|
|
#1 | |
|
Followed by Gnomes
(Forum King) |
North Korea aparently conducted its first nuke test
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
wwwyzzerdd
(Forum King) Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,458
|
Source?
![]() "Oh BTW. How do you say 'stop throwing shit at the side of my house' in spanish?" Check out my music |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
wwwyzzerdd
(Forum King) Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,458
|
What a fucking idiot.
![]() "Oh BTW. How do you say 'stop throwing shit at the side of my house' in spanish?" Check out my music |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hobbit Humper
Forum King Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: banned camp
Posts: 4,099
|
Just saw this. Get ready for the ride folks, its about to hit the fan...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum King
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: the nether reaches of bonnie scotland
Posts: 13,378
|
...holeeee shit!
Edit: |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum King
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 10,622
|
The chinese are pretty cheesed saying "This cannot be tolerated". The problem with detonating nuclear bombs in Korea is that korea is very wet. Contamination of their ground water and the surrounding oceans is a real concern.
That's why nobody really expected this. We think that they were involved in a Pakistan nuclear test back in 1998, because Pakistan obstensibly didn't have enough nuclear material. Registering a 3.4 on the richter scale in South Korea, whatever they've built, it's sure not a firecracker. Global Movies and TV God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change; courage to change the things I can; and wisdom to hide the bodies of people who pissed me off. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum King
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: the nether reaches of bonnie scotland
Posts: 13,378
|
China are super-pissed, yeah. By the way of confirmation, the US are reporting that they did monitor the earthquake that was caused, and Russia have said they are "100% certain" that a test has occurred.
Edit: The Q&A on the BBC site is good for background information, if anyone's interested. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Nullsoft Newbie
(Moderator) Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sheffield, England
Posts: 5,568
|
Quote:
Quote:
DO NOT PM ME WITH TECH SUPPORT QUESTIONS |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Moderator Alumni
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the MANCANNON!
Posts: 22,431
|
Prepare the puppets!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Forum Sot
(Major Dude) Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Marietta, Ga. U.S.A.
Posts: 3,915
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Made In The USA
(Forum King) |
Quote:
Regardless of how big the explosion is, if it can kill a bunch of people and cause a radioactive fallout, it's a nuke...Now, the only question we have to ask ourselves is if it's actually a nuke, or if it's just a big flub by some other lower bomb...Either way, it's hard to downplay a wingnut like Kim Jong Ill, even if he did have only a firecracker... These next few weeks are gonna be frustrating as hell...North Korea has just tested a nuke, they wanna test another, and all we wanna do is hold more 6-party diplomatic talks, and all the UN will do is impose more sanctions... Greaaaaaat...What will we do if North Korea wants to "test" a nuke on top of another nation?
"I just want to lie in my own crusty filth, eating rancid egg sandwiches, until some unfortunate paramedic has to blow down my door to find my bloated and pasty corpse wedged between the nightstand and mattress stained with Bengay and Robitussin DM." - Greg Gutfeld on sex and seniors "Syphilis does not stay in Vegas. Debt collectors do not stay in Vegas. Dead hookers stay in Vegas, but the guilt stays with you forever." - Bill Schultz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum King
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 4,577
|
test some nukes on them I'd guess.
Re: the relatively small explosion: they probably don't want to waste precious fissionable material on their test nukes since it's probably not too easy for them to get a lot of it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum King
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 10,622
|
It's almost like this stopped being our problem. China and Japan have agreed that this is "unnacceptable". That's probably the first time they've agreed on anything in a century.
I think the Chinese think, rightly, that this could be an excuse for Japan to arm. I'm almost expecting for NKs neighbors to take care of this. It may not be our problem. I think China and Japan are far more threatened by this than we are. For China, I think it's fear of getting bit by their own dog. I half suspect that the arms buildup by the Chinese, which some of the west have attributed as a threat to Taiwan, might be for another reason. Global Movies and TV God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change; courage to change the things I can; and wisdom to hide the bodies of people who pissed me off. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum King
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 4,577
|
another hypothesis for the relative smallness of the nuclear explosion is that they are testing suitcase sized nukes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Followed by Gnomes
(Forum King) |
The smallest nukes made were the MK-54 SADM, and the Davy Crocket. They're both bigger than suitcases.
Davy Crocket, yield- 10 to 20 tons: ![]() MK-54 SADM, dial-a-yield- 10 tons to 1 kiloton: ![]() Those are also, like, Cold War era. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum King
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 4,577
|
certainly technology since the cold war era has not gotten any smaller...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Followed by Gnomes
(Forum King) |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum King
|
That Crocket would make a killer paperweight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum King
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 4,577
|
nice pun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 209
|
If I remember correctly, the critical mass is 12 kg of Plutonium (do not remember isotope). That can easily fit in a suitcase (well, it would be pretty radioactive, but as a quantity it definitely fits in the suitcase).
Modern bombs have beyond the original Plutonium core some hydrogen around (and are actually more like H-bombs, but I may be wrong on this one). COMPELTELY MISSING THE POINT Nevertheless, the point of *nuclear bomb* is so irrelevant (and was so irrelevant in all the past 50 years), that I can not imagine why people were so dumb to believe it is the ultimate weapon. Every nation that has a nuclear plant has such a powerful deterrant that it DOES NOT NEED a nuclear device. Do you remember Chernobyl? Only a small part of the nuclear fuel/ waste of just one reactor was spilled in the atmosphere, and that was enough for widespread destruction. (that is why they sent 10,000 soldiers to certain death to burry the reactor under thick concrete.) So, every nation having a single nuclear reactor can build effective dirty bombs. And even NK conforming to the stringent US conditions would be able to do so. So I miss the point for this whole story. They just need to stockpile their waste for 2-3 years (the waste is inactivated in some 10,000 years, so it won't become less toxic for A VERY< VERY LONG TIME) and have enough material to exterminate most of the planet. Differences between nuclear and dirty bomb - atomic bomb would destroy the buildings, - while they would remain intact after a dirty bomb - yet they would be inhabitable due to the fallout - fallout after dirty bomb is much longer (100s of years to thousands of years) - the dirty bomb is completely insensitive to the newly introduced US shield as it is designed NOT to explode, BUT to disperse its nuclear material into the atmosphere over a wide area, so in some way this shield would do exactly this - the only advantage of the nuclear bomb is when you want to konquer some land (because of the significantly shorter fallout), but I have serious doubts NK will try to konquer the US; I have posted similar comments on CNN and BBC but they did not make it, at least until now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum King
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 4,577
|
a bioweapon would be much better than a dirty bomb . kill off the population, leave the infrastructure untouched and useable for re-population with your own people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 209
|
But I doubt the NK regime and the NK people would want to inhabit the US. Just my thaughts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum King
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 4,577
|
I bet most of the NK people would love to inhabit the US, even without us being dead. problem is NK government won't let them leave.
![]() even being homeless in the US is probably a million times better than living in NK. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Viking
(Forum King) Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The North
Posts: 3,541
|
Don't know what's going on with Abe, he is, or atleast was, a complete nutjob - promoting pre WWII nationalism, now he's restoring diplomatic relations with Japans main rival, and completely ruling out Japan getting nuclear weapons.
fucking weird ![]() Allthough, should they ever need it, they could probaly make one faster than North Koreas pedal powered rockets could reach Japan. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|