my proposal. eeeee eeeeeee eeeee eeeee eeeee 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 88 8eee8 8e 8 8 8eee8 8e 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8eee8 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#96 | |
Major Dude
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: where the llamas come from!
Posts: 952
|
Quote:
I shuffle through my playlist and enqueue 3 songs (if that ever will work, let's put our hopes into Dro ![]() I could do so by hitting "Move after current" but then shuffle gets either turned off or the song doesn't get played at all. if shuffle is turned off, it will then play the playlist and then play many songs again, because winamp went there while shuffling before. I hope, you see the problem. Maybe there should really be 2 options (as you suggested)for the quick magic decisions. I start to like the idea. So "normal" enqueuing would be possible for shuffled playlists by hitting "Enqueue", and for normal playlists by hitting "Move after current". And for the quick decisions a "Force next option" which makes to song number one in any of both enqueue alternatives. eeeee eeeeeee eeeee eeeee eeeee 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 88 8eee8 8e 8 8 8eee8 8e 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8eee8 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#97 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 428
|
It's about time this plugin was made. Thank you so much.
I just wish it could be like it is in winamp3 with the right click and enqueue number in the playlist. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#98 |
Major Dude
|
if you guys read my post, i have the same exact problem except mine is with the enqueue.. it enqueues backwards. since it enqueues backwards, it also moves after current backwards.
@DrO why do you end your posts with "-daz"? and what do you mean by there is only one equeue list? and to fix, you'd just have to enqueue in the reverse order... dont'know how difficult it owuld be to code... what language is this plugin in? No sig here folks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#99 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 428
|
aw I thought I could enqueue multiple songs
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#100 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: austria
Posts: 43
|
enqueuing of one song is enough i think
keep it basic and simple, this is already one of the best plugins so far ![]() and i can't believe you named a bug after me ;D |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#101 | |
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 27,873
|
@GqSkrub:
Quote:
at the moment when using enqueue you can only enqueue one file. so if you enqueue a 'second' file then the 'first' file will be ignored. that should make more sense this time i hope. @idynkydnk: the aim is to get that in eventually ![]() @quentin: was good to have the bug pointed out, thanks @amano: for the 'move after current' listing i was intending on making it an option so that it will add the files after the first 'move' operation like you're asking for - easy to do that is (was already doing it partially in an early test build) for information, i've moved all settings to the config page and i've got it correctly working as a proper dialog for versions upto 2.81. the 'b' bug is fixed though i ran out of time to get anymore done ![]() so people know, the aim is to make everything configurable (like with the double-click default etc) so you can change the plugin to work as you want it to be like. out of interest, would you be interested in having the 'jump dialog' skinned in keeping with winamp style windows - asking since i've got code working that can do this and was wondering if it would be liked to implement it (might make more sense with the winamp5 release). the only down side is a 4/5k increase in the plugin size (until i can fiddle things around ![]() -daz |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#102 |
Major Dude
|
i am all for the skinned "j" window!! i was gonna suggest it but i thought that might be asking too much
![]() Well this might be a side effect of something else but you CAN enqueue more than one song. I was listening to some garbage, decided to enqueue a song(song1), decided that's not really the song i wanted to listen to, enqueued another song (song2). I FFW the garbage (checking to see if it works ![]() No sig here folks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#103 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: austria
Posts: 43
|
Quote:
and maybe you don't need to do a winamp5 release, maybe those guys will implement the enqueuing on their own ![]() dont forget to remind us when you publish the plugin ![]() cheers quentin |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#104 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 124
|
Just thought I'd add another 2 cents worth...
I know I speak for all of us in our continued gratitude to daz for his efforts. I respectfully ask on behalf of the DJ's and other radio related people who are watching these developments with fascination, if it's possible, after the requests of the majority are considered, and implemented, to include a means whereby the playlist cursor can jump forward to a nominated file or files, at a particular time, after the currently playing track has finished I realise this is a quantum leap sideways from the general discussion, but after seeing the lateral thinking employed, I feel encouraged to ask. The Low Power FM radio enthusiasts will see the benefit of this request, and knowing how many there are who are using Winamp as a playout system, there will be much rejoicing I'm sure. As always, I defer to the majority who are making their wishes known, and will patiently stand in the wings while the current development continues. Chris |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#105 |
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 27,873
|
the skinned window would be an option of course when i get it implemented.
@chris: in a later version i'll get it in - think of it as an extension to the 'enqueue' feature ![]() -daz |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#106 |
Major Dude
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: where the llamas come from!
Posts: 952
|
hmm. I don't care if it is skinned. why not. just implement it and see what it looks like. Shouldn't be high priority though.
eeeee eeeeeee eeeee eeeee eeeee 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 88 8eee8 8e 8 8 8eee8 8e 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8eee8 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#107 | |
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 27,873
|
Quote:
so people are aware of things, there won't be a new build for a few days. it should be thursday that i get the next build up and i hope to have a basic queue list up and running with that version (fingers crossed) incase i haven't already said this but thanks for all the 'good' suggestions and the feedback that people have made so thank you -daz |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#108 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: austria
Posts: 43
|
no, thank YOU
![]() anyway, i still don't see a need to enqueue more than one song but if you want to do it go on, seems there are some people that would like to have that option. it would be another nice method of making a playlist i guess but for me personaly, i'm satisfied with that version - and i'm looking forward what you're going to to with that plugin! very interesting ![]() keep on rocking, quentin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#109 | |
Major Dude
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: where the llamas come from!
