Old 19th December 2003, 15:23   #1
evantongeren
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: grand rapids
Posts: 2
Riaa Eat A Fat One....

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3758771/
evantongeren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th December 2003, 15:27   #2
zetafunction
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 99
A slightly longer article on the same thing is @ http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/12/19/mu...eut/index.html
zetafunction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th December 2003, 16:30   #3
zootm
Forum King
 
zootm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: the nether reaches of bonnie scotland
Posts: 13,375

zootm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th December 2003, 18:36   #4
Kinetik*
Forum Antagonist
(Major Dude)
 
Kinetik*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Collective Rectum
Posts: 1,154
pwnt


Procrastinators of the world unite!... Tomorrow!
Kinetik* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th December 2003, 18:40   #5
Joel
Debian user
(Forum King)
 
Joel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Arch land
Posts: 4,917
I thought RIAA was gone


* PC: Intel Core 2 DUO E6550 @ 2.33 GHz with 2 GB RAM: Archlinux-i686 with MATE.
* Laptop: Intel Core 2 DUO T6600 @ 2.20 GHz with 4 GB RAM: Archlinux-x86-64 with MATE.
Joel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th December 2003, 19:20   #6
ScorLibran
Resident Floydian
 
ScorLibran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,222
Quote:
Cary Sherman, president of the recording industry group, said the ruling “unfortunately means we can no longer notify illegal file sharers before we file lawsuits against them to offer the opportunity to settle outside of litigation.”
I think what he means is that the ruling “unfortunately means we can no longer discover the names of illegal file sharers in order to file lawsuits against them.” Perhaps he was confused.....or tired?

Here's the article in The Register on the same subject.

Quote:
The RIAA, of course, contends that blocking a user's access to the Internet would solve the infringement problem, giving customers no way to trade files. The court, however, again sided with Verizon here, saying an individual's access to copyrighted songs and to the Internet are two different matters all together.

The judges were harsh at times in the opinion, calling some of the RIAA's arguments silly and largely saying the RIAA has no merits for its case.
Makes me wonder... Does the RIAA think internet access is a privilege or a right? I bet they'd answer that question wrongly.

----- Forward the revolution.

I'm a psychosomatic sister running around without a leash.
ScorLibran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th December 2003, 19:22   #7
White Raven
Little Winged One
 
White Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canada, now UK
Posts: 4,174
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LOOOOOOOOOOOOOSEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRS!
Hah, I'm glad the bastards lost that case, they're acting like they're so goddamn innocent, when really, they aren't at all. In reality the musicians only get something like 8% of the money they generate. In short, I consider RIAA to be nothing more than a large, overfed pimp.

just as feathery as ever | portfolio | a poignant quote
White Raven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th December 2003, 19:31   #8
Kinetik*
Forum Antagonist
(Major Dude)
 
Kinetik*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Collective Rectum
Posts: 1,154
I downloaded all the songs off of blink-182's new album and mailed them (The artists) the money that the album would have costed me in a store directly. They deserved it, not their label.


Procrastinators of the world unite!... Tomorrow!
Kinetik* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th December 2003, 19:36   #9
evantongeren
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: grand rapids
Posts: 2
Thats Pretty Honest of you Kinetik. Either way I'm not paying anything for my new "Foriegner" songs! I totally kicks ass!
evantongeren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th December 2003, 19:41   #10
Vie
Forum King
 
Vie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Thoron fields and Duranium shadows. Posts: Crap mostly
Posts: 8,003
You do realise that the artists adress' arnt there adress'?

Member most in need of SpellCheck Lifetime Achievement Award

I'm a Twitch Streamer these days, it's weird.
Vie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th December 2003, 19:44   #11
Kinetik*
Forum Antagonist
(Major Dude)
 
Kinetik*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Collective Rectum
Posts: 1,154
I looked up Tom DeLonge's address from somewhere. I'm sure it was his address. I can't remember where I found it out at, though. Lol.


Procrastinators of the world unite!... Tomorrow!
Kinetik* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th December 2003, 19:53   #12
Vie
Forum King
 
Vie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Thoron fields and Duranium shadows. Posts: Crap mostly
Posts: 8,003
There is one confuesed stranger sitting at home looking at the money right now.

Member most in need of SpellCheck Lifetime Achievement Award

I'm a Twitch Streamer these days, it's weird.
Vie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th December 2003, 21:18   #13
ihatejelly0
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: so. cal
Posts: 38
.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg post-67-1071871459.jpg (19.0 KB, 207 views)
ihatejelly0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2003, 05:03   #14
henry3k56
Forum King
 
henry3k56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Internet Posts: 3 Trillion
Posts: 4,241
Anyway. The RIAA will be here as long as there are illegal downloads or anything that is hurting their industry business.

henry3k56 | Summer is here.
My Flickr Page & Frontierra | Posting Since September 2001.
henry3k56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2003, 07:59   #15
ScorLibran
Resident Floydian
 
ScorLibran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,222
Actually, it's a more broad reason than that, even. As with almost any corporation, it's all about the M*O*N*E*Y.

