The difference between topless men, and topless women.

[baafie]

Originally posted by Sandman2012
I never came on a topless man's chest.

lol

Like White Raven said.. it's all society and culture.

[Bilbo Baggins]

Of course if anyone wants to start making a change to that culture...

[Sandman2012]

Hi baafie.

[kingo'mountain]

heres a P.O.V from a porn junkie:

sex is trully overrated, i mean... people link what they see to sex quite alot... people see a nipple... their minds go nuts!

our bodies have a purpose, we were born with them, and we have them for all our stinkin lives, nudist and naturist (not the same, ill explain) resorts praise the human body by showing it like it should have been since we were born... get this: clothes are just phrickin sheets of cloth, rubber and cotton.. covering our body parts.

since we were very very young, many of us didnt know what modesty is, but then our parents said its inapropriate (spelling?) to walk without our diapers or underwear, then we grew... and got the morals from our parents to be used in our lives, since then.. we are educated to wear clothes to hide a plain piece of skin and flesh...
in fact, those "boobs" are just milk bags to feed their young, thats all there is to it. your mind interperet certain body parts to sex coz thats the 1st way you encountered boobs, with a porn magazine (even softcore) and web sites.

a bit off topic: nudist camps and naturist resorts are a bit different, youre ALLOWED (dont have to, though) to go semi-nude or full nude on both... but in a nudist resort you dont get to nature whilst in naturist resorts you do (never been to both, i just know from resources). first timers to the resorts WILL be sexually active only because of the new experience, but later on the excitement fades and you get more and more regular with them...
i dont know if its true, but some nudist places allow underaged kids to go nude as well, i dont think its such a good idea, specially for those "with the special taste"

in conclusion: boobs are just a state of a horny mind

[horse-fly]

Originally posted by BullGawD
Nah ah. It's a science in the same way history is a "science". In that post WWII hipster-science rush among the Academy to lay claim to the respect and funding being granted to hardline sciences. There's a fact side and an interpretive side....

Freud's theories would fall under that category of science, while psychology uses actual measurements and stuff that other sciences take into account... The only reason i am not letting go of this subject is that i have a final coming up (i don't know when, but some time soon)

Now freud is known for his masssive array of sexual theories and psychoanalysis (which i will focus on). There was absolutely no method to this madness, everything seemed to point back to sexual encounters in ones early life which usually have never happened, and they don't even have that theraputic aspect... as one psychologist (Fred Crews) said...

Originally posted by Fredrick Crews (Introducton to Psychology, James W Kalat, Page 496)
...there is literally nothing to be said, scientifically and therapeutically, to the advantage of the entire Freudian system or any of its constituent dogmas.

on last note: psychology is a relatively science, but it has not the refinement of "traditional" sciences such as physics and chemistry

[BullGawD]

once again, you've slightly shifted the focus of the argument and still made no point. Your comp teachers must love you.

You didn't really say anything I disagree with this time, but as before, what exactly is your point? That your teacher told you Freud is meaningless? Fair 'nuff. But that still doesn't categorically mean his ideas are untestable.

In fact, my first official science experiment was a meaningless experiment. I'd just built a shoe-box crystal diode radio with a loop antenna. My experiment revolved around adjusting the number of antenna loops in relation to frequency reception. (sue me, I was quite young. If you don't follow - just know that the two factors aren't related.) Completely meaningless. Completely tested.

[horse-fly]

lol, i guess i am screwed on my final...

ah fine, i give up... it goes way off topic, and i have papers that are weeks late to catch up on.

sorry about the sidetrack.... back to the boob-tube i go

[BullGawD]

That sucks dood. Psych can be hard. Don't give up though. Have you tried talking someone into studying with you?

[horse-fly]

no, you see i was arguing a point that i thought i heard in class, but my prof was talking about freud and what makes a good theory in the same lecture, and then when i blew off the dust from my book and opened it, i saw that freuds theories (atleast the majority of them) are testable, but just proven incorrect.. and BG don't you worry about me, i am in a Community College so if i do fail the class (highly unlikely) i just pay the fee again for the class... it is only 17$ a unit, how bad ass is that!!!

[cyu]

one word: FEMINISTS