i pood my pants - Page 2

Fickle · 3rd April 2005, 04:05

Quote:

Originally posted by MaTTFURY
everyones smarter than everyone in winamp forums....

?

jerimiah40 · 3rd April 2005, 04:10

I have FF, but it never occured to me to check it there... Hmmm...

Wow, I really hijacekd this thread! But, who cares!

Can people who suspect that its not displaying properly post a screenshot? Better yet, email them to me at Jerimiah[dot]40[at]Gmail[dot]com.

BigMoosie · 3rd April 2005, 04:17

EDIT: sayed something stupid...

Print · 3rd April 2005, 04:18

Quote:

Originally posted by jerimiah40
Jerimiah[dot]40[at]Gmail[dot]com.

? couldn't you just put jerimiah40@googlemail.com

(I wrote googlemail in case their is a reason you didn't post your email).

Are you worried about spam bots or something?

jerimiah40 · 3rd April 2005, 04:21

I dunno, I guess I could have. But yeah, I'd rather not have spambots attacking my inbox, and I heard that it helped to not hyperlink to it directly. Now that I think about it though, it doens't make much sense. Is it true?

@bigmoosie - No comment

PulseDriver · 3rd April 2005, 04:21

Yes

jerimiah40 · 3rd April 2005, 04:23

Well, thats kinda fucked up. I'll have to play around with that. Anyone have any ideas what could be happening? Also, can somebody who has Opera or some other popular browser check it out for me?

ElChevelle · 3rd April 2005, 04:24

Quote:

Originally posted by Germ
Hmm, I think it's time for some bannings.

Nothing warms the soul on a saturday night at home than a few good bannings.
You know, I'll never forget my first banning. It was a cold wintry day in July, when my banfinger got it's first true test.

Print · 3rd April 2005, 04:26

Quote:

Originally posted by jerimiah40
I dunno, I guess I could have. But yeah, I'd rather not have spambots attacking my inbox, and I heard that it helped to not hyperlink to it directly. Now that I think about it though, it doens't make much sense. Is it true?

@bigmoosie - No comment

Well even if you are worried about spam (which I don't htink you should here). Just put jerimiah40 @google.com - that way it's still easy to read but will not be picked up by any suspected bots.

BigMoosie · 3rd April 2005, 04:29

Quote:

Originally posted by blueprint_n9ne
? couldn't you just put jerimiah40@googlemail.com

(I wrote googlemail in case their is a reason you didn't post your email).

Are you worried about spam bots or something?

there is no such thing as googlemail.com

PulseDriver · 3rd April 2005, 04:30

To get an idea, you should at least start checking the CSS with the jigsaw at w3c.org... here is the result I got:

http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/v...usermedium=all

mikm · 3rd April 2005, 04:31

Most everybody would realize that goooglemail.com == gmail.com and that he wrote it out "fully" to fool spambots and idiots.

ElChevelle · 3rd April 2005, 04:35

Quote:

Originally posted by BigMoosie
there is no such thing as googlemail.com

Actually, now that you've utilized it in a post, technically, there is such a thing.

Print · 3rd April 2005, 04:47

Quote:

Originally posted by BigMoosie
there is no such thing as googlemail.com

Jesus your an idiot. Did you read the information in brackets??

Fickle i'm gonna have to quote you here..

Quote:

Sometimes I wonder how some people get thier pants on in the morning.

jerimiah40 · 3rd April 2005, 04:49

Well, I validated the CSS, and got it to be fine. Than, I went to do the HTML, and it couldn't do it properly, because the first line wasn't a Doctype Declaration. In the file however, it is, but in the source code, its not. Why? Because, Geocities puts a whole bunch of shit in at the top for no apparent reason. So, I did it with the file saved on my computer, and when I do it like that, Its perfectly fine HTML 4.01 Transitional. So, the HTML is valid except for geocities 2 cents, and the CSS is fine as well. This is really messed up.

PulseDriver · 3rd April 2005, 04:52

Yes, but you don't need to validate the document with html, you can validate the css file separatly...

ElChevelle · 3rd April 2005, 04:53

Validate what you want, but we won't validate your existence here.

Quote:

Originally posted by MaTTFURY
everyones smarter than everyone in winamp forums....

WRONG!

CHEV is smarter than everyone in winamp forums....

jerimiah40 · 3rd April 2005, 04:54

I did validate the CSS file seperately, it said it was fine.

This is pissing me off, I'm starting a new thread for this.

ElChevelle · 3rd April 2005, 04:55

Great, can you call that one "I ate my own turds"?

PulseDriver · 3rd April 2005, 04:56

LOL! Where do you get all these ideas from... (really)

ScorLibran · 3rd April 2005, 04:57

Quote:

Originally posted by missyob
Ok, I am the nice one here in the forums and try to see the best of everyone, hence the name forum mom.

