nak 100 - Page 3

tuckerm · 10th July 2006, 13:52

AOL has bigger problems to worry about than a free program listing service.

Quit bitching, get on with life. Most of the time the YP wont help at all. Advertise to people, make a damn website that isnt free, advertise around town.

SpitfireTN · 10th July 2006, 23:29

Quote:

Originally posted by tuckerm
AOL has bigger problems to worry about than a free program listing service.

Quit bitching, get on with life. Most of the time the YP wont help at all. Advertise to people, make a damn website that isnt free, advertise around town.

They are not offering a free program listing service. If they were, I wouldn't be here bitching about it not working. I never had these problems before AOL took over. I have everything mentioned above besides a working YP from shoutcast.

P.S. As you can see by my join date, I have been doing this for many years now. Why should years of good service from Shoutcast fall to the way side?

Evil Lu · 10th July 2006, 23:35

After all the complaints of the past 8 weeks or so I would like to see the whole thing removed and all these wannabe djs get their own websites and advertising sorted.
I've said before that I've never even looked at the listings to see if our station is on or not and don't plan to start now. People will find you if you're any good and have made efforts to show that you are.
At the same time, if it does end up that there is no shoutcast listings then this part of the forum will be swamped with idiots who can't suss out HTML.

hackerdork · 11th July 2006, 00:57

well shit.

I've been around this stuff since before winamp 1.066 (hence the yp port 666 thing!!), and AOL came into the picture longer and most of your forum members. You need to consider that this is over 3,000,000 servers at any giving time and 5,000,000 noobs 'testing' shoutcast or fucking around and attacking it.

The listing server is FREE for me, and everyone else. Who tells you its now free? You are not paying a flipping penny to download a peice of software, DSP plugin and start sending your data to the internet and waiting for listeners. Hello, market your station, dont epect anyone else to do it for you. Listeners dont just appear out of thin air if your stuff is the same as everyone else or you are contastly going down before of your lack of knowledge and internet issues.

so stop the bitch fest...
PRESS * FOR HELP

SpitfireTN · 11th July 2006, 03:25

I guess you guys like this free service that doesn't work after years of working just fine. When I came here many years ago, I was told I could use this software & have my station listed for free. Thats not happening now. The question is, why, and when will it be fixed. No one is bitching. They are just asking when will this free service be availible again? If AOL is planning on charging, were do you sign up? I don't just use the free software, I am willing to pay for something thats worth it. A working Shoutcast YP is worth something, if its working right.

No bitching here, after all, I been running 8 differant audio ads for Shoutcast for many years now for their devoted work.

Zoab · 11th July 2006, 10:47

Quote:

Originally posted by nitromix

My questions is:
-Where the f**k is this bug?
-Where is the greate Shoutcast/AOL team to fix?
-Why you offer something for free, something what donsn't work anymore?
-Is this the end of YP?
-Somebody from tehnical team from Shoutcast work on this issue, or we lost the time to post on this forum?
-Why all the time some "Forum King" post the wrong solution?

Well.....where are the big shots now?
They can't really answer the questions, cant they?
It's even worse, they can't even answer any question about this issue!

They only have some "statements": It's free, so shut the f*ck up, Sit back and relax, You'll have to wait untill it's over, etc, etc......
And when they are finished they are putting the record back on......bladibladiblahhh

Conclusion: You never will get a serious answer!
But what do you expect?
IT'S JUST FREE!

ClassicRox · 11th July 2006, 11:46

Ok, here's my problem with this whole situation:

If the Shoutcast YP is too much for AOL to handle, or to be bothered with, why don't they just offer the whole kit and kaboodle to any one of the hobbyists on here? I'm sure there are plenty on this forum who would be more than happy to take over the source code for this program, and try to get it working, without even asking for compensation.

After all, they've been having problems for quite some time now, and it's obvious that it's not that high on their list of priorities to get it fixed. There are some very brilliant people that I've seen on this forum over the years, and I'm positive that, if given the chance, they'd have these problems fixed in a matter of HOURS, not MONTHS.

bored_womble · 11th July 2006, 13:21

it is something which is very simple to produce, a working YP, and I did see a thread about a company offering YP functionality ( although it was and probably still is in development ) and pointed to

http://forums.winamp.com/showthread....hreadid=250183

Now with anyone else developing a YP the problem is pointing any shoutcast server to it. Although it is possible ( instructions appear to be in the post abobve ) it is not for the newbie and *could* potentially cause other problems.

The best solution would be, and I do not presume to want changes AOL are not willing/can not make*, would be to produce a version of the shoutcast server that can be configured to point elsewhere.

BW

* there are potential legal issues relating to allow publishing outside of the realm owned by AOL/Nullsoft.

tuckerm · 11th July 2006, 13:52

Quote:

Originally posted by Zoab
Well.....where are the big shots now?
They can't really answer the questions, cant they?
It's even worse, they can't even answer any question about this issue!

They only have some "statements": It's free, so shut the f*ck up, Sit back and relax, You'll have to wait untill it's over, etc, etc......
And when they are finished they are putting the record back on......bladibladiblahhh

Conclusion: You never will get a serious answer!
But what do you expect?
IT'S JUST FREE!

