My last skin got a crapy 2 stars and I think it deserved far better, its at least a 4 star skin!
Heres the review of it so u can decide for yourself: http://www.winamp.com/customize/deta...ponentId=12676
Yeah I know I mentioned that in the General descusion forum, just nit pickin ya know!
Plus there are alot of recent 5 star skins in the game section that are crap in my opinion! Wot is up with these reviewers would someone pleaze tell me! If they dont like the particular subject of the skin or like the subject of the skin so much that they over rate the skin then they should just pass it to someone else who can rate it fairly based on how well it is made.
I think some sort of reviewing points system should be shown in reviews after the reviewers comments to show how the reviewer came to his/her conclusion on the final overall rating using the same 5 star thing e.g.
(does it look good)
(does all the buttons line up and work properly)
(Is it ripped off or is it original)
(the average of the stars given to the above points)
There could be other things to rate aswell to determin the overall score, I think this would make reviews much clearer on why the revier gave it the score they gave. It would also be advisable that reviewers dont be biased in their reviews just because they happen to love/hate the particular subject/game/anime/brand name/person on the skin.
Neo - "Visit Neo Skinz to see my Winamp and ICQ skins!"
"Philosophy is to science as pornography is to sex!"