I'm as nice as you! (Well, almost.

)

And you know what prawns are, babe. I thought we'd had them before. Or did I dream it?

ElChevelle · 3rd April 2005, 05:02

Quote:

Originally posted by PulseDriver
LOL! Where do you get all these ideas from... (really)

I steal them from really bad, out of work comedians.

Mattress · 3rd April 2005, 05:07

Quote:

Originally posted by PulseDriver
It's nothing wrong with it, but as a commercial webdeveloper, you should follow the w3c(http://www.w3c.org) recommendations, which recommend that you only use tables for data, eg. the periodic tabel, or buss departure info and such, where every cell (except those with the row/colum info) have the same type of data eg. atoms or buss departure times.

Validations of various sites:
google.com
yahoo.com
aol.com
amazon.com
cnn.com
weather.com
espn.com
microsoft.com
apple.com
nytimes.com
webmd.com
time.com
ebay.com
mapquest.com
sourceforge.net
winamp.com
adobe.com
macromedia.com
Man, I hope none of those sites paid for their web design because not one of them validates.

These are what I could think of off the top of my head. I'd be interested in finding out what popular websites actually do validate.

Print · 3rd April 2005, 05:32

Quote:

Originally posted by PulseDriver
LOL! Where do you get all these ideas from... (really)

He should be a stand up comedian or comedy writer. And usually I say this to people who think they're funy but tell shitty jokes.

But this time I mean it. Chev is fucking hilarious.

mikm · 3rd April 2005, 05:48

Quote:

Originally posted by Mattress
I'd be interested in finding out what popular websites actually do validate.

The W3 site validates

The only popular non-geek website I know off the top of my head that validates is albinoblacksheep.

BigMoosie · 4th April 2005, 15:55

deviantart validates

PulseDriver · 4th April 2005, 21:51

Yes, but Deviant Art doesn't follow the recommendation of not using tables for layout.

zootm · 4th April 2005, 22:00

Every site listed is very old, also.

PulseDriver · 4th April 2005, 22:05

Well, I consider every site in XHTML to be quite new, I don't know what you mean about that zootm?

Deviant Art uses XHTML 1.0 it starts off good with divs.. but once the tricky layout starts, it's tables all the way.

gaekwad2 · 4th April 2005, 22:06

Quote:

Originally posted by Mattress
Validations of various sites:
...
Man, I hope none of those sites paid for their web design because not one of them validates.
These are what I could think of off the top of my head. I'd be interested in finding out what popular websites actually do validate.

Try Slashdot.

protegechris · 5th April 2005, 01:39

Quote:

Originally posted by BigMoosie
Hi, wow the first decent person here!

My name is benjamin, im doing year 11 at school and contrary to popular belief am actually quite intelligent, no1 of 150 people in both maths and science and no4 in english.

I design websites and am trying to save up for a car. I like music, computer programming, art, and my favourite food is Prawns.

sounds like me only I don't make threads called "i pood my pants", and I don't settle for number four in anything..

mikm · 5th April 2005, 23:58

Quote:

Originally posted by BigMoosie
deviantart validates

Really?

BigMoosie · 6th April 2005, 02:20

hmmm... for some reason i remember it did, i guess not. anyway it doesnt really matter if a site validates.

zootm · 6th April 2005, 02:54

Quote:

Originally posted by gaekwad2
Try Slashdot.

You're a funny guy.

Wolfgang · 6th April 2005, 02:57

Quote:

Originally posted by PulseDriver
Deviant Art uses XHTML 1.0 it starts off good with divs.. but once the tricky layout starts, it's tables all the way.

Yeah, I'm having some trouble with divs. They render differently in IE and other browsers. I find it hard to get things decent-looking across browsers.

Quote:

Originally posted by mikm
The W3 site validates

Uses tables though.

Mattress · 6th April 2005, 04:05

heh, slashdot uses html 3.2 DTD

Obedo · 10th April 2005, 18:26

Man BigMoosie your like Special Ed with a computer

ElChevelle · 10th April 2005, 18:28

He's like Special Ed with TWO hands up his bottom.

BigMoosie · 11th April 2005, 01:48

STFU!!!!

Fickle · 11th April 2005, 01:55

BigMoosie, have you ever said anything intelligent? Is there going to be a time where I will enjoy one of your posts? Please, inform me.