Big shots dont ready this whiney useless threads. Tag said there has been backend problems and they are working on it.

Zoab · 11th July 2006, 14:01

Quote:

Originally posted by tuckerm
Big shots dont ready this whiney useless threads. Tag said there has been backend problems and they are working on it.

Yeah.....right!

Huaso · 25th July 2006, 06:00

Please Shoutcast Developer Team, work in this problem, i change the port but to the following week the error was the same one.

My Stream, my Inet, my Conf are right!

http://medios.inf.uct.cl:8100/

CraigF · 25th July 2006, 09:59

consolidating NAK 100 threads.

Please continue discussions here:

http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?postid=1990188

10th July 2006, 13:52	#1
tuckerm Forum Emo Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 8,364	AOL has bigger problems to worry about than a free program listing service. Quit bitching, get on with life. Most of the time the YP wont help at all. Advertise to people, make a damn website that isnt free, advertise around town. @tuckerm

11th July 2006, 00:57	#4
hackerdork Forum King Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Earth Circa sometime. Posts: 3,297	well shit. I've been around this stuff since before winamp 1.066 (hence the yp port 666 thing!!), and AOL came into the picture longer and most of your forum members. You need to consider that this is over 3,000,000 servers at any giving time and 5,000,000 noobs 'testing' shoutcast or fucking around and attacking it. The listing server is FREE for me, and everyone else. Who tells you its now free? You are not paying a flipping penny to download a peice of software, DSP plugin and start sending your data to the internet and waiting for listeners. Hello, market your station, dont epect anyone else to do it for you. Listeners dont just appear out of thin air if your stuff is the same as everyone else or you are contastly going down before of your lack of knowledge and internet issues. so stop the bitch fest... PRESS * FOR HELP ~ According to the ship's log we're down to our last 3000 vomit bags.It'll never be enough. search the forums! don't PM me on how-to, or ask me to setup you system. you do it so you learn.

11th July 2006, 11:46	#7
ClassicRox Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 218	Ok, here's my problem with this whole situation: If the Shoutcast YP is too much for AOL to handle, or to be bothered with, why don't they just offer the whole kit and kaboodle to any one of the hobbyists on here? I'm sure there are plenty on this forum who would be more than happy to take over the source code for this program, and try to get it working, without even asking for compensation. After all, they've been having problems for quite some time now, and it's obvious that it's not that high on their list of priorities to get it fixed. There are some very brilliant people that I've seen on this forum over the years, and I'm positive that, if given the chance, they'd have these problems fixed in a matter of HOURS, not MONTHS. Click banner to tune in! *Broadband only!*

11th July 2006, 13:21	#8
bored_womble Winamp's Womble Join Date: May 2004 Location: Wimbledon Common Posts: 1,100	it is something which is very simple to produce, a working YP, and I did see a thread about a company offering YP functionality ( although it was and probably still is in development ) and pointed to http://forums.winamp.com/showthread....hreadid=250183 Now with anyone else developing a YP the problem is pointing any shoutcast server to it. Although it is possible ( instructions appear to be in the post abobve ) it is not for the newbie and could potentially cause other problems. The best solution would be, and I do not presume to want changes AOL are not willing/can not make, would be to produce a version of the shoutcast server that can be configured to point elsewhere. BW there are potential legal issues relating to allow publishing outside of the realm owned by AOL/Nullsoft. Without open minds the world will die. Open yours and correct the mistakes you are making right now.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

10th July 2006, 23:35	#3
Evil Lu Forum Maitresse Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: I'm hiding under your bed Posts: 2,974	After all the complaints of the past 8 weeks or so I would like to see the whole thing removed and all these wannabe djs get their own websites and advertising sorted. I've said before that I've never even looked at the listings to see if our station is on or not and don't plan to start now. People will find you if you're any good and have made efforts to show that you are. At the same time, if it does end up that there is no shoutcast listings then this part of the forum will be swamped with idiots who can't suss out HTML.

11th July 2006, 03:25	#5
SpitfireTN Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Tennessee Posts: 47	I guess you guys like this free service that doesn't work after years of working just fine. When I came here many years ago, I was told I could use this software & have my station listed for free. Thats not happening now. The question is, why, and when will it be fixed. No one is bitching. They are just asking when will this free service be availible again? If AOL is planning on charging, were do you sign up? I don't just use the free software, I am willing to pay for something thats worth it. A working Shoutcast YP is worth something, if its working right. No bitching here, after all, I been running 8 differant audio ads for Shoutcast for many years now for their devoted work.

25th July 2006, 06:00	#11
Huaso Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 8	Please Shoutcast Developer Team, work in this problem, i change the port but to the following week the error was the same one. My Stream, my Inet, my Conf are right! http://medios.inf.uct.cl:8100/

25th July 2006, 09:59	#12
CraigF Passionately Apathetic Administrator Join Date: May 2000 Location: Hell Posts: 5,435	consolidating NAK 100 threads. Please continue discussions here: http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?postid=1990188