|
|
#1 |
|
Forum King
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Mobil Ave.
Posts: 5,381
|
Launnching/Starting an EXE...
Can somone please post code for a button (lets say) in Visual Basic 6 (even 5.0 is good) so that when I click the button, an exe will launch. Thanks for the help again.
You guys rock
"Welcome to the Island of people who know too much."..."Did you really think balloons would stop him?!" See what I'm listening too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum King
|
I don't remember off the top of my head, but I think the shell command is what you are looking for
code: exactly like start>run | |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum King
|
VB is an ugly language . . .
Blech For the freedom to express myself in my own way without fear of being censored or banned.47 65 6C 61 65 64 2E 63 6F 6D 00 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Rudolf the Red.
(Forum King) Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 9,314
|
Agreed George
"We think science is interesting and if you disagree, you can fuck off." |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: well you got to find me first :D
Posts: 201
|
all i know how to do is make buttons and labels
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum King
|
I think I'll stick to my Java, C++, and itty bitty bit of C.
![]() (And Javascript )I was going to learn Pascal a while back, but I was anything but impressed with it. I found an article a while back written by one of the creators of C. It explained why Pascal could never (and should never) be a real, professional language. I'd still choose Pascal over VB. For the freedom to express myself in my own way without fear of being censored or banned.47 65 6C 61 65 64 2E 63 6F 6D 00 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 11,361
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Forum King
|
Quote:
Quote:
For the freedom to express myself in my own way without fear of being censored or banned.47 65 6C 61 65 64 2E 63 6F 6D 00 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 11,361
|
Quote:
RE: Java... it's nice (cross platform, I think, is it's strongest point), but I don't like how it's not compiled... that makes it so... messy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum King
|
Java is compiled. It's just not compiled into bytecode that can run on an x86 machine. (not without an interpretter)
![]() Actually, I aws just looking at some Smalltalk stuff after I said that. I think it looks nasty, too. You can search in Google if you want, but I wouldn't recommend it. They claim to have built Smalltalk to look like a spoken lanugage, but either they are lying or the screwed it really hard. It's about as ugly as VB crossed with Pascal. For the freedom to express myself in my own way without fear of being censored or banned.47 65 6C 61 65 64 2E 63 6F 6D 00 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 11,361
|
If I ever go beyond what I know now, it'll definitely be towards C++ or Java. More likely Java... C++ looks messy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum King
|
I am in the process of learning c++. Anyway, what about c#? is that supposed to be better?
| |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum King
|
C# is too proprietary. It's not worth learning, I don't think. At least, not unless you already know a more useful language (C, C++) C# is guaranteed to be a little bit slower than C++ or C. Nothing you can do about that. It's only real advantage that I can see is automatic memory management (which is one of the reasons it will always be slower), but you can run a garbage collector in C++. You can buy them. I think there are even some free ones.
C++ is messier than Java, but it's also extremely powerful. It's arguably more powerful than any other language. For the freedom to express myself in my own way without fear of being censored or banned.47 65 6C 61 65 64 2E 63 6F 6D 00 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Major Dude
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Forum King
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Mobil Ave.
Posts: 5,381
|
Quote:
Link to smalltalk: best I can offer is a link to www.code.box.sk and from there there is a small talk link on the right hand column. "Welcome to the Island of people who know too much."..."Did you really think balloons would stop him?!" See what I'm listening too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Forum King
|
Quote:
![]() No, Java will never make EXEs unlsess it becomes fully compilable. Actually, there are some companies that have produced full java compilers, but unfortunately, they still require that you have the JRE installed, unless you manage to write a program that uses zero calls to the core classes. On the upside, all this is transparent to the user. they think they are just clicking a normal EXE. The runtime is built into the EXE, so the user never sees it. For the freedom to express myself in my own way without fear of being censored or banned.47 65 6C 61 65 64 2E 63 6F 6D 00 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|