Posts: 952
|
Quote:
![]() DrO, I'am glad you will make this full featured. Perhaps think of a button to enqueue in first position, for a sudden music idea. But I'm quite confident that you have already a good plan. May the gods protect your ways. eeeee eeeeeee eeeee eeeee eeeee 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 88 8eee8 8e 8 8 8eee8 8e 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 88 8 88 8 8eee8 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#110 |
Major Dude
|
i definately can reproduce it. try enqueueing multiple songs all at once.
No sig here folks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#111 |
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 27,873
|
can you post exactly what you are doing, what settings you are using and maybe a screen shot of the playlist to show what's meant to be played please.
-daz |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#112 |
Major Dude
|
i've posted it a couple times already but ill post it again... more detailed this time:
i open winamp 5 beta 2 with the most recent update of this plugin with the modern skin and do the following. <<<Example 1>>> press play - (song 0) starts playing. "Song 0"(elapsed time 0:30) I decide i'm liking this band and enqueue "Song 1" "Song 0"(elasped time 0:50) To test plugin, i enqueue another song, "Song 2". "Song 0" ends|| "Song 2" starts to play. This means plugin takes most recently queued song and plays it. So what happened to the first song i enqueued? It comes up Next. "Song 2"(elapsed time 0:25) to test both the FFW bug and the general format of the plugin, I FFW. Low and behold, "Song 1" is next. so the plugin played the songs in this order: --------------------------------- Song 0 - not choice of plugin Song 2 Song 1 --------------------------------- <<<example 2>>> if during song 0 i enqueue five songs it will play them in this order ---------------------------------------------------- song 0 song 5 song 4 song 3 song 2 song 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- If after those five songs play, i rewind back through the songs, it will go through the list in reverse: song 1 song 2 song 3 song 4 song 5 song 0 Get what i'm saying now? it SHOULD go like this: <<example 3>> song 0 song 1 song 2 song 3 song 4 song 5 .... in the order of enqueue, not like how it does in example 2. I'm not sure how screen shots would help so i hope this makes everything more clear. No sig here folks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#113 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 142
|
I like the stuff simple, but functional. I prefer Winamp "Classic" and personally do not care for skins. I like the "J" window the way it looks now, but if skins are a selectable option, then so be it...as long as I can turn them off...(but like Amano said, it shouldn't be high priority). I prefer "substance", and so far, this plugin has it already!
Also, (like Quentin), enqueing more than one song is not a priority for me, but others may consider it very important. The double-click default options however sounds like a REALLY SWEET add-on! Hey, here's one...is drag & drop an option? That way you could put the selections anywhere you wanted them. (Just a silly thought...more low-priority considerations.) DrO: Can't thank you enough! We're hanging on your every word! This little "goodie" is a true "diamond in the ruff"!!! How many out there haven't discovered it's awsome birth yet? (too bad Winamp, for years acknowledged this wish, but ignored it..) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#114 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 379
|
Enqueueing more than one song is what would make this plugin perfect, that and implementing the visual cues into the playlist (hardest part i would imagine)
If those two get implemented, functionality has already exeeded winamp3 ![]() EDIT: Not realy a bug, (and possibly a handy feature(?)), pressing f3 in the playlist dialog, brings up the old jump menu |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#115 |
Major Dude
|
so apparently i'm the only one that can enqueue multiple songs?
No sig here folks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#116 |
Major Dude
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wasabidev
Posts: 606
|
that's strange, but yes, it appears so. i clicked enqueue on two songs, it went skipped to the one i enqueued last, then went on to the next song in the order of the playlist.
I assume you've tried it several times, to see if it's consistent. Have you tried reinstalling wa5? don't know why it would help, but maybe. I don't suppose you have multiple copies of the plugin installed somehow? ~WHEREamI |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#117 | ||
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 27,873
|
@Dipso: i'll check that out, ta
Quote:
![]() Quote:
@GqSkrub: thanks for the detail, will fully test it tonight though i've got to repeat that the current builds only support a single enqueue list at the moment - i'm adding that option in tonight (basic at least) @amano: i've added in the 'move after current' listing option to the plugin now. if the song playing changes / the option is disabled / dialog is closed then the position of the list after the current song is reset - sensible i think to do it that way ![]() also all future releases will correctly save settings to the winamp ini file - so you can keep your changes between runs at last ![]() -daz |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#118 |
Major Dude
|
@whereamI... i might reinstal winamp5, but why? i have multiple enqueue possible, backwards, but possible.
No sig here folks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#119 |
Major Dude
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wasabidev
Posts: 606
|
hehe... that's true.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#120 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Norway
Posts: 379
|
Now thats what i call a bug thats not that bad Skrub
![]() ![]() Also, DR.O Have you found out if its possible for a plugin to alter the output in the playlist? Having the queue visisble without the j dialog open would be killer, and if the alt+click gets added aswhell, who needs the wa3 style queue? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|