|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yeah wow great shot!
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,839
|
Ty
![]() Oh, and check out what I saw today... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Moderator Alumni
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the MANCANNON!
Posts: 22,448
|
Where'd I put those damn stingers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,839
|
So much hate...
![]() I said that I saw Air Force One on IRC and in the shoutbox of a particular other set of forums, and in both places, people asked me if I shot at it / blew it up with my rocket launcher. Regardless of who the president is, the plane itself is still a remarkable piece of engineering and a symbol of power, imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Moderator Alumni
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the MANCANNON!
Posts: 22,448
|
It does have a huge head on it. The huge head in it, unfortunately, is pretty void of brain matter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,839
|
![]() Oh, and I got this picture after work this afternoon. Looks like a 767, but it's really too difficult to tell at that altitude with my current camera. I still think it's another cool vaportrail shot, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,839
|
![]() Wouldn't this be perfect for a caption contest? I got this picture Friday just after lunch time. The C-5 had just landed and taxied to that spot about fifteen minutes prior to that shot. The Delta Connections flight that's taxiing in front of it is a Bombardier RJ-200, I believe. If you took the wings off of it, you could roll it up into that C-5.I also got this picture Friday as well. I thought it was neat. I have a couple more pictures of that C-130j if anyone wants to see them, too. It was flying around for a couple hours doing touch-and-gos, so I got a couple pictures of it landing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yeah sure post them please!
The weather is beautiful over there by the way, unlike here... |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 41
|
i'm surprised nobody has any pictures of the FA/22 raptor, or any X-planes
i just LOVE this shot though http://www.10-7.com/humor/photopages/santa%20plane.jpg great plane that a380, shame they removed concorde, i wanted to fly on one of those
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,839
|
I've never taken any pictures of an F-22 personally, no. I have pictures of them, though.
Here's a couple more pictures of that C-130j. ![]() ![]() And here's a closer picture of that RJ-200.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Superb! I like how you can see the smoke coming from the tires of that Hercules and the hot air coming out of the engine on the RJ-200.
There must be a lot of activity on the airfield there, if you can shoot such pictures almost every day. |
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,839
|
It depends. The military air traffic varies from day to day, but the commercial air traffic is pretty constant. Here's the current flight schedule for the Gulfport-Biloxi International Airport. As you can see, it's not a big airport, but the flights are pretty concise.
And today, I managed to get a BUNCH of pictures. Here's a few of the better ones. I'll start with the small ones... Here is an AirTran Boeing 717 just before landing. This shot is of a Continental Embraer RJ-145 with a Delta Bombardier RJ-200 behind it on the taxiway. And now, for the highlight of the day... This is the C-5 Galaxy that landed here on Friday. A slightly closer shot of it taxiing towards the end of the runway. D'oh! Beginning to turn onto the runway. Back that ass up... No wait! Don't! :P Step on it. And finally... Yes, it was too big to fit into one picture, so I had to take FOUR. (5.87MB, sorry for the shitty image splicing) |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Moderator Alumni
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the MANCANNON!
Posts: 22,448
|
Still haven't gotten that camera but I can sit at the end of our runway. I'd better buy it fast because ski season ends in 3 weeks at which time the big boys quit the big planes in and out to DFW.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Moderator Alumni
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the MANCANNON!
Posts: 22,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,839
|
Nice picture.
Oh, and what kind of camera did'ya get?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
(Major Dude)
isn't very custom Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 2,004
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What airport is that? It looks like there's still some snow lying on those mountains.
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Moderator Alumni
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the MANCANNON!
Posts: 22,448
|
Those mountains were all white 2 weeks ago but spring has indeed sprung.
Gunnison, Colorado I opted for the Kodak C330. Cheap and since I worked there back in the day, I still feel loyalty, even though it was made in China like everything else around us. For high quality shots, I still use my tried and true SLR. Old skool baby! |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,839
|
Spiffy camera.
Check out what I got pictures of today... DSCF9764.jpg DSCF9783.jpg This is an MD-11. I know, it looks exactly like the DC-10 that I posted on the second page of this thread, but this one isn't actually a DC-10. The only real distinguishing features are the winglets on the tips of the main wings and the bulge around the intake of the top engine. I believe some of the later DC-10s had the bulge in the top engine nacelle, but I'm not entirely sure. But I'm pretty sure that those two features together are a sign that it's an MD-11 rather than a DC-10. I don't think the winglets were introduced until after the DC-10 had finished production. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Moderator Alumni
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the MANCANNON!