The fact that the RIAA cries "revenue loss" because of illegal downloading doesn't mean that's their main incentive. Illegal downloads are likely not so damaging in themselves to their profit margin. It's more that they can use illegal downloading as an excuse to crack down on people in an attempt to shore up profits in many ways.

They're not so different from many of the world's for-profit businesses. If I convinced my company that not wearing any clothes below the waist would increase profits, there would be a flock of streakers walking around in my town every day at lunch time.

The RIAA will do anything to increase their revenues. That they are pulling the "stop illegal music sharing" bandwagon is just incidental. Something they can point to and scream about. A crutch. An icon. Whatever you want to call it. If illegal downloads all stopped tomorrow, the RIAA would not "quietly step off the stage". Their motives and intentions are much darker. Think "Microsoft, circa 1989". Hardly any competition, lots of financial and legal muscle, a myriad of strategic partnerships. They're poised for more domination than they have now, even. Soon, we'll long for the era we're in now. In several years, it won't be this pleasant.

I'm a psychosomatic sister running around without a leash.
ScorLibran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2003, 11:09   #16
eleet-2k2
Forum King
 
eleet-2k2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Mobil Ave.
Posts: 5,381
I'm glad they can no longer file lawsuits. Bastards. Now I heard the same thing is going to start happening in Canada, but ISP's do not have to give out user info like the US.

"Welcome to the Island of people who know too much."..."Did you really think balloons would stop him?!"
See what I'm listening too.
eleet-2k2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2003, 21:16   #17
godoncrack
Forum King
 
godoncrack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: http://www.mossad.gov.il
Posts: 2,135
what about past lawsuits?
remember that 12-year old girl?
godoncrack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2003, 21:29   #18
papadoc
Comfortably Numb
(Forum King)
 
papadoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,619
Don't kid yourselves into a false security about this ruling.
The RIAA will find a way around it.
They've proven in the past they have no regard for the law.
If the law doesn't suit them, they have it changed.
Like they did with this one.
It lasted long enough before it was overturned, to strike
fear and loathing into the p2p community.

So here's what I think we need to ask.
If this law they used to sue people is now wrong,
doesn't that make the lawsuits prior to now, null and void?
papadoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2003, 21:47   #19
Kinetik*
Forum Antagonist
(Major Dude)
 
Kinetik*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Collective Rectum
Posts: 1,154
Quote:
So here's what I think we need to ask.
If this law they used to sue people is now wrong,
doesn't that make the lawsuits prior to now, null and void?
Ex Post-Facto (Before the fact)law says no. It's like if the courts pass a law that posting on internet forums is illegal, they can't come get us for doing it before they passed the law, but they can if we did it afterwords.


Procrastinators of the world unite!... Tomorrow!
Kinetik* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th December 2003, 21:55   #20
papadoc
Comfortably Numb
(Forum King)
 
papadoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,619
Guess your'e right on that Kinetik*
But wouldn't it be great if the people who've been sued,
could just rip up their lawsuits?
And say screw you, RIAA!
papadoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2003, 02:28   #21
InvisableMan
Ninja Master!
(Forum King)
 
InvisableMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hotel California
Posts: 4,333
i can finally get back up to my normal speed of downloading again and restart having EVERYTHING going at once instead of just irc 24/7 and the other standalones maybe 20 mins a day.

i bet the riaa loves me.
Quote:
<~InvisableMan> I owe the RIAA $2,336,700,000 (15,578 mp3s)
currently downloading anywhere between 5-50 a day (sometimes i'll get 300 in a night at a lan party or something, i like getting entire game/anime soundtracks from friends) and uploading 500-2500 a day

of course i DO support my favorite artists, alas, if they lowered the price to maybe $10 a cd instead of 20-30 a cd, i would buy alot more and save myself the trouble of downloading and searching and uploading and downloading constantly. but oh well. i hope the riaa burns for the social atrocities they commit (sueing 12 year olds and whatnot)

rant rant rant rant rant. come and get me you red diaper doper babies. you'll never get a damn penny unless you rip it from my cold dead hands.
InvisableMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2003, 03:24   #22
s1138
Alumni?
 
s1138's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: joja
Posts: 6,936
Send a message via ICQ to s1138 Send a message via AIM to s1138 Send a message via Yahoo to s1138
this is good news

though, as of recently, ive only been downloading songs the RIAA doesnt own anyway.

s1138 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2003, 03:55   #23
morgado
Major Dude
 
morgado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: away from my baby
Posts: 1,097
Send a message via ICQ to morgado
I think musicians should open some pay-pal stuff ...
So we could download music and pay direct to them ...
RIAA, a fat one ...

I Love You Ana Luiza
MSN
morgado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2003, 04:47   #24
cpukiller
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Marklar
Posts: 50
Send a message via AIM to cpukiller Send a message via Yahoo to cpukiller
Shit, if the RIAA sues me, do they think I will ever buy a CD again? Atleast now I buy a CD every once in a while.

They aren't helping themselves any. And I used to buy more CDs before they started their shit, and now buy much, much less.


Want a dynamic winamp signature? See http://www.viralsound.com
cpukiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Winamp & Shoutcast Forums > Community Center > General Discussions

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump