Intercourse and Intelligence

EfaustuS9 · 4th May 2007, 06:04

can cognitive capacity be a determent towards coitus.... maybe

Phyltre · 4th May 2007, 06:29

Aw, man, I was gonna quote a sentence of that for internetly truths but the whole thing is gold.

Makes sense. Smarter people overanalyze and are socially awkward, are too different to identify with their peers and are socially awkward, or are too smart to accidentally makes some chillens after Prom.

rockouthippie · 4th May 2007, 06:46

Quote:

Originally posted by Phyltre
Smarter people overanalyze

Or is it that stupid people under-analyse?. Taking a responsible attitude toward sex means you would have a lot less of it.

Phyltre · 4th May 2007, 07:01

Well yeah, I meant that too but I'm reticent about wording it that way since most people don't want to admit that maybe sex should wait.

Heh, I've been in a relationship for six years now and we're still waiting for marriage. So, yes, I have this responsible attitude down pat.

Now if only I could stop chewing all my pencils down to splinters...

rockouthippie · 4th May 2007, 07:14

6 years?. Now let's not OVER-analyse?

I think an engagement that long is gonna get you in trouble.

sgtfuzzbubble011 · 4th May 2007, 15:36

Six years? Damn man, you must be ready to explode.

fc*uk · 4th May 2007, 22:32

awesome. Chemists rank on the top of the list for no sex.

Heh.

Leave it to some bumbling idiot with noting better to do and no better way to spend funding to put out a study like this.

1. No indication of pooled sample size aside from 1000s ... there is a big difference in standard deviations under the curve depending upon if that number was 1000 or 9999.

2. No confidance level stated. What, 99.9%, 99%, 95%, 90%??? Please god, say it is not lower then 90%..... These all range from about six to one standard deviation and show a good deal about the accuracy of the study.

3. "Depending on the specific age and gender, an adolescent with an IQ of 100 was 1.5 to 5 times more likely to have had intercourse than a teen with a score of 120 or 130" .... Mine is ... well, never mind. According to this, a snowball in hell has a better chance making it in hell than I do of getting laid.

4. Edit made me cut 4... didn't feel like renumbering

5. Sampling from two population pools gives something that a scientist would call a significant BIAS to your study. Don't be like the FDA; try nation wide next time asshat.

6. Any study conducted with such a small sample pool is bound to be fundamentally flawed. Sorry, but thousands does not accurately represent millions. See point 5 and add to this.

IN OTHER NEWS .....

OH noes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Did you hear?????? The FDA concluded that ***** causes heart attacks. Oh fucking noes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Lets kill the drug along with Merck!

Little known fact: sample pool was older adult males with diabetes and/or existing heart conditions.

People need to learn how to conduct a fucking study anymore....

edit: yes, you may move this to the bitchlist now

skryingbreath · 5th May 2007, 03:36

If this Studio Art figure was accurate I should be having sex nonstop.

I wish it were.

Although it would be interesting to see the effects of sex on creativity. You'd have to determine what is considered creative thought, though.

ElChevelle · 5th May 2007, 04:16

Keep your hands to yourself.

mikm · 5th May 2007, 04:31

I'm surprised CS is so low.

4th May 2007, 06:04	#1
EfaustuS9 Major Dude Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: MA, USA Posts: 1,895	Intercourse and Intelligence can cognitive capacity be a determent towards coitus.... maybe

4th May 2007, 22:32	#7
fcuk Moderator* Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Atlantic Beach Posts: 8,127	awesome. Chemists rank on the top of the list for no sex. Heh. Leave it to some bumbling idiot with noting better to do and no better way to spend funding to put out a study like this. 1. No indication of pooled sample size aside from 1000s ... there is a big difference in standard deviations under the curve depending upon if that number was 1000 or 9999. 2. No confidance level stated. What, 99.9%, 99%, 95%, 90%??? Please god, say it is not lower then 90%..... These all range from about six to one standard deviation and show a good deal about the accuracy of the study. 3. "Depending on the specific age and gender, an adolescent with an IQ of 100 was 1.5 to 5 times more likely to have had intercourse than a teen with a score of 120 or 130" .... Mine is ... well, never mind. According to this, a snowball in hell has a better chance making it in hell than I do of getting laid. 4. Edit made me cut 4... didn't feel like renumbering 5. Sampling from two population pools gives something that a scientist would call a significant BIAS to your study. Don't be like the FDA; try nation wide next time asshat. 6. Any study conducted with such a small sample pool is bound to be fundamentally flawed. Sorry, but thousands does not accurately represent millions. See point 5 and add to this. IN OTHER NEWS ..... OH noes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Did you hear?????? The FDA concluded that ***** causes heart attacks. Oh fucking noes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Lets kill the drug along with Merck! Little known fact: sample pool was older adult males with diabetes and/or existing heart conditions. People need to learn how to conduct a fucking study anymore.... edit: yes, you may move this to the bitchlist now Trancectro/electro-house/electro \| Are You Hard?

5th May 2007, 04:31	#10
mikm Major Dude Join Date: May 2001 Location: somewhere else Posts: 1,255	I'm surprised CS is so low. powered by C₂H₅OH

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

4th May 2007, 06:29	#2
Phyltre Forum King Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Freefall Posts: 2,751	Aw, man, I was gonna quote a sentence of that for internetly truths but the whole thing is gold. Makes sense. Smarter people overanalyze and are socially awkward, are too different to identify with their peers and are socially awkward, or are too smart to accidentally makes some chillens after Prom.

4th May 2007, 07:01	#4
Phyltre Forum King Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Freefall Posts: 2,751	Well yeah, I meant that too but I'm reticent about wording it that way since most people don't want to admit that maybe sex should wait. Heh, I've been in a relationship for six years now and we're still waiting for marriage. So, yes, I have this responsible attitude down pat. Now if only I could stop chewing all my pencils down to splinters...

4th May 2007, 07:14	#5
rockouthippie Banned Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Oregon Posts: 11,002	6 years?. Now let's not OVER-analyse? I think an engagement that long is gonna get you in trouble.

4th May 2007, 15:36	#6
sgtfuzzbubble011 Join Date: Jun 2000 Posts: 60,837	Six years? Damn man, you must be ready to explode.

5th May 2007, 03:36	#8
skryingbreath Post initializing... Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 3,065	If this Studio Art figure was accurate I should be having sex nonstop. I wish it were. Although it would be interesting to see the effects of sex on creativity. You'd have to determine what is considered creative thought, though.

5th May 2007, 04:16	#9
ElChevelle Moderator Alumni Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: the MANCANNON! Posts: 22,436	Keep your hands to yourself.