Posts: 22,448
|
Sweet!
Watched the Modern Marvels revised episode on the F14 a couple nights ago. I almost cried at the end when they were hacking up the planes now that they're done with their service ![]() Now that I've got a camera on hand all the time, the fighters and transports will probably quit frequenting us but I'll try |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Moderator Alumni
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the MANCANNON!
Posts: 22,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,839
|
Yowzers!
The two pictures of that MD-11 that I just posted are only two of 55 total shots that I got of it before it took off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Moderator Alumni
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the MANCANNON!
Posts: 22,448
|
It came with a Sarge-sized dictionary for an owners' manual so obviously I need to read up on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Moderator Alumni
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the MANCANNON!
Posts: 22,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,839
|
Looks like it. It's definitely not a 737.
Our airport used to fly twin-turboprop planes a few years ago. They finally phased them all out and went strictly jet. I have some more pictures that I took earlier today, and I'll post them in a little bit once I upload them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Moderator Alumni
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the MANCANNON!
Posts: 22,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,839
|
![]() Ok, here are the pictures I promised. I got all of these today: DSCF9821.jpg DSCF9828.jpg DSCF9836.jpg DSCF9847.jpg DSCF9910.jpg DSCF9930.jpg The first and third pictures are of a C-130j. There were three of them doing touch-and-gos for a few hours at the airport today. The reason why they're the first and third shots is because they had to make room for the Northwest DC-9 in the second shot. When that DC-9 came in, the C-130s extended their flightpaths out farther so that they could squeese 'em in. The fourth picture is of the new AirTran 717 that I've been trying to get pictures of for a while now. It's always here when I'm not. :P I was lucky enough to be at the equipment yard when it taxied out today, though. I like the paint scheme on their new planes. Looks much better than the older ones. I'm not sure what kinds of planes are in the last two pictures. I took that first vaportrail shot just before I came home, and I took the last one just after I got home. They look very similar... But that's a pretty common shape. Those are both at 100% magnification, btw.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Moderator Alumni
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the MANCANNON!
Posts: 22,448
|
All I know for sure is that it's an Airbus. The data I'm looking at shows little difference between the 310 and 320.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,839
|
Yeah, I just looked that one up on the Airbus website. That is an A320... I thought it was an A310 at first too because I thought that their numbering scheme gave larger numbers to the larger planes.
I guess it's not all that uncommon. After all, a Boeing 747 is bigger than a 757. I don't know much about Airbus anyways, so I won't act like I do. :P
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Moderator Alumni
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the MANCANNON!
Posts: 22,448
|
Just happened to pull into town this morning in time to catch this one with bent landing gear.
![]() Sarge, that's the base of "W" mountain on the right (the snow's almost off the W and I'll get a shot of it soon). When American Airlines is on approach in the afternoon, they fly around the south side of it and do a left 180 around it to access the runway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Moderator Alumni
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the MANCANNON!
Posts: 22,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,839
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Moderator Alumni
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the MANCANNON!
Posts: 22,448
|
![]() I knew you'd see that. If you were to fly in from where you live it's be "M" Mountain
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Airbus:
A300: first one, pretty short wide body. A310: second even a little bit shorter wide body. A320: narrow body, similar to 737. Variations: A318, 319, 321 (similar to 757). A330: large wide body, similar to 777, two engines. A340: similar to A330, a little bit shorter, four engines, mainly for trans pacific flights. A380: known, I think. ![]() The numbers are chronologic, as with Boeing, but the 318, 319 and 321 numbers are based on size and were added later. |
|
|
|
#37 | |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,839
|
Got'cha.
Quote:
![]() Oh, and I got this picture today before work started: DSCF9955.jpg It's a 737-500 (737-524, to be exact ) just like the others that I've posted in this thread, so it looks identical except for the tail number. Interestingly enough, this one and the last one that I posted both have registrations to Wells Fargo Bank. I'll look up the others when I'm not feeling so lazy.Also, here's the flightpath for this morning's flight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What's with the 524? What kind of Boeing number is that?
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Moderator Alumni
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the MANCANNON!
Posts: 22,448
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 60,839
|
I think Continental Airlines probably financed their fleet of planes through Wells Fargo or something. I'm not sure.
And about the 524... I'm not entirely sure about that, either. The number subsets are probably to designate updates and minor redesigns within a particular model. Kinda like software application versions (Winamp for example: 5.08, 5.13, 5.21, etc). |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|