Everyone has valid points-
the way i see it, skins should be reviewed
like.... figure skating. Yeah.
You have 3 - 5 people look at it, and they say "5.0/4.0/4.5/3.5/5.0" And then have an
average. Done. Then for the best skins you
could write a cool commentary, and for
the rest, a quick sentence. I see that as the
best "Compromise" between comittee and quick
and dirty approaches.
And there are more subtle advantages to this
as well- like for example, the fourth reviewer consistantly has the same taste you
have. Then you could run a search on HIS favorites... and then you could get all kinds of skins you like.
Also, We all know the reviewers have a liking
of metal designs. If the panel was made so that all of the reviewers had different tastes, a Consistantly high scoring skin would truly be the "Creme de la Creme" of
===This is not a democracy!