3rd April 2005, 04:21	#46
PulseDriver w3 addict (Major Dude) Join Date: May 2004 Location: Norway Posts: 1,806	Yes 09 F9 11 01 9D 74 E8 5B D8 41 56 C3 63 56 81 C0

3rd April 2005, 04:30	#51
PulseDriver w3 addict (Major Dude) Join Date: May 2004 Location: Norway Posts: 1,806	To get an idea, you should at least start checking the CSS with the jigsaw at w3c.org... here is the result I got: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/v...usermedium=all 09 F9 11 01 9D 74 E8 5B D8 41 56 C3 63 56 81 C0

3rd April 2005, 04:31	#52
mikm Major Dude Join Date: May 2001 Location: somewhere else Posts: 1,286	Most everybody would realize that goooglemail.com == gmail.com and that he wrote it out "fully" to fool spambots and idiots. powered by C₈H₁₀N₄O₂

3rd April 2005, 04:52	#56
PulseDriver w3 addict (Major Dude) Join Date: May 2004 Location: Norway Posts: 1,806	Yes, but you don't need to validate the document with html, you can validate the css file separatly... 09 F9 11 01 9D 74 E8 5B D8 41 56 C3 63 56 81 C0

3rd April 2005, 04:56	#60
PulseDriver w3 addict (Major Dude) Join Date: May 2004 Location: Norway Posts: 1,806	LOL! Where do you get all these ideas from... (really) 09 F9 11 01 9D 74 E8 5B D8 41 56 C3 63 56 81 C0

3rd April 2005, 04:10	#42
jerimiah40 Major Dude Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 955	I have FF, but it never occured to me to check it there... Hmmm... Wow, I really hijacekd this thread! But, who cares! Can people who suspect that its not displaying properly post a screenshot? Better yet, email them to me at Jerimiah[dot]40[at]Gmail[dot]com.

3rd April 2005, 04:17	#43
BigMoosie Banned Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 105	EDIT: sayed something stupid...

3rd April 2005, 04:23	#47
jerimiah40 Major Dude Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 955	Well, thats kinda fucked up. I'll have to play around with that. Anyone have any ideas what could be happening? Also, can somebody who has Opera or some other popular browser check it out for me?

3rd April 2005, 04:49	#55
jerimiah40 Major Dude Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 955	Well, I validated the CSS, and got it to be fine. Than, I went to do the HTML, and it couldn't do it properly, because the first line wasn't a Doctype Declaration. In the file however, it is, but in the source code, its not. Why? Because, Geocities puts a whole bunch of shit in at the top for no apparent reason. So, I did it with the file saved on my computer, and when I do it like that, Its perfectly fine HTML 4.01 Transitional. So, the HTML is valid except for geocities 2 cents, and the CSS is fine as well. This is really messed up.

3rd April 2005, 04:54	#58
jerimiah40 Major Dude Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 955	I did validate the CSS file seperately, it said it was fine. This is pissing me off, I'm starting a new thread for this.

3rd April 2005, 04:55	#59
ElChevelle Moderator Alumni Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: the MANCANNON! Posts: 22,448	Great, can you call that one "I ate my own turds"?

4th April 2005, 15:55	#66
BigMoosie Banned Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 105	deviantart validates

4th April 2005, 21:51	#67
PulseDriver w3 addict (Major Dude) Join Date: May 2004 Location: Norway Posts: 1,806	Yes, but Deviant Art doesn't follow the recommendation of not using tables for layout. 09 F9 11 01 9D 74 E8 5B D8 41 56 C3 63 56 81 C0

4th April 2005, 22:00	#68
zootm Forum King Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: the nether reaches of bonnie scotland Posts: 13,375	Every site listed is very old, also.

4th April 2005, 22:05	#69
PulseDriver w3 addict (Major Dude) Join Date: May 2004 Location: Norway Posts: 1,806	Well, I consider every site in XHTML to be quite new, I don't know what you mean about that zootm? Deviant Art uses XHTML 1.0 it starts off good with divs.. but once the tricky layout starts, it's tables all the way. 09 F9 11 01 9D 74 E8 5B D8 41 56 C3 63 56 81 C0

6th April 2005, 02:20	#73
BigMoosie Banned Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 105	hmmm... for some reason i remember it did, i guess not. anyway it doesnt really matter if a site validates.

6th April 2005, 04:05	#76
Mattress Forum King Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Milwaukee Posts: 4,577	heh, slashdot uses html 3.2 DTD Besides shooting out a big blank from your buttock, you can feel as if your root chakra leaked sweet hot mucus.

10th April 2005, 18:26	#77
Obedo Banned Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: State Hospital;They have me in this straightjacket & I have one hell of an itch...could you?.. Posts: 1,931	Man BigMoosie your like Special Ed with a computer

10th April 2005, 18:28	#78
ElChevelle Moderator Alumni Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: the MANCANNON! Posts: 22,448	He's like Special Ed with TWO hands up his bottom.

11th April 2005, 01:48	#79
BigMoosie Banned Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 105	STFU!!!!

11th April 2005, 01:55	#80
Fickle Butterknife of Justice (Forum King) Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Behind you. Posts: 5,502	BigMoosie, have you ever said anything intelligent? Is there going to be a time where I will enjoy one of your posts? Please, inform me. Go read a book without pictures pabook? \| Look, a blog! \| Buy Stuff I Wrote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode