Winamp News

[Aminifu]

...

We lost it when AOL shut down the project back in 2013.

Probably just nostalgic wishful thinking on my part, but yeah, those were the days...

I lurked around for years getting solutions for my issues before I finally joined the forum and started expressing my 2 cents. I will always regret waiting so long before becoming an active member. There was definitely a strong feeling of community between users, mods and devs back before AOL threw in the towel, I miss it.

[ChocolateAdventurouz]

Winamp 5 for Windows is still an ongoing project.

[...]
We've now got a whole new development team!!! Yay!

The biggest job of all was to get the Winamp 5 project ported over from old VS2008 to VS2017 (or newer) and building...

The refactoring process is still on the way, but almost complete.

There won't be many new features in the next release, mainly refactoring, bug fixes, 3rd-party lib updates (Lame, libmpg123, libflac, libvorbis, etc.) - the main thing is to get the project building and active again.


[...]
________________

On the one hand, it is great to port the SDK from VS 2008 to VS 2017 (i can finally be a plugin dev, yay) and support the project (even Radionomy doesn't seem to care for Winamp as a media player), but on the other hand, the NFT stuff and Radionomy 'destroying' Winamp doesn't make me feel ready to install the '5.9' version on my system (if it will be released). DrO's project, on the other-other hand, (3 hands? Dang it) doesn't make me feel ready either cuz, of the community and because it is still under Beta/Preview. That forces me to stay on Nullsoft versions.

P.S: Since the 'new Winamp 5' is going to use open-source codecs, I don't see really much of the point to keep the project as Freeware.

That's what I have to say. That's my opinion about things.

Thanks.

[DJ Egg]

Just to reiterate, Winamp(6?) for Android, iOS & web is a completely different project.

Winamp 5.9 will be the continuation of Winamp for Windows (v2.x, v5.666, v5.8, etc).

There's no NFTs in Winamp for Windows.

But again, I can't guarantee that there won't eventually be e.g. an (optional) Online Services type view available in Winamp 5.9.x (not v5.9.0, but a later release) which provides services from Winamp(6?)... for which I don't currently have much details.

And again, I'm part of the Winamp 5.x and Shoutcast DNAS Dev/QA/Support teams, as I have been for many years.
I'm speaking about the good old Winamp that we all know and love, not the brand new/separate product.

Of course, all feedback (whether for Winamp 5.x, Winamp(6?), or other) is welcome.

[MrSinatra]

terrible idea, btw, if you still want some sort of rep, i wouldnt do this

ad hominem. if you want a good rep, back up your statements with a viable argument.

[NJK]

ad hominem. if you want a good rep, back up your statements with a viable argument.

don't hold your breath waiting for that.

[TimbreWolf]

Just to reiterate, Winamp(6?) for Android, iOS & web is a completely different project.

Winamp 5.9 will be the continuation of Winamp for Windows (v2.x, v5.666, v5.8, etc).

There's no NFTs in Winamp for Windows.

But again, I can't guarantee that there won't eventually be e.g. an (optional) Online Services type view available in Winamp 5.9.x (not v5.9.0, but a later release) which provides services from Winamp(6?)... for which I don't currently have much details.

And again, I'm part of the Winamp 5.x and Shoutcast DNAS Dev/QA/Support teams, as I have been for many years.
I'm speaking about the good old Winamp that we all know and love, not the brand new/separate product.

Of course, all feedback (whether for Winamp 5.x, Winamp(6?), or other) is welcome.

This is such great news, thank you!!! Maybe the Android code base can help to provide a pathway towards a Linux compatible version of desktop Winamp in the future. I have been wishing for that for maybe a decade now so that I can finally escape Windows, which is becoming an increasingly urgent priority with the direction Microsoft is going in. But whatever about that, it would be great to breath some life into Winamp again to try to counter the view predominantly found on the internet that Winamp = Winamp 2.

[Mikey7]

Whereas I would prefer direct communication from those Winamp developers regarding a 5.9 version and in fact, consider it a bit suspect that they *aren't* communicating directly with their base, not to mention the fact I was very put off by the NFT statement (and what it offered - yeesh!) I'm still open-minded and keeping my eyes and ears open.

[Mikey7]

Also, there's another disconnect there, offering 5.8 for download. Again, considering how a sizeable portion of the Winamp community feels about 5.8 vs 5.666, this feels pretty tone deaf. We'll see.

[Mikey7]

I'm more caught up now with other forum posts pertinent to this particular conversation. I understand now that DJ Egg is that direct communication with the new Winamp team. Also, the reason for offering 5.8 is that 5.666 presents copyright issues; 5.8 allows for better continuity.

Until 5.9 drops, I may try installing 5.8 on top of 5.666. I'm led to believe now from other posts, that this may offer improvements without losing patches and functionality from 5.666. If it screws something up its not like I can't reinstall. I would like to keep Album Art and the Waveform Seeker for example which were built specifically for 5.666 build 3516.

Ok - that's all I got. Sorry for any confusion. I'm trying to spark further interest and conversation for this post as it's a very interesting one. Cheers.

[MrSinatra]

odd no one has posted about 5.9.x in this thread yet...

http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?t=459660

[Myhrddin]

Thanks for posting link. I hadn't been keeping up and could've easily missed it during today's visit. Too many distractions lately. (or always)

*Cheers!