"Pre-emptive attacks are not the exclusive right of the US." Says N Korea

[fwgx]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/korea/article/0,2763,889679,00.html

North Korea is entitled to launch a pre-emptive strike against the US rather than wait until the American military have finished with Iraq, the North's foreign ministry told the Guardian yesterday.
Warning that the current nuclear crisis is worse than that in 1994, when the peninsula stood on the brink of oblivion, a ministry spokesman called on Britain to use its influence with Washington to avert war.

"The United States says that after Iraq, we are next", said the deputy director Ri Pyong-gap, "but we have our own countermeasures. Pre-emptive attacks are not the exclusive right of the US."

[Xerxes]

Every shows how spiteful and hateful you are of Western Society.

[Trigear]

let the bodies hit the floor, let the bodies hit the floor, let the bodies hit the floor...

[Some1]

Pre-emptive attacks are not the exclusive right of the US

While accurate, North Korea has essentially signed its own death warrant with that statement...

[Twilightseer]

Originally posted by Xerxes
Every shows how spiteful and hateful you are of Western Society.

Maybe he's just laughing AT the statement, not because he likes it.

[fwgx]

Originally posted by Xerxes
Every shows how spiteful and hateful you are of Western Society.

Nope just the policies and antics of the US and UK around the world. I also think this reason was given by the Germans when they invaded Poland and the US when they invade Iraq.

Excuse me whilst I start gut laughing again.

[binary hero]

something tells me Bush is gonna get his ass pooned. this would be withstandable IF WE WEREN'T TALKING ABOUT KILLING PEOPLE. it was gonna happen eventually, somebody would decide to fight back.

tri - good song, must find that album again

[zootm]

fantastic. someone had to say it.

[Twilightseer]

Question to all Americans :

If I have understood the situation properly, the USA wants to attack Iraq because they MAY have mass destruction weapons.
Now, we know that North Korea, which is a dictature as well, does have mass destruction weapons.
Question : why won't the USA attack North-Korea ?

[fwgx]

Why doesn't everyone attack the US and UK? They're the ones using the threat of nuclear weapons on people most seriously and aggressivly. We should bomb the fuck out of them!

[NetFury]

the majority of US citizens do not back Bush's stance on war, nor do they want to play big brother. i know, because i'm one of those citizens.

Originally posted by Phily Baby
Why doesn't everyone attack the US and UK? They're the ones using the threat of nuclear weapons on people most seriously and aggressivly. We should bomb the fuck out of them!

i saw no wink or anything of that nature, so..GO FUCK YOURSELF.

[ujay]

Originally posted by Xerxes
Every shows how spiteful and hateful you are of Western Society.

Since when did American Society equal Western Society ?

Since when did spite and hate equal scorn and dirision ?

UJ

[zootm]

Originally posted by Twilightseer
Question : why won't the USA attack North-Korea ?

because the threat of them using their weapons is less, and they may not have the weapons. no wait - n. korea DO have weapons, and ARE threatening directly to use them.

buggered if i know seer. might be something to do with the fact that this war is just internal US politics, taken to the extreme.

[fwgx]

Originally posted by NetFury
i saw no wink or anything of that nature, so..GO FUCK YOURSELF.

Am I wrong?

[zootm]

Originally posted by Phily Baby
Am I wrong?

that's not the issue. the issue is that you called to bomb someone's country. it's something that you could understand people getting upset about.

the bottom line though, is that those crazy yanks just don't get sarcasm.